Visitor Counter

hitwebcounter web counter
Visitors Since Blog Created in March 2010

Click Below to:

Add Blog to Favorites

Coyotes-Wolves-Cougars.blogspot.com

Grizzly bears, black bears, wolves, coyotes, cougars/ mountain lions,bobcats, wolverines, lynx, foxes, fishers and martens are the suite of carnivores that originally inhabited North America after the Pleistocene extinctions. This site invites research, commentary, point/counterpoint on that suite of native animals (predator and prey) that inhabited The Americas circa 1500-at the initial point of European exploration and subsequent colonization. Landscape ecology, journal accounts of explorers and frontiersmen, genetic evaluations of museum animals, peer reviewed 20th and 21st century research on various aspects of our "Wild America" as well as subjective commentary from expert and layman alike. All of the above being revealed and discussed with the underlying goal of one day seeing our Continent rewilded.....Where big enough swaths of open space exist with connective corridors to other large forest, meadow, mountain, valley, prairie, desert and chaparral wildlands.....Thereby enabling all of our historic fauna, including man, to live in a sustainable and healthy environment. - Blogger Rick

Subscribe via email to get updates

Enter your email address:

Receive New Posting Alerts

(A Maximum of One Alert Per Day)

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Fwd: Photo essay on wolves in Wallowa County, OREGON..............Our friend Wally Sykes sent this to me for all of you to have a look at...............click on link below to see Wolf prints of the Wolves colonizing Oregon

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: wally sykes <wally_sykes2000@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:01 PM
Subject: Photo essay on wolves in Wallowa County, OR
To: "Coyotes Wolves Cougars..forever!" <rick.meril@gmail.com>


Hey Rick - Link to an interesting blog by the photographer who did the photos for the upcoming 1859 spread: http://wallowawolves.wordpress.com/

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Let us hope that the Western Reporter who wrote the article below...............feeling that Congress could override the Endangered Species Act and give States management responsibility for setting wolf populations does not occur---I know from my own business negotiations that a "Win/Lose" approach by either negotiating side can spell disaster for a truly fair and good feeling outcome resulting for both sides---I root for all stakeholders to use sound science in setting population levels that will allow for long term sustainability of wolves

THEY PUSHED TOO HARD, TOO LONG

Pro-Wolf Groups Blew It

Pro-wolfers don't know when to call it a day and now their time may have come and gone. They might have cut a great deal, but now agencies and sporting groups aren't going to "settle." They're going to Congress for a solution. And will likely get it.

By Bill Schneider, 9-23-10
Everybody who even remotely follows the wolf issue knows how bad it is, politically. About the only way it could get worse would be a wolf breaking into an urban backyard and biting a child.
Federal District Judge Donald Molloy's August 5 ruling putting the Big Dog back on the endangered species list and stopping hunts in Idaho and Montana was that proverbial last straw for a lot of people, even a lot of fence sitters who actually like wolves and supported the reintroduction.
I've written frequently urging stakeholders to sit down, outside of a courthouse, and work out a compromise, but in all these years, at least as far as I know, there has never been even one meeting. Now, I have to think the pro-wolfers blew their chance to cut the best deal they could've gotten. I bet they could've locked in a much higher minimum population level and won other concessions from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the state wildlife agencies, at least Idaho and Montana, but they didn't even try. Instead, they kept going to the courts, and now, they'll be lucky to salvage the integrity of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). 
So, we move onto the next chapter in the neverending story. The plaintiffs might think that's the next round in the courthouse brawl, but not the defendants. They're going to Congress.
As we languish in this ridiculous ego-centric impasse where neither side wants to show a sign of weakness by making the first move, anger has swollen to a point where some agencies and sporting groups refuse to even say the words, "settle" or "settlement"--let alone do it--because they fear it might imply they gave into the "defenders of wildlife." (See the end of the article for some irony on that point.) Even if the plaintiffs had a sudden change of heart and made some "first move" calls, they'd likely get a quick "screw you; we're going to Congress" response.
Congressman Denny Rehberg (R-MT) has already drafted a bill to override Molloy's ruling by prohibiting the wolf from being listed under the ESA and giving "exclusive" management to the states of Idaho and Montana.
"After hearing from Montanans at my listening sessions around the state," Rehberg wrote on his website, "I've taken a first step by having a draft bill drawn up, but before I introduce it, it's important to hear what Montanans think." (Click here to read Rehberg's draft bill.)
Idaho Senators Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, both Republicans, have also drafted a bill to override Molloy's ruling, but it hasn't been posted online yet.
"This legislation will delist wolves in Idaho and permit the State to manage the species effectively and humanely, as we were doing before Judge Molloy's most recent decision to relist wolves," Crapo wrote on his website. 
"Idaho has met and greatly exceeded every recovery goal imposed on the state by the federal government for the gray wolf and has shown that we Idahoans can properly manage the wolf just like any other species," Risch added
The Crapo-Risch bill requires the Department of the Interior to de-list wolves in Idaho and Montana (and amazingly, also in Oregon, Washington and Utah) and leaves Wyoming out there in the cold, by itself, going it alone, just like the Cowboy State likes it.
The clause de-listing in beginning wolf populations in Oregon, Washington and Utah should give the greens a wake-up call. Those populations are small, struggling and obviously still endangered, but if the Idaho Senators have their way, they'll lose all federal protection.
And moving a little slower, but with the same motivation, Montana's Senators, Max Baucus and Jon Tester, both Democrats, are also working on a "legislative solution," as are the delegations in Texas and other western states.
To me, all this says something is likely to happen; it isn't just the normal, knee-jerk reaction, congressional saber rattling you often hear. Forget science. It had its chance. Now, it's all politics, and nobody is even trying to pretend otherwise. I believe the Rehberg or Crapo-Risch bills, if passed, would be the first time Congress has ever intervened to make a species-specific decision the FWS, the agency charged with administering the ESA, is supposed to make.---THIS MUST NOT HAPPEN--BLOGGER RICK WEIGHING IN 
I can assure you that the plaintiffs don't want to see this happen, but if they'd like to blame somebody for it, they should look in the mirror. They pushed too long, too hard.
Anti-environmental, pro-development groups have been chomping at the bit for decades to "fix" or "enhance" the ESA. Now, wolf advocates may have given them their chance and possibly jeopardized the integrity of what's widely considered the most powerful environmental law ever.
 When it gets opened up for amendment, for any reason, back at our big sausage factory in Washington, D.C., anything can happen--and it's unlikely to be a good thing. And once the precedent is set, de-listing advocates will routinely go back to Congress for resolution instead of fighting long, losing court battles.
The plaintiffs and other pro-wolf groups, heavy on the east and left coasts, believe they have the power to prevent any opening of the ESA. Well, regrettably, we'll soon see if their confidence is well founded.
My reading of the tea leaves tells me we have so much anger and frustration pushing for a congressional "solution" to the wolf issue that it could easily and quickly happen--something like a midnight rider tacked onto a big must-pass bill without debate or hearings (it happens all the time, folks) in the upcoming lame-duck session. And presto, it's over; the wolf is de-listed.
That might be a the right ending for the neverending story, but it sure seems like the wrong way to write the last chapter.---we must stop this from happening--Blogger Rick again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
Plaintiffs: There has been lots of news coverage about EarthJustice suing "on behalf of 13 conservation groups," but not much on who they are. So, here's the list: Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Cascadia Wildlands Project, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Clearwater, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Hells Canyon Preservation Council, Natural Resources Defense Council, Oregon Wild, Sierra Club, The Humane Society of the United States, Western Watersheds Project, and Wildlands Network
Irony: Not many people remember it, but the Sierra Club, a plaintiff, and the National Audubon Society, not a plaintiff, opposed wolf reintroduction and actually sued, unsuccessfully, to stop it. Then, as soon as agencies declared wolf recovery a success and started pushing for de-listing, the Sierra Club joined the other plaintiffs and has been fighting in the courts for years to stop it. Go figure.
More Irony, Defending Defenders: Some anti-wolfers generally and incorrectly refer to plaintiffs as the "defenders of wildlife," and it isn't a compliment. In fact, "defenders of wildlife " has become sort of a moniker for radical eastern environmental groups. Yes, Defenders of Wildlife was the lead conservation group responsible for bringing the wolf back to the northern Rockies and worked hand-in-hand with the FWS and state wildlife agencies to cooperatively make it happen, but ironically, then and now, I view Defenders of Wildlife as among the most reasonable and moderate in the Plaintiff Pack.

We have 100 Mountain Lions in Florida---after importing Texas lions to improve Florida Cat gene pools...............Our Lions need more room to roam...............Do we have the will to permit this??????????????


Florida Panther Outlook Improves


Panther Population Now More Than 100
LABELLE, FL. -- A paper published in the journal "Science" on Friday focuses on the long-term efforts of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and partner agencies to improve the health of the Florida panther population. Through a process called genetic restoration, scientists have helped increase the population of 20 to 30 animals in the early 1990s to the current population of at least 100.
Genetic restoration involves adding new genetic material into a small, isolated population that has suffered the ill effects of inbreeding. Before genetic restoration, many panthers were diagnosed with heart problems, fertility issues, and low levels of genetic variation. To address these problems, scientists introduced eight female pumas from Texas to breed within the dwindling Florida panther population in 1995.
"We are excited by the success of this project," said Dr. Dave Onorato, FWC biologist. "We now have a larger, healthier population that more closely resembles what we would have expected to find in the once-widespread Florida panther population before it became reduced in numbers and isolated in South Florida."

This project has played an important role in the improvements to the health and size of the panther population in Florida. However, other factors, such as land preservation, wildlife underpasses and cooperative agreements between private landowners and non-governmental organizations also contributed to the population increase and will continue to play an important role in the recovery of panthers.

Genetic restoration of the Florida panther has been a multi-agency effort involving the FWC, the National Cancer Institute, the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and many non-governmental organizations. These agencies worked with world-renowned experts in conservation genetics and the management of large carnivores to produce the Plan for Genetic Restoration in 1994.

Funding for panther research and management conducted by the FWC comes exclusively from fees collected when Florida residents purchase "Protect the Florida panther" specialty license plates. People wishing to replace a license plate with one of these tags can do so at any tax collector's office.
_______________________________________

How to Restore the Florida Panther: Add a Little Texas Cougar

Introducing female cougars from Texas has helped the Florida big cats rebound
By David Biello   |September 24, 2010
    .

 FLORIDA PANTHER: The Florida panther has rebounded from 26 or so individuals to nearly 100, thanks to wildlife managers importing eight female Texas cougars, their close relatives. Image: © Science / AAAS
A relatively small stretch of swamp between Miami and Naples in south Florida was the only place on Earth where the Florida panther lived 20 years ago. In fact, scientists estimate that only roughly 26 of the animals that once roamed the entire Southeast remained in that swamp, many stunted by genetic defects brought on by inbreeding. In a bid to stave off the same kind of extinction that had wiped out all other mountain lion subspecies (also known as cougars, panthers or pumas) east of the Mississippi, wildlife managers imported eight female cougars from Texas in 1995. It worked. Today, the vigor of the Florida panther is back, according to a new genetic survey published September 23 in Science.

"In the early 1980s and 1990s they were so inbred that they were unhealthy," explains wildlife biologist Dave Onorato of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, a co-author of the paper. "Genetic restoration has made for a healthier population and population has increased in size since then."

In fact, using samples from 591 individual Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi) collected since 1981, the scientists traced the bloodlines of the panthers alive today—including the 424 documented panther births since the Texas cougars arrived. The offspring of the original panther population and the imported pumas rapidly grew to as many as 95 adult big cats ranging across Big Cypress National Reserve and other remaining habitats. And this genetic restoration might provide a model for efforts to conserve dwindling big cat populations around the world.
View a slide show of Florida panthers

The scientists also collected their own samples, using houndsmen and their trained bloodhounds (also from Texas) to tree the big cats. But the pumas with Texas lineage proved harder to capture. "The admixed cats, on average, resisted capture more energetically, were more likely not to stay in the first tree that they climbed to avoid the dogs," says geneticist Warren Johnson of the National Cancer Institute's Laboratory of Genomic Diversity in Frederick, Md., lead author of the report.
The population growth, of course, was also helped by the protection of some 120,000 hectares of habitat as well as the construction of highway underpasses to cut down on road kill (10 to 20 pumas are killed every year this way, according to Onorato). But, in a sense, the original inbred population of Florida panthers is now gone, replaced by hybrid descendants with genes from Texas and Florida. Only two females from the "canonical" Florida panther population remain, and the purebred Florida males are less likely to win their battles for territory. "As you become an older fellow your chances of winning a bar fight go down," Onorato says, also noting that Texas and Florida puma populations used to swap genes via ranges that covered the entire Southeast only a century ago.
Territorial battles between pumas are becoming more common as the population rebounds but remains confined to a relatively small habitat. "Finding a way for panthers and people to coexist in Florida—and preserving enough good wilderness for panthers in Florida—that's really what's going to help them the most," Onorato says, noting that it might make sense for the pumas to recolonize central Florida—or even beyond. Johnson adds: "There are many places on the east coast where panthers would flourish, and they eventually may naturally repopulate the region."
But given human demands on the panther's hunting grounds for agriculture and development (and on pumas themselves; hunters killed some 800 pumas a year in Montana alone in the late 1990s), the Florida panther remains imperiled. And that means Florida panthers will likely remain in continual need of imported mates. "Unfortunately, it will have to be done again," Onorato says. "It's just a matter of when."

Or, as ecologist Craig Packer of the University of Minnesota puts it in a commentary on the results also published in Science: "Once the entire planet reaches the same state of economic development and urbanization as the United States, wildlife managers all over the world can look forward to carting rare species from one park to another until the end of time."---Blogger Rick chiming in here and hoping for all of us that we somehow find it within our human nature not to reach the point where our wild cousins are unable to taverse across the landscape under their own power---the very goal of re-wilding encompasses the creation of wild land corridors linking large reservoirs of open space---let us work on the Cougar spreading up and down the Appalachians and again across the bottom tier of Southern States linking up with Texas populations of Mountain Lions

.

 

An Overview of the status of the Wolf in Quebec, Canada by Helene Jolicoeur and Michel Henault----- Parks Quebec(2003)

As of the most recent information that I could find on the status of Wolves in Quebec, Jolicoeur and Henault
report that Wolves are found throughout Quebec...............both C.lupus(gray) and C. Lycaon(Eastern)...........Adding to the "Canid Soup" of the region is the Eastern Coyote(C.latrans) found in the Southern regions of Quebec. The bigger Gray Wolf resides in the Northern stretches and the Eastern in the more mid and Southern regions.............The Coyotes tend to occupy the Southern sectors................approximate land area where wolves and coyotes overlap is roughly 25% of Quebec.
Where deer and Moose are both available, wolf packs number 5 to 7 individuals............where it is just a Moose prey system, pack size averages 3 to 4 Wolves. 6 to 7 pups per litter is the mean reproduction occurence.
Wolves are considered Furbearers and small game in Quebec and can only be hunted and trapped with a license from the end of October thru end of March(as many of you know, Wolves and Coyotes tend to mate and breed in mid Winter and pups are born in the Spring...............seems the bagging season extends a tad long when you take into account pregnant females being hunted and trapped in Feb and March).
Wolf mortality ranges from 35 to 55% in Quebec.........human trapping, shooting and road kill account for 25 to 30 % of overall mortality..........Game Managers will tell you that to reduce wolf populations requires north of 50% mortality so there are likely areas of Quebec where humans are stressing wolf populations......................what Paul Pacquet, Camilla Fox, Linda Rutledge and many other Wolf researchers will also tell you is that Game Managers have to take into account more than just number of individuals in a population----they need to take into account the fact that social pack animals like wolves get terribly disrupted by intense human hunting and trapping----young wolves not able to train pups effectively, increased killing of livestock occurring.............increased native prey killing as well...........it is just not a numbers game when it comes to wolves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--blogger Rick

Friday, September 24, 2010

OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE AND THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA IN TERIFFIC PARTNERSHIP TO "WILD CONNECT" NOVA SCOTIA AND NEW BRUNSWICK

OSI and Nature Conservancy of Canada Team up on Transborder Efforts

Mt. Elephant Transborder

Mount Elephant and Green Mountains, Canada      

Using two grants from OSI's Transborder Land Protection Fund, The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) has protected almost 1,200 acres of natural habitat—in Baie Verte, along the Chignecto Isthmus, the "land bridge" that connects the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, and in the Green Mountain range, just north of the Vermont border.

The coastal (Baie Verte) property acquired by NCC represents one of the largest remaining undeveloped properties along the southern reaches of the Northumberland Straight, making it critical habitat for protection. The area's expansive salt marshes, eel grass beds, tidal creeks and mixed forests are homelands for numerous species of birds and larger mammals such as black bear and moose. A section of the Chignecto Isthmus, the property forms part of the narrow but ecologically important link connecting Nova Scotia to the rest of Canada and permitting wildlife movement between the two provinces.

The newly-protected property was one of 10 "Gifts to Canadians" announced June 22 to honor the country's 143rd birthday. OSI supported projects in the Chignecto Isthmus, including the Baie Verte property, through a $90,000 grant from the Transborder Fund.

If not protected, the mature forest, freshwater wetlands, salt marsh, dunes, beaches and wooded islands would most likely be subdivided and developed for second homes.

"Today is a very special day as we celebrate the protection of one of Canada's most sensitive areas," said Linda Stephenson, regional vice president for the Atlantic Region of NCC. "The almost 160-acre property with sand dunes, mature forest, wetlands and beaches is now safeguarded forever as a symbolic gift to all Canadians. Being one of the last remaining undeveloped properties along New Brunswick's Northumberland Straight, NCC couldn't have achieved this significant feat without the generous support of all of our partners."

In June of 2009, the Open Space Institute launched the $1 million Transborder Land Protection Fund, which, together with Two Countries, One Forest and other partners, aims to unify land protection efforts on both sides of the international border, creating alliances that strengthen the forest connectivity that is vital to local economies and the biodiversity of this globally unique region.

The other NCC effort, which received a $100,000 Transborder grant, protects two properties totaling more than 1,000 acres in the town of Sutton, in the northern Green Mountains.

NCC has already protected 17,000 acres in the region, which has become a model for Transborder cooperation and is an essential wildlife corridor from Vermont into Quebec for more than 50 different at-risk species.

The area contains large blocks of forestland, ravines, summits and steep slopes that make it both unique and ecologically important. Despite the economic climate, this area has remained a popular market for vacation homes on waterfront and mountaintop properties. Nature Conservancy Canada, and its partner organizations The Trust for Public Land and Appalachian Corridor Association, have worked extensively with local constituencies to protect land on both sides of the international border, creating significant conservation connectivity.

OSI's grant will complement those conservation successes.

 


     

 

   


Open Space Institute
1350 Broadway, Suite 201
New York, NY, 10018
212 290 8200              212 290 8200      
Powered

Columbia Highlands Initiative in Washington State an attempt at connecting the Cascades and the Rockies--rewilding to follow........working Ranches to be preserved

Groups announce new effort for wilderness and working lands in Washington

Innovative partnership draws on ranching, timber, and conservation interests to keep Cascades connected to the Rockies

The Columbia Highlands Initiative, unveiled today at simultaneous press conferences in Spokane and Seattle, seeks to maintain an important habitat connection between the Cascades and Rockies by protecting wild places and sustaining working ranches and jobs in the woods in the Columbia Highlands region of northeast Washington.

Groups announce new effort for wilderness and working lands in Washington

Abercrombie Mountain is being proposed for wilderness designation

 
Jul 28, 2010

Spokane and Seattle, WA – A partnership of conservationists, timber industry leaders, recreationists and ranchers announced today a new collaborative initiative aimed at addressing threats to wildlife as well rural economies posed by pressures from overdevelopment and climate change. The Columbia Highlands Initiative, unveiled today at simultaneous press conferences in Spokane and Seattle, seeks to maintain an important habitat connection between the Cascades and Rockies by protecting wild places and sustaining working ranches and jobs in the woods in the Columbia Highlands region of northeast Washington.

 Over the last eight years, timber industry and conservation leaders, collaborating through the Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition, have produced a national success story in simultaneously advancing forest stewardship and timber harvest on the Colville National Forest. The Columbia Highlands Initiative, led by Conservation Northwest and The Lands Council, seeks to extend that collaborative success by promoting thoughtful recreation access, sustaining working ranches and advancing a plan for national forest management that includes a balance of uses including new wilderness areas.

 "The pressures and changes of the modern world require us to take a new, collaborative approach to conserving our wildlife, natural areas, and traditional rural lifestyles," said Tim Coleman of Conservation Northwest. "We can't do it without working together on the big picture: maintaining wildlife pathways and healthy forests, also means that we need to maintain our timber jobs and the large habitat-rich ranches."

 The key elements of the group's proposal includes: 1) the designation of new national conservation, national recreation and wilderness areas in the Colville National Forest, 2) support for ongoing national forest stewardship projects, and 3) collaborative work with ranchers, including raising private funds for easements, to keep several key ranches in operation for cattle production and that provide essential habitat for wildlife. 

 Ultimately, formal designation of Wilderness, National Conservation Areas, and National Recreation Areas will require an act of Congress.  Additionally some funding may needed as well.

  "We're deeply appreciative that members of our state's congressional delegation, particularly Senator Cantwell and Rep. McMorris Rodgers, have been closely following our outreach efforts," said Coleman.    "They have consistently voiced their support for our consensus-building approach.  We look forward to working with them on our ultimate goal of moving legislation through Congress."

 "My grandfather started our family milling business and my dad followed in his footsteps and now I follow in his," said Russ Vaagen, manager of Vaagen Bros. Lumber . "Community collaboration has worked for our business, and in these tough economic times, that has helped keep our workforce on the job. There's an acceptable balance in both sustaining jobs in the woods and protecting some special places," Vaagen said.

 Some local ranchers have gotten involved in the effort because they recognize that changes to the land threaten their cattle business and the open spaces that enhance their lifestyle. They are collaborating with conservation groups to permanently commit key ranches to agriculture, open space and wildlife habitat, preventing real estate and mining developments that break up operations and harm the natural and agricultural heritage. "When the property around us starts growing houses instead of grass and trees, that hurts us and the wildlife," said Ferry County rancher Bryan Gotham. "This partnership is helping us keep the land the way it was in my grandfather's time, with a quiet backcountry that we can access by horse and a means to keep our ranch economically viable so I can pass it on to my children when the time comes."

 The Columbia Highlands Initiative also aims to increase recreation access and tourism in the region by convincing Congress to pass legislation that would establish National Recreation Areas, National Conservation Areas, and new trails for mountain bikes and off-road vehicles. New wilderness areas proposed in the package would also be an added tourism draw to the region.

 "We want a balance where wildlife and wildlands can contribute economically," says John Eminger, owner of 49 Degrees North Ski Area and a partner in the effort. "Wildlife and wilderness is an important part of the overall reason why people enjoy coming to recreate here. We want it to stay that way."

 Wilderness is seen by many traditional backcountry enthusiasts who enjoy the slower, quite pace of hiking or horseback riding as a way to keep a little piece of northeast Washington the way its always been. Many hunters also see wilderness as a way to maintain opportunities for pursuing deer, elk, bear and other game away from roads and crowds where hunting success can be greater and the size of some game bigger. "Wilderness areas ensure that those of us who prefer putting in the effort for a traditional hunt on foot or horseback will still have places like the Kettle Crest or Salmo Priest area to share with our children and grandchildren even with ever expanding development pressures," said Joe Mirasol, a resident of Elk, WA, and chair of the WA chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers.

 The northeast corner of the state still exemplifies the mystique of the western frontier: local, family-owned mills still thrive, many family ranches still make their living off the land, and wild mountains and forests still provide habitat for a wide range of wildlife – from caribou to grizzly bears to Canada lynx – found few other places in the U.S. outside of Alaska. Scientists have also identified the Columbia Highlands region with its intact wild areas and open space as an important region for wildlife to travel between the Cascades and Rocky Mountains.  This is particularly important as development continues to encroach on the remaining intact wildlife habitat.

 "If we are proactive now, our efforts to conserve crucial wildlife habitat here will be considerably more productive in both sweat equity and financial investment. Waiting or doing nothing will only bring the inevitable: loss of important wildlife habitat and greater, more expensive efforts to protect what is left," says Mike Petersen of The Lands Council.

 "Avista has a long-standing commitment to balancing environmental stewardship, economic development and supporting our communities. We support the efforts of the Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition because we believe working together is key to building a better energy future," said Ron Gray of Avista's Kettle Falls Generating Station, who serves on the board of the coalition. "This collaboration is an example of taking care of our natural resources so that those resources will continue to take care of us."

 

     
     
     
     
     

    Noted Wolf and Grizzly Researcher, Paul Pacquet recently published a peer reviewed analysis exploring Animal "feelings" and emotions--like us human animals, our wild cousins(especially mammals) feel joy, pain, fear---the full gamut of emotions that sentient creatures feel day in and day out

    "Human activities deprive wild animals of their life requisites by destroying or impoverishing their surroundings, causing suffering of individuals. Yet, the notion that animal welfare applies to wildlife has escaped many animal welfarists and conservationists. A well-accepted and applied ethical foundation for animal conservation that considers animal welfare is lacking."--Paul Pacquet
    With the recent Time Magazine cover story on animals ability to learn, feel and think and with yesterdays Posting regarding Linda Rutledge's findings on how human culling of other animal populations(wolves) result in chaos and confusion amongst surviving Pack members............thought that Paul's very cogent and thorough Paper on Animal feelings and human beings impact on their well being was timely to share with all of you.

    Thursday, September 23, 2010

    We all know that land preservation and protected corridors are the key ingredients to ensure that our native predators persist and thrive into the next Millenium............my home City of Los Angeles is the focus of a study on the potential for expanding the protected acres of the Santa Monica National Recreation Area......a true jewel in heavily urban SoCal




    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Kellett [mailto:kellett@restore.org]
    Sent:
    Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:55 PM
    Subject: NPS Rim of the Valley Study, Topanga Messenger, 20100923

    VOL.34  NO.19
    9/23/2010-10/6/2010
    NPS Rim of the Valley Study
    The National Park Service (NPS) is hosting the first of many public meetings throughout the area to seek public comment on the Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study.
    The four-year study will look at the potential for expanding the boundary of Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (SMMNRA), a unit of the National Park System since 1978. SMMNRA includes 150,000 acres of private, local, state and federal lands under a unique partnership umbrella.
    The study area covers more than 650,000 acres of the mountains encircling the San Fernando, La Crescenta, Santa Clarita, Simi and Conejo Valleys of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, as well as the majority of SMMNRA and portions of the Angeles National Forest that serve as the headwaters of the Los Angeles River. Approximately half of the acreage of the study area is publically owned.
    The study will respect existing land uses, current land management efforts, and private property rights. Recommendations may relate to the entire study area, or only portions of it.
    The study, carried out over the next four years, will provide opportunities for public involvement throughout the process and for the NPS and local communities to think creatively about how to care for the resources that they value in their communities; how to tell the stories of the important events that occurred there; how to protect significant natural and cultural resources while providing for a high quality of life; and how to highlight the uniqueness and vitality of a given area.
    Meetings closest to Topanga will take place on Tuesday, September 14, 7 to 9 p.m., at the Mason Recreation Center, 10500 Mason Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311 and Monday, October 4, 7 to 9 p.m., at King Gillette Ranch, Dormitory Bldg., 26800 Mulholland Hwy., Calabasas, CA 91302.
    The initial public comment period extends through October 29, 2010, with additional public input opportunities throughout the four-year study process.
    For more information contact Anne Dove, Project Manager at (323) 441-9307 or e-mail the study team at pwr_rimofthevalley@nps.gov.
    A newsletter, maps and more information are available at: www.nps.gov/pwro/rimofthevalley.


    Linda Rutledge and fellow Trent U. Researchers pounding home the point that it is not enough for Fish&Wildlife agencies to establish harvest levels simply based on maintaining a certain population size..............family structure must be factored into the equation as well..........especially with sentient social animals like wolves

    Back in the Family



    Wolf pack structure recovers after hunting ban
    Family albumWolves in Canada's Algonquin Provincial Park have reassembled into natural packs after a hunting and trapping ban took effect, even though the animals' numbers have remained steady.
    The finding, reported in Biological Conservation, suggests that measurements of factors other than population size are needed to shape conservation policy.
    Researchers tracked 112 eastern wolves (Canis lycaon) in the park after the government issued a harvest ban in nearby towns. While deaths due to hunting and trapping decreased, the population density stayed around three wolves per 100 square kilometers, mainly due to deaths by natural causes. Analysis of blood samples, however, showed a dramatic change in wolf pack structure.
     Before the ban, 12 out of 15 packs contained unrelated wolves; after the ban, that number dropped to one out of 17 packs.
    The newly restored social structure could benefit the population, the authors say. Studies of other species have shown that tight familial bonds can improve reproduction rates and lower stress. Conservation policies should "look beyond numbers," the team argues, and consider social patterns as well. – Roberta Kwok
    Source: Rutledge, L., Patterson, B., Mills, K., Loveless, K., Murray, D., & White, B. (2009). Protection from harvesting restores the natural social structure of eastern wolf packs Biological Conservation DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.017

    Maybe we human animals are the true "NUISANCE.........

    N.J. nuisance black bears out fattening up for winter

     

    bear072110_optWildlife officials remind resident to remove food sources

    "Hey, how come there's nothin' good around here to eat?''

    State environmental protection and wildlife officials are hoping that would be the complaint of New Jersey's troublesome black bears as they attempt to fatten up for winter hibernation with the arrival Wednesday night of autumn.

    Wildlife biologists are reminding residents who live in bear country to remove food sources from around their homes to prevent what they describe as difficult encounters with bears this fall.

    By taking precautions, such as properly securing trash and limiting sources of food, such as birdseed and pet food left on decks and patios, residents can make a major difference in reducing the risk of bad encounters with bears.

    "If you live in areas frequented by bears, try to ensure they will not find food near your homes,'' state Environmental Protections Commissioner Bob Martin said Wednesday. "Bears will naturally take advantage of easy meals by searching through unsecured garbage cans and dumpsters, or raiding birdfeeders. This can lead to problems for the bears and the community."

    In New Jersey, it's illegal to feed bears, and violators face a penalty of up to $1,000 for each offense.

    But even unintentional feeding, by leaving out trash or other food sources, can have serious consequences for residents living in bear country, and also for the bears.

    Black bears will take advantage of an easy meal and often return to an area where they find food around people's homes, DEP Division of Fish and Wildlife Assistant Director Larry Herrighty said. Bears that learn to associate food with people can become a nuisance, are more likely to damage property or exhibit aggression, and may have to be destroyed to protect the public.

    A majority of New Jersey's rising black bear population lives in the northwestern portion of the state, but sightings have been reported in all 21 counties, with increased sightings in more urban areas in recent months. But the mere presence of a black bear in residential areas is not considered a problem, if a bear is exhibiting normal behavior.

    The DEP offers these tips to avoid conflicts with bears:

    Residents who encounter a bear should remain calm. Do not block a bear's potential escape routes. Do not run. Do not feed the bear. Avoid direct eye contact, back up slowly and speak with a low, assertive voice.

    Residents living in areas frequented by bears are also advised to take the following precautions to minimize bear encounters:

    • Never feed a black bear.
    • Use certified bear-resistant garbage containers. They offer the best protection. Otherwise, store all garbage in containers with tight-fitting lids and place them within a secure location, where bears are unlikely to see or smell them.
    • Put out garbage on collection day, not the night before.
    • Wash garbage containers frequently with a disinfectant solution to remove odors. Draping rags soaked in bleach over your garbage containers also helps to eliminate odors.
    • If you choose to feed birds, do so during daylight hours only, between Dec. 1 and April 1, when bears are least active. Suspend the birdfeeder from a free-hanging wire, making sure it's at least 10 feet off the ground and away from the trunk of a tree. Bring the feeder indoors at night. Clean up spilled seeds and shells daily.
    • Clean up after pets. If you must feed them outside, immediately pick up any leftover food and remove the food bowls after they have finished.
    • Clean outdoor grills and utensils thoroughly after each use and store grills securely. Grease and food residue can attract bears.
    • Do not place meat, dairy or any sweet foods in compost piles.
    • Residents who have fruit or nut trees on their property should recognize that bears may be attracted to any residual fruit or nuts left on the ground. Removing fallen fruit or nuts will minimize bear activity in your yard.
    • Properly installed electric fencing is an effective and efficient way of protecting crops, beehives and livestock.
    • Report bear damage, nuisance behavior or aggressive bears to the local police department and to the DEP's hotline at (877) WARN DEP.










    The state Comprehensive Black Bear Management Policy developed by the Fish and Game Council and approved by Martin emphasizes managing bears through research and monitoring, non-lethal and lethal control of problem bears, public education on co-existing with bears, law enforcement to reduce conflicts between bears and people, and a controlled hunt.

    Wednesday, September 22, 2010

    SOON TO BE OPENED KAWARTHA HIGHLANDS PROVINCIAL PARK IN ONTARIO--A CRITICAL WOLF LINKAGE SOUTH OF ALGONQUIN--AND OUR FRIEND BRENT PATTERSON STUDYING HOW MANY WOLVES,,,,,HOW MANY COYOTES, HOW MANY WOLF/COYOTE HYBRIDS.............BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THEY ALL MAKE DEER AND BEAVER PART OF THEIR DIET DURING THE WINTER MONTHS

    This interview between Ontario Parks and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources research scientist, Brent Patterson first appeared in the June 24, 2010 issue of the Ontario Parks Insider. Brent discusses the wolf research he is conducting in Kawartha Highlands Provincial Park.

    NOTE: This park is not yet operational and there are presently no maintained public facilities or services within the park. The 36,587 hectare park is the largest provincial park in Ontario south of Algonquin Park. The long-term protection of its ecological integrity is of utmost importance.

    Be Wolf Wise: Wolf Research in Ontario Parks

    The wolves of Algonquin and the coyotes in Toronto get a lot of press, but what about the areas where the two species meet? OP Insider sat down with Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Research Scientist, Brent Patterson, to discuss the wolf research he is conducting at Kawartha Highlands Provincial Park.

    Ontario Parks: What research is being done on wolves in the Kawarthas?  
    Brent Patterson
    Hybridization between eastern wolves and eastern coyotes is common and extensive along the southern edge of wolf distribution in central Ontario.  We have been studying the canids in the Kawartha Highlands area for the past couple of years to:  
    • Determine the distribution of wolves, coyotes, and hybrids in the region
    • More specifically determine whether wolves or coyotes are the predominate canid species found in the KHSS park
    • Determine how many packs of each reside within the park
    • Determine if this population is connected with the eastern wolf population in Algonquin
    • If coyote packs are found in the area, determine if they are functioning like wolves (i.e. social, pack-living animals, major predators of deer) regardless of what their DNA says they are?
     
    Ontario Parks: Have there been any significant findings from the research?
    Brent Patterson
    There are coyotes, wolves and hybrids found in the park.  Both coyotes and wolves occupy exclusive territories and live in packs ranging in size from 2 – 7.  There are 4 packs living mostly in the KHSS area.  According to the DNA analysis, the pack in the SW corner of the park is essentially comprised of eastern coyotes, whereas the other 3 contain animals that are either eastern wolves or wolf-coyote hybrids.  Although the territories of some of these animals extend beyond the park, if you tally their numbers, about 16 of these canids called the KHSS home in winter 2010.  Regardless of what their DNA says they are, these animals fed primarily on deer and beaver in the winter.   The 2 packs living in the south of the park spent much of the winter south of the park near Hwy 36 where many of the park's deer migrate to spend the winter.  The northern 2 packs maintained similar territories in summer and winter.  The wolves in the north end of KHSS do appear to be genetically connected to Algonquin Park.

    Ontario Parks: What should people know about living or travelling where there are wolves?
    Brent Patterson
    Wolves and coyotes are wild predators and precautions should be taken to avoid attracting these animals.  This can be achieved largely through proper management of food and garbage.  Normal wolf and coyote behaviour is to be fearful of people and to flee when a person is encountered.  If a fearless wolf or coyote is observed, make loud noise to try and scare the animal and make sure it knows you are a human, and then walk away from the animal while keeping your eyes on it.  The incident should be reported to local authorities immediately. 

    actu
    Ontario Parks: What are the most common misconceptions about wolves?
    Brent Patterson
    People think these animals are much more numerous than they really are and that they eat many more deer and beaver than they
    actually do.


    Ontario Parks: Have there been any issues / problems caused by the wolves in the Kawarthas?
    Brent Patterson
    Not to my knowledge, other than the fact that many hunters and trappers believe these animals are reducing numbers of deer and beavers in the area. 
    Ontario Parks: Anything the public should know about the research / anyway they can help / should they report a sighting?
    Brent Patterson
    Sightings of radio-collared animals should be reported to the local MNR office.  Details regarding where the sighting occurred, what the animal was doing when sighted, how many others were with it are very helpful.

    WILDLANDS AND WOODLANDS MEETING SET FOR SEPT 29--GOAL AS WE HAVE DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY IN THIS BLOG IS TO SAVE INTO PERPETUITY 50% OF NEW ENGLAND'S OPEN SPACE BOTH FOR WORKING FOREST(WOODLANDS) AND FOR LONG TERM OLD GROWTH(WILDLANDS)--WE APPLAUD OUR FRIEND DAVID FOSTER WHO HEADS UP THE HARVARD FOREST IN MASSACHUSETTS AND IS SPEARHEADING THIS INITIATIVE

    Next Wildlands and Woodlands Partnership Meeting Sept. 29, 2010 at Harvard Forest



    Wednesday, September 29, 1 pm - 4 pm
    Wildlands and Woodlands Partnership Meeting
    Working Woodlands:  Getting the Value Proposition Right for Private Forest Landowners
    Speaker: Dylan H. Jenkins, CF, Director of Land Conservation, PA Chapter of TNC
    Location: Harvard Forest, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, MA
    There will be time in the meeting for extensive updates on the following items and more:

    • America's Great Outdoors Initiative and the Listening Session in Concord, NH - A group of New England conservationists presented information to Secretary Vilsack about how federal resources for forest conservation should be invested to achieve shared goals.  They developed a set of "talking points" that called for the federal government's support of regional conservation partnerships, permanent conservation funding, support for ecosystem markets, forest industry, etc.  Could these talking points help form the foundation for a policy platform that advances conservation across New England? Come to the meeting to learn more.
    • New England Conservation Finance and Policy Platform  -  Conservationists with expertise in conservation, climate change, forestry, and land use policy from across New England will be getting together to discuss the merits of a shared New England-wide policy campaign(s).  
    • Western MA Pilot Aggregation Project and New England Expansion - The New England Forestry Foundation is working with 7 land trusts to help 71 family forest landowners protect over 10,000 acres in Western Massachusetts.  NEFF will provide updates on efforts to apply this model to 14 other locations.
    • Woodland Councils USFS Redesign Grant Project - Four Woodland Councils in Massachusetts and Connecticut were awarded a $200,000 grant from the US Forest Service to provide training and educational programs to landowners, foresters, and municipal officials about conservation easements and their stewardship.
    • Regional Conservation Partnership Gathering Nov. 15 - Coordinators of existing and emerging partnerships are gathering in southern Maine on Nov. 15 at the Wells Research Reserve to learn from each other about what works best in collaborative conservation.  If you are interested in starting a new regional conservation collaboration, this may be right for you. Come to the meeting to find out more, or email blabich@highstead.net to register.
    • Massachusetts Special Commission on Financing Forest Conservation - James Levitt worked with a Special Advisory Committee to a Governor-appointed Commission in 2010 to identify several key strategies for greatly increasing resources to protect more land.  Aggregation, mitigation, and limited development were highlighted.  Are these strategies relevant to other New England states? We'll find out.
    • Regional Plan Association's (RPA) Landscape Conservation Initiative - The RPA recently launched a 3-year effort to promote landscape conservation in the Northeastern United States.  Deliverables include a GIS that places landscape initiatives in the context of conservation opportunities and development challenges; a website and conference to bring landscape professionals together; and a re-grant program in the 3rd year.
    • W&W Stewardship Science Initiative - W&W partner scientists and authors have developed a way for citizens and others to establish and maintain long-term monitoring plots on wildlands and woodlands and a means for uploading their data to an accessible on-line database. Hear more about this initiative and how to participate.
    • The New England Governor's Conference Blue Ribbon Commission on Land Conservation - Now that the NE Governors passed the resolution, what's next for the CLC?  How will they promote their pilot initiatives?
    • Southern New England Forest Management - Bob Perschel, Northeast Director with the Forest Guild, has been chairing this discussion group that includes forestry stakeholders from CT, RI and MA.  What's next for this group?

    Join the Wildlands and Woodlands Partnership

    Help make great conservation happen by doing what you've always wanted to do but with us! Be a part of the next big leap towards doubling the rate of conservation across New England and beyond.  Join us today!
    Wildlands and Woodlands (maintained at Highstead) •  P.O. Box 1097  •  Redding, Connecticut 06875
    Phone: (203) 938-8809              (203) 938-8809       •  Fax: (203) 938-0343 •  info@wildlandsandwoodlands.org
    © Copyright 2010. All Rights Reserved.

    Our friend Dave Hornoff provided this report on Federal Judge Don Molloy--who has been involved with so many of the decisions on wolves and other wildlife as it relates to endangered species listings and delistings

    Meet Donald Molloy...

    Missoula Judge who presided over Wolf Case

    by Dave Hornoff
    Sept. 20, 2010

    BOZEMAN - Dana Christensen remembers teasing his friend Don Molloy when the two were classmates in law school. It would be 10 at night and Molloy would still be hard at his studies in the University of Montana's law library.

    "I'd say, 'Don, you know it's time for you to go home to your family,' " Christensen recalled recently. "If he'd had his way, he would stay in the law library all night long.

    "But he had to sleep and eat once in a while."

    Christensen, now a defense attorney in Kalispell, has since practiced before his old friend, who is now a U.S. District Court judge in Missoula. From what he can tell, little has changed.

    "At 5 p.m., I'd suggest to the court to take a break," he said of a typical day in Molloy's court. "He'd make you go another 45 minutes.

    "Nobody works as hard as Judge Molloy."

    One of five U.S. district judges in Montana, Molloy has presided over some of the most closely watched cases in the state since he took the bench in 1996. His rulings have ranked as the most controversial.

    That's been particularly true in the past 12 months. In that time, Molloy has ruled that Yellowstone grizzlies are still threatened, that the red slurry dropped on wildfires might be illegal and that the Gallatin Crest should be managed more like wilderness.

    Then in August, he passed down a ruling that stands out even in his notorious career as a judge: his finding that the federal government violated the Endangered Species Act when it used the Wyoming state line to determine which wolves are endangered and which aren't. And while the ruling dealt only with the language of the act, it sparked a raucous backlash that had one group calling Molloy "today's biggest threat to wildlife."

    The 64-year-old judge sports a handlebar mustache and an imposing brow, the perfect thumbprint of an Old West marshal. And like a Gary Cooper character, he's prone to speaking frankly and righteously.

    During a 2004 sentencing, he said Rush Limbaugh and other "screaming people" lead people to take a view of government that is so unrealistic that it "surprises" him.

    The next year, he wrote a critical letter to the Bush administration, saying Bush-appointed U.S. Attorney Bill Mercer of Montana broke federal law when he moved to Washington, D.C., to serve as senior aide to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

    At each step, Molloy has generated plenty of newspaper copy. And the cumulative effect has been a feeling in Montana and beyond that Molloy pushes liberal agendas from his bench.

    To read the blogs, Molloy is a "green judge" and "leftist" who, as one man put it in a letter to the editor recently, "would get the trophy for jobs/industries destroyed in Montana."

    But there's more to Molloy than makes the headlines. A workaholic who leaves his house at 5:30 every morning, Molloy is known as a tough Irish Catholic deeply proud of his Navy service and eastern Montana roots. He's the father of five who calls his wife his biggest support system for putting up with his long hours.

    Among lawyers, he's known for being demanding.

    "Everybody knows that you have to do your homework" before appearing before Molloy, said Mike Williams, a Missoula lawyer who taught Molloy at the UM law school. "He expects you to own the book and do things right."

    Molloy himself says he has the best job in the world and is unfazed by his critics. The Founding Fathers gave judges lifelong appointments so they could make unpopular decisions. And while he doesn't discuss issues that are still before the courts, he spoke openly in an interview with the Chronicle recently about his life, his service and the state of the American democracy he has sworn to protect. Warning: He's worried.

    ***

    Donald W. Molloy was born in Butte in 1946 to Daniel and Rita Molloy, the second of eight children.

    His father, a Butte-born Irish Catholic, worked in the copper mines, then attended Carroll College for two years before enlisting in the Army Air Corps and flying 30 missions over Europe during WWII. After the war, the decorated pilot earned his medical degree and set up a practice in Malta in 1951.

    "He was kind of our medical facility for a number of years," recalled Sharon Emond, curator of the Phillips County Museum where many of the late doctor's tools are now part of a display on rural medicine.

    Being raised by a man who knew the toils of a copper mine in a farming and ranching community on the eastern plains made an impression on Molloy, the judge said.

    "Being from a blue-collar family from Butte and living in a community of farmers and ranchers, they don't have the luxury of saying, 'I'm going to work at 9 o'clock,' " he said. "When you're a doctor in Malta, you don't say, 'I'll be in at 8.' When there're two of you there, one of you is going to be at the hospital all the time."

    Childhood friend Terry Stiles, who still ranches near Malta, described Molloy as a "hard-nosed" and fiercely competitive kid.

    "He just did not like to lose at anything," Stiles said. "In football, he would try to go around you one time. If you tackled him hard, he would act like he was going around you the next time, but then run right over you."

    Molloy went on to play running back for the University of Montana Grizzlies, where he enrolled in 1964. To this day, UM football games are one of his few respites from his chambers, he said, and he tries to get to every home game.

    He moved to Missoula during a tumultuous chapter in UM history. Students were protesting the Vietnam War and challenging convention.

    "I remember having a pretty traditional view of the world ... having the American view of things, then coming over here and being exposed to things I'd never heard or read," he recalled in an interview with the Missoulian last year.

    As graduation approached at UM, he was "sweating the draft" and struck up a conversation with some Navy recruiters who were on campus. They talked him and a friend into taking a test to become fighter pilots for the Navy, and for the next five years, Molloy flew F-4 Phantom fighter planes off the deck of the USS John F. Kennedy.

    The aircraft carrier was scheduled to do two tours in Vietnam while Molloy was there, but both times it was diverted to the Mediterranean because of flare-ups in the Middle East, he said. Still, he had major reservations about the Vietnam War, and wrote a letter to then-Sen. Mike Mansfield about his concerns. Mansfield's personally written reply hangs in Molloy's chambers.

    "Basically, he said, 'Look, you've made your views known, now it's the job of the Senate and House to determine what the course of action should be,' " Molloy said. "I recognized we all have a duty to the country. My obligation is one I felt I fulfilled. I did what I was told. It was a formative experience and something I wouldn't trade for anything."

    ***

    That pride was evident in one of his most publicized rulings from the bench.

    In 2006, Molloy heard the case of a Whitefish man who told a probation office he was a Marine veteran and provided photos of himself in a Marine uniform. The claim was false and the photos were frauds.

    In addition to giving the man, William Horvath, four months house arrest, Molloy ordered that he spend 50 hours wearing a sandwich board that would read: "I am a liar. I am not a Marine. I have never served my country. I have dishonored veterans of all wars."

    In 2004, the regional magazine High Country News called Molloy, "One of the greenest judges in the West."

    Among his rulings it cited when making that declaration were: ruling that a family with a cabin inside Glacier National Park cannot drive a snowmobile to it, upholding a federal decision to manage 400,000 roadless acres in the Lolo National Forest as off-limits to snowmobiles and stopping 14 logging projects in 2003 alone.

    But environmentalists contend there are plenty of cases that show Molloy isn't a slam-dunk for green litigants.

    "I think we lose before him more often than we win," said Michael Garrity, executive director of the Alliance for Wild Rockies, which has filed scores of lawsuits challenging national forest logging and grazing projects. "Overall, we win more than we lose, but most of those wins are before the 9th Circuit."

    Recent cases include grazing allotments west of West Yellowstone, which Garrity's group said harmed sage grouse habitat. Molloy allowed the allotments, but was overturned by the appeals court. Twice in the last three months, the 9th Circuit has blocked logging projects that Molloy had allowed to go forward.

    And then came the criminal charges brought against W.R. Grace, the mining company accused of covering up the health effects of asbestos and poisoning generations of Libby residents. Considered the largest environmental crime case in U.S. history, some observers said it was Molloy who led the jury to acquit the three executives on trial.

    At several critical steps, Molloy ruled in favor of the defendants, making the prosecution's case more difficult with each turn.

    "They got away with murder," Libby resident Norita Skramstad told a reporter after the Grace executives were found innocent. "Molloy was their best defense; he won it for them."

    ***

    "I think people are entitled to their views," Molloy said last week. But he added that unpopular rulings are the reason he isn't up for re-election every four years.

    "I have a lifetime job, and part of the reason for judges having lifetime tenure is you're not supposed to be subject to public pressure or discourse. I think this is a wise decision the Founding Fathers made."

    Molloy, who got his job because a Democratic president (Bill Clinton) took the advice of a Democratic senator (Max Baucus), has been called a "Butte Democrat" by many. Molloy says his personal politics are irrelevant, but he likes to point out that one person on Montana Public Radio recently said the problem with Molloy is that he was raised at the knee of a Republican judge.

    That was a reference to James Battin, who served as a Republican U.S. representative from Montana before President Nixon made him a federal judge in Billings. Molloy clerked for Battin, and said no one other than his dad had a larger influence on him.

    Still, politics seem very much on his mind. Reflecting on the importance of the service he and thousands of other men gave in the Vietnam War era, Molloy said he thinks American society since has lost its shared vision.

    "The common good now seems something to be really irrelevant," he said. "Our politics have been reduced to something unrecognizable in a liberal democracy."

    Asked to elaborate, he told a story of visiting Democratic Sen. Mike Mansfield in Washington, D.C., after Molloy left the Navy. Mansfield invited Molloy to join him and Republican Sen. George Aiken of Vermont.

    Molloy learned that Mansfield and Aiken, both powerful members of the Senate, had breakfast together three to four times a week.

    "I challenge you to find that anywhere," Molloy said. "The incivility, the tone, the lack of the ability to listen really has an impact on all of us."

    Missoulian.com


    Tuesday, September 21, 2010

    Our friend John Laundre discussing why Cougars are integral to the health of the Black Hills of South Dakota

    Mountain lions called integral to the Black Hills

     

    The South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks Commission will finalize the proposed 2011 mountain lion hunting on Oct. 6 and 7.

    A New York state wildlife biologist dispelled Saturday what he called some of the myths about the dangers of mountain lions in the Black Hills.

    "Mountain lions are just not that big of a risk to either our game species or to ourselves. They are some of the best wildlife neighbors you can have," John Laundre said during a 90-minute presentation at the annual Black Hills Mountain Lion Foundation Fundraiser held at Black Hills State University's Student Union in Spearfish.

    Laundre, an adjunct professor at State University of New York at Oswego, N.Y., also said the average of 1.6 mountain lions living on every 100 square kilometers of land in the Black Hills makes it one of the highest densities in the West.

    Laundre, who has studied mountain lions for 20 years, said Saturday that means between 85 and 138 adult mountain lions live in the Black Hills area, a number largely based upon the deer population. The professor said 85 mountain lions will kill 2,550 deer annually, and 140 mountain lions will take down 4,200 deer a year.

    "That's if they only eat deer instead of elk, porcupines or other game," he said. "I suspect that there are only about 85 adult mountain lions and more than 67,000 deer. If I had to guess, (human) hunters are taking 12 percent of the deer."

    Laundre said encounters between mountain lions and joggers and hikers or sightings of the animals within neighborhoods do create concerns, but these stories should not frighten people.

    In his 13 years of researching mountain lions in the west, Laundre said he is aware of nine people who were attacked in California that led to two deaths.

    When considering the number of mountain lions and people living in California, it is a small number of encounters, he said.

    More people are killed by deer, dogs, black bears, snakes, traffic accidents, fireworks and salmonella than by mountain lions, he said.

    "I can say a majority of people in the room will never be attacked by a mountain lion. You're much more likely to be attacked by a fellow hiker," the professor said.

    John Kanta, regional wildlife manager for Game, Fish & Parks in Rapid City, sat in on the presentation. While he agreed that people should show more tolerance for the big cats, he disagreed that as few as 85 mountain lions live in the Hills.

    "There are errors with his numbers specific to the Black Hills," he said. "We agree that mountain lions are not killing all the deer and that people should not fear for their lives because mountain lions are in the area."

    The big game populations are dense enough to sustain a hunting season, he said.

    Kanta also doesn't want years of GF&P research discounted either.

    "His numbers are all wrong," he said.

    GF&P estimates that the Black Hills has between 138 and 250 mountain lions.

    Bob Spears of Crow Creek Wildlife Management Service in Spearfish said that the Black Hills were basically a deer park 20 years ago before mountain lions moved into the area.

    "No one wants to eliminate the mountain lions," Spears said. "They have brought the wild back to the deer herds in the Black Hills."

    He said as long as mountain lions live in the Black Hills, people will come to see them.

    Sharon Seneczko, veterinarian and founder of the Black Hills Mountain Lions Foundation, wanted to drive home the fact that mountain lions are needed here.

    "They are important to the ecosystem. We want to see them living here in the long run," she said.

    An era of intolerance in the early 1900s drove the mountain lions to near extinction, Seneczko said.

    "We have to take some responsibility to preserving them," she said.

    That means people living in the forest will have to turn lights on when they go outdoors, watch their dogs and pets when letting them outside, and covering outdoor shelters and kennels.

    It might also mean joggers and hikers have to change their routes and habits, take friends along when on the trails, and avoid jogging and hiking at dusk and dawn, she said.

    "There are a lot of misconceptions about mountain lions. In order to have them here, it requires effort on our part," Seneckzko said.

    She said people have been fortunate to have the Hills repopulated with mountain lions, but that could change.

    "If we're not careful, we may see a decline that they will never recover from," she said.

     

     

    Paul Wilson makes a good point about the fact that the hybridization of Coyotes and Wolves in Eastern North America has given the Eastern Coyote(Coywolf) the vigor necessary to best endure and prosper in a tremendously altered human environment....................my question is on the other themes of the article below that discounts how exotic and introduced alien species can many times disrupt natural systems that have been in place for millenium...............overwhelm sympatric native species in the process..........cause untold ecosystem and monetary havoc for people, other animals and the land

    Alien Species to the Rescue?  

    Naturalists have raised alarms about the growing number of "invasive" species hitching rides to new habitats and devastating local ecosystems. Yet, recent findings say this isn't such a bad thing.


    By Chris Wood
    Naturalists have raised alarms about the growing number of "invasive" species hitching rides to new habitats and devastating local ecosystems. But as wildlife genetics illuminate the genome — the ultimate "barcode" for biodiversity — that assumption is proving shaky. The surprising finding: most transplanted species do not dilute genetic diversity in their new locales and may even enhance it.

    "The vast majority of species that establish in a new place do nothing," says Mark Vellend, Canada Research Chair in Conservation Biology at the University of British Columbia. "Most don't outcompete the natives or cause diseases or screw up their new homes, often displacing but seldom eradicating previous residents and directly enriching local biodiversity in the process. Lizards introduced to Florida from Cuba, for example, possess more diverse genomes than their native cousins.
    Squirrels provide a closer-to-home example: the frontier between the ranges of North America's two species of flying squirrel used to be distinct. Northern flying squirrels occupied conifer and mixed-wood forests from Alaska to Nova Scotia and south-central Ontario. Southern flying squirrels flitted from Florida to the northern fringes of Lakes Erie and Ontario. Encouraged by milder winters in recent years, however, southern flying squirrels have been gliding farther north in recent decades, reaching Algonquin Provincial Park in central Ontario.
    Not surprisingly, the two are now interbreeding, says Paul Wilson, Canada Research Chair in DNA Profiling, Forensics and Functional Genomics at Trent University. Far from posing a threat to biodiversity, he proposes, interbreeding may convey advantages to both original squirrel populations. Southern flyers may acquire some of their northern counterparts' tolerance for cold, he says, in exchange for "genetic material that might give the resident species some advantage to fighting off pathogens that they were not typically exposed to in a previous climate regime."
    A similar dynamic was seen when coyotes pushed beyond their historic range in southwestern United States.
    "Where wolves were being extirpated and didn't readily hybridize with coyotes elsewhere in North America," says Wilson, "you saw them eliminated from the landscape. But once the coyote hit this eastern wolf range, you started to see hybrids forming, with the genetic potential to become more wolfy or more coyote-like, depending on the environment."
    "In the absence of those coyotes invading," adds Wilson, "it's not entirely clear whether there would be much of a remnant left of those eastern wolves."
    While alarm over a minority of alien species is justified, anything that strengthens genetic diversity is welcome. A varied gene pool means hardier species and more resilient ecosystems. Biodiversity starts here.

    A good starting point for managing the Wolf Population of the Northern Rockies--first step is for The Feds and the States to agree on the same population levels that will exist as a minimum!

    Guest column: Hunters play a critical role in wolf dilemma

     By Chris Naumann, guest columnist

    During the first two weeks of bow season, I have spent five days in the hills hunting elk. The pre-dawn hikes and ridge-top lunch breaks have given me moments of solitude to consider the current predicament involving wolves, the predator's impact on elk, and the important role of hunters in this dynamic. During this time I came up with some conclusions that I think most hunters and conservationists can agree upon:
    * Wolves have fully recovered in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem.
    * Wolves have positively impacted elk populations in other areas where the natural carrying capacity of the habitat had been exceeded.
    * Wolves have disbursed certain elk herds from private to public land.
    * Wolves need to be managed by state wildlife agencies as big game species.
    * Wolves should primarily be managed by quota-based fair chase hunting.
    Generations of hunters are responsible for policies that have protected millions of acres of wildlife habitat and nurtured numerous species back from the brink of extinction. The collective result is the North American Wildlife Conservation Model: a system that keeps wildlife as a public and sustainable resource, scientifically managed by professionals, all built upon the foundation of hunting's conservation heritage. The wolf is once again a part of the greater Yellowstone ecosystem and therefore hunters will continue to play a critical role in their future.
    The recent court decision relisting wolves as endangered species is based on one simple fact: You cannot have a species protected as endangered on one side of an imaginary line while the same species is unprotected on the other side of the line. That line is the boundary separating Wyoming from Montana and Idaho. Relisting wolves has further polarized communities in wolf country and created an unfortunate rift between traditional conservation allies such as some environmental and hunting groups. The resulting vehement rhetoric is being fueled by emotion and politics thus making constructive dialogue centered on objective wildlife science difficult at best.
    The first step to moving forward is to establish science-based regional and state minimum wolf populations. In the 2009 delisting rules, the Department of Interior established that wolves would be managed "to average over 1,100 wolves, fluctuating around 400 wolves in Montana, 500 in Idaho, and 200-300 in Wyoming." Contradicting this mandate, the minimum required by the states' plans is only 150 wolves respectively. These disparate population thresholds must be resolved in order to allow for effective state management and consistent hunting regulations.
    State management of wolf populations as wildlife is the only viable option for maintaining a sustainable balance between the keystone predator, its prey, and the habitats within which they coexist. With realistic population objectives, state wildlife agencies can establish hunting quotas necessary to administer fair chase hunting seasons just like they successfully do with other big game species such as mountain lions.
    The fact that wolves were delisted only to be relisted was in large part due to Wyoming's unwillingness to meet the standards of the USFWS and those of its neighbors. To ensure a sustainable wolf population and consistent local management, all three states must commit to comparable plans based on overarching objectives; to date Wyoming has prevented this from happening. Wyoming must now develop an acceptable state management plan to compliment those approved for Montana and Idaho.
    Although debate about the wolf dilemma seems to be dictated in the courtroom or agency headquarters, hunters play a significant role in the ultimate outcome as the true stewards of the landscape and its wildlife. When you take to the hills with bow or gun in hand this fall remember that you, your fellow hunters, and the generations before you are responsible not only for this country's tremendous wildlife heritage but also its future. It has been said that hunters are the glue that binds all the components of the North American Wildlife Conservation Model. As a hunter, I think we are the glue that will solidify sound wolf management plans and finally solve the wolf dilemma.
    Chris Naumann has lived, worked and hunted in and around Bozeman for 17 years

    Monday, September 20, 2010

    Missouri the next outpost for Cougars to colonize on their progression East

    Mountain Lions Possible but Rarely Confirmed in Missouri
    By Bill Graham 
     Mountain lions occasionally wander into Missouri from other states, but there is no proof of a self-sustaining, reproducing population, a wildlife expert said Thursday at a public forum.
    The 10 cases confirmed since 1994 by the Missouri Department of Conservation's (MDC) Mountain Lion Response Team are too few to indicate that the big cats have re-established a permanent presence in the state, said Rex Martensen, Private Lands Program supervisor for the MDC.
    "We have not been able to document a reproducing population," Martensen told about 60 people attending the presentation at the Opera House Theatre in El Dorado Springs.

    There have been no mountain lions confirmed in the El Dorado Springs area or surrounding counties by the MDC. The closest cases are a wild mountain lion killed in Kansas City, north of the Missouri River, in 2002, and a video taken in Christian County in 1997 where the animal's behavior indicated it had probably been held in captivity.

    photo
    Photo By Rex Martensen
    lions are also commonly called cougars, panthers and pumas. They were present in Missouri before pioneer settlement. But the last historical confirmed wild mountain lion was killed in southeast Missouri in 1927. The state's forests and deer populations were at a low ebb then, too.
    The big cats survived in the West where hunting traditions for them continue. But wildlife protections have allowed populations in some western states to grow despite hunting, Martensen said. Meanwhile, Missouri's wild lands have rebounded thanks to conservation. Deer and wild turkey, prime food for mountain lions, have returned.

    Most mountain lions confirmed in Missouri in modern times, such as two killed on highways, are young males dispersing from western states and looking for new territory to the east, Martensen said.

    The Black Hills of South Dakota has a mountain lion population and biologists there have put radio collars on some to track movement, he said. Two of those collared mountain lions moved toward Missouri, as one was later killed in Oklahoma and another in central Nebraska.

    The MDC has no programs or intention to release or restock mountain lions into the state, Martensen said. Nor has the department ever put tracking collars on any mountain lions.

    But the department is interested in confirming mountain lions that wander into the state, he said. Anyone with physical evidence such as photos, tracks or scat can contact the Mountain Lion Response Team at mountain.lion@mdc.mo.gov. Digital photographs are a good way to check evidence quickly.

    Mountain lions are a protected wildlife species in Missouri and cannot be killed at will. However, regulations do allow mountain lions to be killed to protect people, pets, livestock and property. Any mountain lions killed should be reported immediately to Conservation Department offices.

    More than 90 percent of reported mountain lion sightings or photographs turn out to be bobcats, house cats, dogs or doctored photographs circulating on the Internet, Martensen said. Bobcats are common in Missouri and often mistaken for mountain lions.

    One myth is the existence of "black panthers." That color pattern or separate species does not exist, he said. However people who keep exotic wildlife sometimes turn loose a black color phase of leopard or jaguar, Martensen said. Authorities have confirmed a few such cases.

    One audience member asked about a calf that was killed. Martensen said he could not be sure of that case since he did not investigate it. But he said there have been no documented cases of livestock damage by mountain lions in Missouri. Most cattle damage comes from free-roaming dogs or coyotes, he said. Mountain lions are finicky cats with consistent habits in how they hunt and feed, and they leave signs in their territories such as scrapes.

    An audience member asked about hearing animal "screams" in the woods, and she wondered if it could be a mountain lion. Martensen said mountain lions do very little vocalizing except in the presence of other cougars in their territory. Foxes, owls and other animals often make screaming noises that can be frightening.

    For more information about mountain lions in Missouri, and tips for identifying signs such as tracks, go to http://mdc.mo.gov/8340 external link .