Colvilles worry that wolves will hurt hunting
The tribes told members of the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission on Thursday that a plan to restore at least five breeding pairs of wolves in Eastern Washington has the potential to reduce herds of elk, deer and moose on its reservation.
Tribal members harvest up to 1,000 deer, 400 elk and 50 moose each year, and worry a large increase in the number of wolves will increase competition for the animals.
"We have 60 percent unemployment on our reservation," Joe Peone of the Colville Tribes Fish and Wildlife Department told the commission. "To be able to rely on subsistence hunting is critical."
The comments came as the commission held the final public meeting on its proposed plan in the Spokane suburb of Airway Heights. The commission is expected to take final action on the wolf plan at its December meeting.
Three of the state's five known breeding packs are located in the northeast, where the tribe's reservation is located, Peone said.
The tribe wants to ensure the state wolf management plan provides a balance between the needs of wolves and hunters, Peone said.
The state plan, released this summer after several years of work, calls for the return of 15 successful breeding pairs in the state for three consecutive years before removing endangered species protections from the animals.
Farmers and ranchers have criticized the plan in previous meetings as putting their livestock and livelihoods at risk. Conservations want more breeding pairs established before hunting is allowed.
Gray wolves were eliminated as a breeding species in Washington by the 1930s. They have never been reintroduced to Washington but numerous sightings over the years suggested that the animals had crossed into Washington from neighboring states and British Columbia.
Gray wolves are listed as an endangered species statewide under Washington law, and in the western two-thirds of the state under federal law. There currently are five confirmed resident wolf packs.
Under the agency's original plan for delisting, five breeding pairs would be required in Eastern Washington, four in the North Cascades and six in the South Cascades or Northwest Coast. But the agency is also considering reducing that to four pairs in each region, plus three more anywhere in the state.
Two of the state's confirmed wolf packs reside in north-central Washington's Methow Valley and the Teanaway Valley of Kittitas County, with the other three in the northeast corner.
Efforts to save wolves have been controversial throughout western states in recent years. Earlier this year, Congress stripped federal endangered species protections from wolves in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming and the eastern one-third of Washington and Oregon. Wolves are still under federal endangered species protections in the western two-thirds of those two states.
The goal of the management plan is to eventually make wolves a game animal, said Nate Pamplin of the state Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Phil Anderson, director of the department, acknowledged that the effort to create a wolf management plan has been filled with conflict.
"Thousands of hours have been devoted to this in the last four years," he said. "This is one of the biggest challenges we've faced as an agency."
6 comments:
And you know so much about "our ancient circle of life beliefs." Newsflash: Never in our nature circle of life have we humanly planted animals in a geographical area.
I am Colville, grew up on the Colville Indian Reservation. My community and families rely on our elk, moose and deer to survive. In fact, in order to maintain and balance of elk to hunters, we are not all allowed to freely hunt elk, we elk tags are given via a lottery. Gee, perhaps we should create a tag lottery for the wolves? That statement is about as absurd as your claim to know anything about our "ancient circle of life beliefs."
I don't have anything against wolves, but I care more about the survival of my people and our ability to maintain our traditional ways of life and food. Our elders live on the food our younger generations hunt and provide for them. Besides, we weren't the ones who eliminated the gray wolves in the 30s.
Why would you support this - when the goal is to make this breed a game animal? Does not make sense?
Michelle...............thanks for your passionate comments........My information on North American indigenous peoples religious beliefs and environmental practices come from a variety of scholarly sources including William Cronon's CHANGES IN THE LAND and Shepard Krech III's THE ECOLOGICAL INDIAN, among other sources.
Carnivores as well as herbivores were once both revered(and utilized) by native peoples.......one without the other leads to challenges, including forest regeneration and often herbivore overabundance leading to disease and starvation.......and by definition, if all the grazers are killed off, so go the carnivores.......I would think in addition to utilizing the elk and deer in the woods, your community would also be concerned about the overall health of the land you call home.............something that all Americans seem to have a hard time taking care of in an optimum way...........The Wolves came back into your State on their own......just as the Coyotes have spread into the eastern usa on their own.........I say they add something positive on many levels...........And yes, 300 years ago, your people would not have looked to keep them out of your tribal lands.
Good info in this thread, Rick and Michelle. I do think, however, that the coyote introduction was 'human-aided' rather than just on their own. Bridges aren't discriminatory, and allow more than just cars...our fault. Overzealous people/hunters also physically introduced coyotes in the east (what the hell were they thinking?). There's no 'easy' answer here, but a 'wolf lottery' may actually end up a reality (for better or worse). Most people of native American ancestry would welcome wolves in north Alabama (where I live), as most of us realize the land is bereft of anything larger than meso-predators.
Mark........."sweet home Alabama" for everything save Wolves and Cougars......perhaps one day they return to your great State
Self-anointed "experts" from the radical environmental occupiers create facts to fit their idealistic and sophomoric theories, in this case, explaining to a Native American what her cultural belief system should be. Reject these people at every turn. They are liars and backstabbers. They started out guaranteeing payment for wolf predated livestock to initiate wolf introduction, and once the wolf numbers reached the point where there was no turning back they immediately betrayed their word in a typical two-faced manner and announced they would no longer give financial support for financial loses due to wolf damage. Was there ever any doubt that this would be the outcome? The best we can hope for is that the wolf numbers quickly reach the point where we in Washington can list them as a game animal and turn them into a recreational biological unit to control their numbers. Idaho is currently hiring professional hunters to wipe out some of the packs, and we need to insist that our management plan be identical to Idaho's
William,,,,,,,appreciate your point of view...........From my perch, why did DEFENDERS or any other organization have subsidize ranchers and farmers in any way in putting wolves back in the woods,,,,,,,,,maybe the hunters should be subsidizing all of us car owners for the damage deer do to humans every year through collisions with them.......I am sure you are not a proponent of welfare to other groups.........I think the most knowing ranchers and farmers will tell you that they have to be good enough land stewards to make a living with all the cogs in the land in place,,,,,,,,,not strip the earth of all that was here just so life is "easy---I know that we are on opposite sides of this issue.....Let me wish you a fun upcoming Christmas holiday and thanks for reading the blog
Post a Comment