Visitor Counter

hitwebcounter web counter
Visitors Since Blog Created in March 2010

Click Below to:

Add Blog to Favorites

Coyotes-Wolves-Cougars.blogspot.com

Grizzly bears, black bears, wolves, coyotes, cougars/ mountain lions,bobcats, wolverines, lynx, foxes, fishers and martens are the suite of carnivores that originally inhabited North America after the Pleistocene extinctions. This site invites research, commentary, point/counterpoint on that suite of native animals (predator and prey) that inhabited The Americas circa 1500-at the initial point of European exploration and subsequent colonization. Landscape ecology, journal accounts of explorers and frontiersmen, genetic evaluations of museum animals, peer reviewed 20th and 21st century research on various aspects of our "Wild America" as well as subjective commentary from expert and layman alike. All of the above being revealed and discussed with the underlying goal of one day seeing our Continent rewilded.....Where big enough swaths of open space exist with connective corridors to other large forest, meadow, mountain, valley, prairie, desert and chaparral wildlands.....Thereby enabling all of our historic fauna, including man, to live in a sustainable and healthy environment. - Blogger Rick

Subscribe via email to get updates

Enter your email address:

Receive New Posting Alerts

(A Maximum of One Alert Per Day)

Sunday, May 26, 2013

More good news, this time out of Oregon regarding the new Wolf Management policy just put into law there.........."This agreement gets us back to the wolf plan we thought we had in 2005," said Nick Cady, Legal Director from Cascadia Wildlands............. "Under this agreement, killing wolves should be an option of last resort"........... "Ranchers need to do their part to improve animal husbandry and coexist with native wildlife, and ODFW needs to live up to its mission to ensure abundant populations of native wildlife for all Oregonians"............Wolf recovery remains popular in Oregon............ When the state's wolf plan was developed in 2005, a state poll showed 70 percent of Oregonians supported wolf recovery............... A public review of the Wolf Plan in 2010 generated over 20,000 public comments............... Over 90 percent were in favor of stronger protections for wolves

Settlement Reached In Wolf Legal Fight

rewildinginstitute.com

Conservationists help craft balanced plan; includes stronger legal
standards, improved livestock husbandry, greater public accountability.

Salem, Oregon  –  After seventeen months of grueling negotiations, conservationists, Governor John Kitzhaber, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), and the livestock industry have reached a compromise settlement agreement that resolves a long-running legal battle over wolf conservation in Oregon.

"Oregonians treasure our state's wildlife and want to see it protected," said Dan Kruse, an attorney for Oregon Wild and Cascadia Wildlands. "This settlement will put in place, for the first time, clear standards and public accountability for what must happen before ODFW or livestock interests can kill an endangered wolf, and measures that should reduce conflict between wolves and livestock. I applaud all the parties for coming to this agreement, and in the coming months we will be watching closely to ensure it is faithfully implemented."

OR7, the Oregon Wolf that spent some time in Northern Calif. before returning "home"














On October 5, 2011, a coalition of conservation organizations filed a legal challenge against the state's aggressive killing program that targeted endangered gray wolves. The groups believed the state's actions violated both the state's Wolf Plan and Endangered Species Act. That same day an appellate commissioner with the Oregon Court of Appeals issued an injunction suspending the state's ability to kill wolves on behalf of the livestock industry.

The settlement agreement resolves this legal conflict by establishing a new management framework which more clearly outlines steps that must be taken before the state can again consider killing endangered wolves. The agreement emphasizes the employment of responsible livestock husbandry practices and requires thorough use of proactive, non-lethal techniques to preempt conflict between wolves and livestock.

"We went to court because ODFW was breaking its own rules and state endangered species laws," said Rob Klavins, Oregon Wild's Wildlife Advocate. "This settlement is far from perfect, but it requires more transparency from the state and responsibility from the livestock industry. Now it's up to the agency to honor the terms of the agreement and ensure wildlife management lives up to Oregon's proud conservation values."

Wolves began returning to Oregon in the late 1990s, after being hunted, trapped and poisoned to extinction in the first half of the twentieth century. In 2005, after wolves begin to return to Oregon the state and stakeholders created a wolf plan that prioritized conservation and non-lethal steps to prevent conflict with livestock as the species recovered in our state. When the plan was followed in 2009, conservationists did not oppose lethal action against wolves in Baker County. However, facing increasingly intense pressure from livestock interests, the state initiated a series of aggressive lethal actions against endangered gray wolves in Oregon. Conservationists believed this effort violated both the spirit and the letter of the Oregon Wolf Plan.

"This agreement gets us back to the wolf plan we thought we had in 2005," said Nick Cady, Legal Director from Cascadia Wildlands. "Under this agreement killing wolves should be an option of last resort. Ranchers need to do their part to improve animal husbandry and coexist with native wildlife, and ODFW needs to live up to its mission to ensure abundant populations of native wildlife for all Oregonians."

With support from the conservation community, in 2012 Oregon increased efforts to educate ranchers about the steps that can be taken to reduce the risk of conflict. Simple measures like burying dead cattle, keeping young calves and other vulnerable animals behind fences, and checking cattle more frequently have reduced conflict in Oregon, even as the number of wolves in the state has grown. In 2012, the state's known wolf population grew from 29 to 46, and only four cows were lost to wolves.
"Oregon has a chance to learn from the mistakes of other states and become a model for how to balance conservation values with demands from the livestock industry," said Steve Pedery, Conservation Director for Oregon Wild. "In the coming years, we look forward to working in Salem, at the federal level, and on the ground to advance wolf recovery and restore other important native species in our state."

Wolf recovery remains popular in Oregon. When the state's wolf plan was developed in 2005, a state poll showed 70 percent of Oregonians supported wolf recovery. A public review of the Wolf Plan in 2010 generated over 20,000 public comments. Over 90 percent were in favor of stronger protections for wolves.















While conflict surrounded wolf killing in 2011, other stories inspired hope for Oregon's fragile recovery. A lone wolf left Northeast Oregon and gained international attention when he became the first wolf in Western Oregon since 1947, and then the first wolf in California in nearly a century. The wolf known to biologists as OR-7 and renamed Journey in an international naming contest is now back in Oregon, and has traveled over 3,000 miles in search of a mate.

"This agreement strengthens wolf protections throughout the state and sets in motion recovery across the rest of Oregon and the region," said Josh Laughlin, Campaign Director for Cascadia Wildlands. "Wolves in the Pacific West are just beginning their historic recovery and will greatly benefit from this new management framework."

The settling conservation organizations were represented by attorneys Nick Cady and Daniel Kruse.

Some good news to report--Shows that it is possible to push back on the anti-carnivore people if we persist and bring best science to the discussion--Nebraska Game & Parks has put the brakes on a Puma hunting season for this year......................This is not the end of the discussion on shooting and trapping the big cats,,,,,,,,,,,but suggests that even the pro hunt Commission knows that there is no sound scientific justification to target a recovering population that at best numbers 15-20 individuals..............Quite frankly, it is utter madness and human ego out of control for there even to be a discussion about killing a population of this size

Stand down, hunters: mountain lion season on hold


CHADRON, Neb. — Nebraska's first regulated mountain lion hunting season is on hold.

State Game and Parks commissioners voted unanimously Friday — during a meeting in the heart of Nebraska's cougar country — to stall proposed wildlife regulations allowing mountain lion hunting.

Commissioner Rex Fisher of Gretna called for the delay to give Game and Parks wildlife staffers time to incorporate suggestions heard at the meeting. More than 20 people, most of them area residents, testified in support of a hunting season.










The issue will be addressed again at the commission's July 26 meeting in Lincoln.

More than two dozen opponents sent letters and emails decrying the plan.

Nature photographer Tom Mangelsen, a native Nebraskan who grew up in Omaha, wrote that he was dismayed at the proposal. He said there is no sound scientific justification for a mountain lion hunting season, adding that it simply would be a recreational opportunity for a few hunters.

Under the plan, 100 permits would be issued to Nebraska residents by lottery. One permit would be auctioned to a resident or nonresident. Lottery and auction proceeds would be used for mountain lion management and research.

An estimated 15 to 22 mountain lions live in the rugged Pine Ridge region, where hunting would be permitted, so the area could support the taking of one to three cougars, according to commission studies.

Mangelsen was skeptical. He wrote that the hunting quota reflects a gamble by the commission that Nebraska's recovering cougar population has the numbers to withstand hunting.
“It is illogical that you would promote a hunt in this area of public land that should ostensibly be 'home' to the cougars,'' he wrote.

Proposed regulations would allow permit holders to hunt mountain lions with firearms and archery equipment in parts of Box Butte, Dawes, Sheridan and Sioux Counties that are north of the Niobrara River and west of Nebraska Highway 27.

Commissioner Kent Forney of Lincoln noted that many opponents raised questions about orphaning or killing cougar kittens.

“I don't think we want to shoot kittens or females,'' he said.

Supporters of a season dominated the public hearing.

“The time is now,'' said Stacy Swinney, who lives southwest of Chadron. “This is a predator with no natural enemies.''

Roy Drickey of Spencer, Neb., asked for a statewide season. He said hunting mountain lions in Pine Ridge would push the population down the Niobrara River into the north-central and northeast regions of the state.

“If somebody starts shooting at you, you're going to move,'' Drickey said.

The new season would run Jan. 1-Feb. 9 and Feb. 15-March 31. The three-cougar limit has a caveat that only one female can be killed. The season would end immediately once a female is killed, even if the limit hasn't been reached. Hunters are to check daily to see whether the season is still open.

Mountain lions are native to Nebraska but vanished in the 1890s. The first confirmed sighting of a cougar in Nebraska in modern times was in 1991 in the Pine Ridge. The first cougar kittens were documented in the Pine Ridge in 2007, indicating a resident population.

The Legislature approved a bill last year allowing for a mountain lion hunting season at the discretion of Game and Parks officials.

Nebraska law already allows people to kill mountain lions if they threaten people or attack livestock.

The commission's Big Game Committee of Forney, Mark Spurgin of Paxton and Mark Pinkerton of Wilber will work with the agency's wildlife biologists to prepare a new proposal for consideration this summer.

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Every time a National or State Park is created, there are naysayers who yell "land grab" and Government "overreach"............Think about it though,,,,,,,,,,,what American citizen alive today regrets that the Federal Government bought out landowners to create the Smokey Mtn and Yellowstone Parks..............Does even one New Yorker complain that squatters were booted from Central Park in Manhattan to create this urban oasis?.............Of course not...................And that is why if I were a super wealthy individual like Erivan Haub, Forrest Mars Jr., Hansjoerg Wyss, Louis Bacon, Paul Jones, John Maloneand Ted Turner, I too would be investing with the AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION in their quest to create a Prairie National Park the size of Connecticut in northern Montana..............I would also be joining Burts Bees founder Roxanne Quimby in creating a Maine Woods National Park in New England...........Screw our unimaginative and narrow minded Politicians in D.C. and in our State Houses----Go around them and create large swaths of land interconnected to other large swaths of land and hire biologists to re-wild these regions with wolves, pumas, bison, elk, and every other species that our founders discovered living on this great land circa AD 1500!..............This is my Memorial Day Weekend holiday wish!!!!!!!!!!!

Bison-Loving Billionaires Rile Ranchers With Land Grab in American West

By Seth Lubove -
Bloomberg Pursuits Magazine


Mogul Must-Have: A Serengeti in America's Backyard
"
Bison-Loving Billionaires Rile Ranchers With Western Land Grab
A heard of bison on the Fort Peck Reservation near Polar, Montana. Photographer: Matthew Brown/AP Photo
May 22 (Bloomberg) -- Bloomberg Pursuits shows you how members of the mega-wealthy are snapping up vast tracts of the American West and returning them to their natural, pristine state. The American Prairie Foundation is looking to create a national park the size of Connecticut in northern Montana, but not everyone is pleased. Bloomberg's Adam Johnson explains.
Members of the superrich are snapping up vast tracts of the American West and returning them to their native state. Local ranchers aren't pleased. Illustration: Zohar Lazar/BloombergPursuits
The group plans to populate the sparsely settled scrubland with up to 10,000 genetically pure bison, descendants of the original animals that last thundered across the American frontier of the 1800s, as opposed to today's tamer descendants which have been crossbred with cattle. Photographer: Stan Honda/AFP via Getty Images
Billionaire German retail baron Erivan Haub is just one of the ultrarich on the donor roll of the American Prairie Reserve. Photographer: Alexander Hassenstein/Bongarts via Getty Images


The bison exist  (30 kilometers) away on ranch land owned by the nonprofit Prairie Reserve, which has attracted some $60 million from well-known Wall Street and Silicon Valley financiers, Bloomberg Pursuits will report in its Summer 2013 issue.


Its plan is to buy out Poole's neighbors and assemble as much as 3.5 million acres (1.4 million hectares) of contiguous private and public land -- about a million acres more than Yellowstone National Park to the south -- in a bid to build an American Serengeti, where the deer and the antelope can again play free.
The organization's donor roll reads like a who's who of the ultrarich: billionaire candy heirs Forrest Mars Jr. and his brother, John (combined net worth: $44 billion, according to theBloomberg Billionaires Index); German retail baron Erivan Haub ($4.9 billion); the foundation of Swiss medical device mogul Hansjoerg Wyss ($12.4 billion); and Susan Packard Orr, daughter of the co-founder of Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ) and chairwoman of the David & Lucile Packard Foundation, which has assets of $5.6 billion.

Pure Bison

After cobbling the properties together, the group plans to populate the sparsely settled scrubland with up to 10,000 genetically pure bison, descendants of the original animals that last thundered across the American frontier of the 1800s (as opposed to today's tamer descendants, which have been crossbred with cattle).
They'll mingle with coyotes, prairie dogs and other scourges of the cattlemen with whom the Prairie Reserve is battling (when it isn't buying them out). The group will then allow the public full run of the expanse, much like a national park.
"Think of it like an empty aquarium," says Sean Gerrity, 54, president of and the driving force behind the Prairie Reserve and a former Silicon Valley management consultant. "What we sell is the possibility, and we sell ourselves as the people capable of bringing that vision to fruition."
What especially galls some local ranchers is the presumption that they and their forebears have done little to preserve the environment.

Furry Tanks

"The way we've managed these properties, the wildlife numbers are as good as they've ever been, perhaps rivaling what Lewis and Clark saw -- other than bison," says Leo Barthelmess Jr., who keeps 610 cattle and 700 sheep on 24,700 acres 32 miles southeast of Malta, the main town in Phillips County, where much of the Prairie Reserve's land is located.
Bison, as far as Barthelmess is concerned, are furry, fence-busting, brucellosis-spreading tanks. (Brucellosis being a bacterial infection that causes abortion or premature calving in infected cattle.) "In order to build their 3-to-4-million-acre vision, I can't live here," he says.
Poole helped start the Ranchers Stewardship Alliance, which promotes wildlife-friendly fences, the preservation of sage grouse habitat and other conservation efforts.
"This landscape was broken in the Dust Bowl of the 1930s," Poole says. "Ranchers and the Soil Conservation Service worked and brought this prairie back. It's not pristine; it's restored. It doesn't need to be saved from ranchers; it was already saved by ranchers."

Tempting Cash

Poole says she suspects the Prairie Reserve's cash will prove too tempting for other ranchers to turn down.
"It's really hard for some people to resist that much money," she says. "Most of these people are land rich and cash poor."
The organization doesn't disclose how much it pays for property, but rancher Vicki Olson says it's paid as much as $2,000 an acre, whereas the going rate is typically a quarter of that.
"They want it big, and we have to be gone if they want thousands of buffalo running free," says Olson, who keeps 500 head of Black Angus cattle on 20,000 acres of private and government-leased land 30 miles south of Malta. "There ain't room for the both of us."
The barbs directed toward the Prairie Reserve echo many of the same complaints that accompanied the creation of some of America's national parks and monuments. Former President Bill Clinton's 2001 designation of the nearby 375,000-acreUpper Missouri River Breaks National Monument, for instance -- which limits both cattle grazing and oil development -- is still bitterly resented in the region.

Grand Teton

Few national parks can match the history of rancor that accompanied the creation of the now-hallowed Grand Teton National Park in neighboring Wyoming. Smitten by the scenery after visits to a small precursor to the park in 1924 and 1926, Standard Oil Co. heir John D. Rockefeller Jr. created Snake River Land Co. as a purchasing agent to mask his involvement and keep land prices down.
"Local park supporters often faced hostilities and boycotts of their businesses throughout these turbulent years," according to a U.S. National Park Service history.
Even after Rockefeller bought 35,000 acres for $1.4 million and offered to donate the land to the park service, it took more than two decades before Congress officially expanded the park in 1950.

'Land Grab'

Fear that the Prairie Reserve will obtain similar federal protection is evident in the bright-green signs posted around the area, with "Don't Buffalo Me, No Federal Land Grab!" painted on one side and "Monument Wildlands Reserve" inside a circle with a slash through it on the other.
Prairie Reserve President Gerrity characterizes the ranchers' complaints as a response to a diminishing way of life. "There was a dream of a pastoral existence and tight communities and that together we would have a very honorable lifestyle," he says. "Well, that dream began to come apart right around World War I, and since then, the population decline has been 10 percent per decade in these areas. That is just how things are."
The population of Phillips County fell 21 percent to 4,267 from 1970 to 2010 and dropped by another 139 people as of 2012, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
"We're not responsible for the underlying changes," says Pete Geddes, a Prairie Reserve managing director. "But we are responsible for being at the forefront of environmental change. We have a different idea of what this land should be used for."

National Park

What motivates many of the Prairie Reserve's most ardent supporters is the chance to get in on the ground floor of something as lasting and majestic as a national park. George Matelich, a managing director of New York-based private-equity firm Kelso & Co., joined the cause and then the board after hearing Gerrity speak at a 2006 fundraising dinner at auction house Sotheby's (BID) headquarters in New York.
"I would boil it down to a single line," says Matelich, 56, who owns a vacation retreat in Montana. "How would you like to have had the opportunity to be a co-founder of Yellowstone National Park? This is an opportunity that is personally attractive both because of the scale and the chance to do something for all time -- not for the credit but for the satisfaction of doing it."
F. Gibson "Gib" Myers Jr., a former partner of the $3 billion Mayfield Fund in Menlo Park,California, equates his mission with that of Theodore Roosevelt's. The rough-riding, big game-hunting 26th president of the U.S. established five national parks and signed the powerful Antiquities Act, which allows presidents to unilaterally designate historic monuments.

'Great Park'

Myers, 71, was so taken with the project after an early, rain-soaked visit in 2002 that he agreed to go on the board, and then become chairman, even before the Prairie Reserve had bought any land.
"I can't think of anything better than being a Teddy Roosevelt, the founder of a great park," Myers says. "Companies come and go, but the thought of being involved in something of such grandeur that will last forever is one of my dreams."
Wealthy individuals replacing government as the primary protectors of sensitive land has become popular in recent years, with hedge-fund managers, broadcast and cable billionaires, and Europeans in love with the wide-open American West pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into acquisitions.

Feathered Women

Billionaire hedge-fund manager Louis Moore Bacon has spent more than $400 million on 200,000-plus acres of land in the U.S., including the 172,000-acre former Forbes family ranch inColorado in 2007. Bacon is preserving much of the land -- which includes three 14,000-foot (4,300-meter) peaks -- in its native condition and donated 167,000 acres to the federal government for conservation easements.
Bacon's efforts in Colorado and on additional properties in New York and North Carolina earned him the prestigious Audubon Medal in January, when he was feted at a party featuring five women dressed in only bras and undies and painted and feathered to look like birds, according to a Bloomberg News account of the New York City soiree.
Another billionaire hedge-fund manager, Paul Tudor Jones, of Greenwich, Connecticut, has purchased at least three plots of land around the country, including the 25,000-acre Blue Valley Ranch in Colorado, where he's restored a section of a river known among anglers as a prime trout-fishing habitat.
Media mogul Ted Turner's 2 million acres in 12 states (and Argentina) make him the second-largest individual landowner in the U.S. -- after media baron John Malone, who owns 2.2 million acres in six states.

Forest Land

And in addition to his efforts on behalf of the Prairie Reserve, Wyss, who sold his Synthes Inc. (SYST) in 2011 for $21.3 billion to Johnson & Johnson (JCI), gave $35 million toward a $490 million joint initiative by the Nature Conservancy and the Trust for Public Land to buy 310,586 acres of forest land from Plum Creek Timber Co. (PCL) in northwestern Montana.
Few land buyers can equal the ambition -- and controversy - - of the Prairie Reserve, which is taking advantage of ample adjoining federal land to stitch together its goal of a massive prairie park.
When the Prairie Reserve acquired the 18,177-acre South Ranch on the northern border of theCharles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge in August, for instance, the tract came with state and federal leases on an additional 131,711 acres, doubling the reserve's footprint overnight to 274,000-plus acres.

Labeling Program

Gerrity says he and his colleagues are trying their best to be good neighbors. They buy supplies in Malta and let the ranchers continue to raise cattle for a period after the Prairie Reserve has bought their land. In the works is a wildlife-friendly labeling program for local cattlemen who agree not to shoot prairie dogs or coyotes.
In theory, APR beef -- like dolphin-free tuna before it -- would command a higher price from ecoconscious consumers in New York and San Francisco. "Small steps to a better world," Geddes says during an extended drive through the property.
Take a trip to the Prairie Reserve's expanding empire, and you may wonder what all of the fuss is about. This isn't the land of snowcapped mountains and icy clear streams jumping with trout that Brad Pitt romped through in 1992's "A River Runs Through It," based on the Norman Maclean novella about life in 1930s Montana.
Much of it consists of flat prairie dotted with scrub for as far as the eye can see, broken only by the occasional herd of cattle or sheep or by the swarming box elder bugs that can darken a ranch house window.

'Gumbo'

The logistics of reaching the area alone may put off all but the most diehard of travelers. First, you drive three hours from Billings or four from Bozeman -- the two closest airports with regular service -- to where the paved road ends. From there, it's another hour or so to the American Prairie Reserve headquarters along a network of dirt roads that the occasional precipitation turns into what locals refer to as "gumbo" -- a sticky mess than can quickly swallow a truck's tires.
"We'll be making liberal use of helicopters," Gerrity says of his organization's plans to navigate the area.
Bryce Christensen, the barrel-chested on-site manager for the Prairie Reserve and a 33-year veteran of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, navigates the wet sections of road by barreling his four-wheel-drive pickup truck through the muck, shellacking its body with mud.

Buffalo Jump

The attractions of the land blend the subtle with the historic. Just over the border of the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge is a buffalo jump, a small cliff where Native Americans herded bison to their death. Prairie dog towns are scattered across the landscape, distinguished by their grassless mounds and their frantic chirping when an intruder approaches.
The Prairie Reserve also rebuilt a one-room log schoolhouse that was used from 1942 to 1957, with four desks for the nonexistent students. And everywhere are the ubiquitous barbed-wire fences that Gerrity and his staff are either planning to tear down or make more wildlife-friendly by raising the bottom wire and removing the barbs to allow antelope to scamper through.
Accommodations until now have been Spartan. Prior options included pitching a tent at a campground within whiffing distance of the bison herd or staying in a converted ranch house guarded by a friendly black cat.

Safari Camp

Lodging options are soon to improve, however, once the Prairie Reserve puts the finishing touches on a so-called safari camp consisting of eight yurts -- the Western name for the circular dwellings known in their native Mongolia as gers -- with heating and air conditioning, running water and sweeping prairie views.
While the view from the yurts still looks remote and windswept, Christensen and his colleagues and benefactors at the American Prairie Reserve envision a time when the scenery will be dotted with leaping antelope, thundering plains bison, chirping prairie dogs and the endangered black-footed ferrets whose favorite meal consists of prairie dog.
What's not included in that distant view are the sheep herds, grazing cattle and the long line of ranchers who tamed the land in the first place.
"This is gonna be nice," Christensen says, as an electrician strings wire through one of the yurts.

When North Dakota first allowed a hunting and trapping season on Pumas a decade ago, virtually no information existed regarding the size, health and range of these animals.........This is what we are constantly harping about on this blog...............Science be dammed,,,,,,,,,,,,,Based on the whims of State Game Commissioners(and their influential hunting and agriculture constituents), hunting seasons and quotas of carnivores are willed into law.....With this in mind, a 3 year study by North Dakota Fish & Wildlife and South Dakota State University has finally revealed the following facts: 1) Pumas do not rely exclusively on Elk and Deer for protein............In fact, porcupines, beavers and raccoons are all on their menu............2)Female "cats" first breed at age 3 and only have two to three kittens every 18 months...........Consider the fact that in the wild, a Puma that lived 7 years would be considered old.........This means females might give birth to five kittens in their lives........With this low reproductive regimine, how in good conscience does N. Dakota or any state kill off these animals without truly having a handle on how many of them exist??????????

  • Mountain lion study on track in North Dakota

  • Stephanie Tucker, furbearer biologist for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department, said the study, which began in August of 2011, should be wrapped up in the field this fall.
    •  
  • By Brian Gehring, crookstontimes.com

    Bismarck, N.D.  —  
    At least 16 mountain lions have been captured and collared in the Badlands in a three-year study of what is likely North Dakota's apex predator.
    That's roughly one-fifth the number of mountain lions that have been legally harvested in the state since a season was established in 2005-06.
    Stephanie Tucker, furbearer biologist for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department, said the study, which began in August of 2011, should be wrapped up in the field this fall.


















    The $218,000 study, paid for by Pittman-Robertson excise tax monies, is a collaborative effort between the Game and Fish Department and South Dakota State University.
    Dave Wilckens, a New York native and a graduate student at SDSU, has been on the ground conducting the live trappings in the Badlands since the beginning of the study.
    He said the latest cat was captured at the end of last week. Of the 16 lions that have been collared during the course of the study, Wilckens said 11 are still being tracked, the Bismarck Tribune reported (http://bit.ly/10fyZGQ ).
    He said a couple of animals have been killed during hunting seasons and by vehicles, with a couple killed otherwise.
    Wilckens said he uses road-killed deer to bait foot hold traps or foot snares, usually having one trap active at a time.
    He said the first winter of the study conditions were tough and some traps when undisturbed for months before drawing in a lion.
    Other times, they were effective on the first day.



















    Tucker said the goals of the study are to provide the first definitive picture of North Dakota mountain lion population in terms of health, disease prevalence, reproduction rates and survival rates based on age structure.
    Tucker said when the first hunting season was implemented nearly a decade ago, there was little information — either anecdotal or biological — on mountain lions in North Dakota.
    She said having a hunting season is an effective way to gather data. "An animal in hand will tell us a lot about the population."
    Wilckens said when an animal is captured, he gets some help from Game and Fish biologists and in about 45 minutes the animal's vital measurements are recorded, a blood sample drawn and a tooth extracted to determine the age.
    He said the collars have a battery life of about two years and emit GPS (global positioning satellite) coordinates every three hours.
    Once a day, the collar will upload data to a satellite that relays the information to the manufacturer that in turns, emails the information to Wilckens.
    • Before the battery gives out completely Wilckens said it has a feature that allows the collar to drop off the animal, but can still be recovered using a lower power VHS signal and hand-held antenna.
      The collar will give off a warning signal prior to failing and it's hoped the animal can be located and recaptured and fitted with a new collar.
      He said he won't start crunching the data until he returns to SDSU to work on his thesis, which will be completed in June of 2014.
      The data points, or way points transmitted by the collars, will help Wilckens hone in on behaviors like daily movement, range and feeding habits.
      In particular, he said multiple locations in one area may signal the mountain lion is feeding or bedding down.
      It's been an even split between males and females and all of the cats that have been captured are in pretty good condition physically.
      "It's fairly representative as a whole of the demographic that's out there," Wilckens said.



















    • Tucker said information collected will help the Game and Fish Department manage mountain lion seasons in the future by getting a firmer picture of issues like disease and mortality rates.
      Some of the diseases the cats are monitored for include rabies, plague and parvo virus and so far there have been no issues.
      Wilckens said during the first year and a half, he focused on capturing animals and is now looking at behaviors, habitat use, home range of the animals, daily movements and feeding habits and kill rates of prey.
      A full year's data has been collected on some of the animals' feeding habits, he said.





    • Mountain lions have a reputation of preying on large animals like deer and elk and while that is a part of their diet, Wilckens said they fairly versatile in what they will eat.
      He said they are known to also hunt smaller mammals like porcupines, beavers, raccoon and in one case, there is evidence a mountain lion killed a coyote.
      He said it's not clear, however, if they were competing for the same meal.
      Wilckens said some times mountain lions will cache their kills, covering them and coming back later to feed on them and other times they won't.
      Increased oil activity may or may not have an effect on the movement of mountain lions but Wilckens said there is no way to know because studies have not been done until now.

      • While some of the research is being done on public land, much of it also is being conducted on private land in the West.
        Wilckens said many landowners have been willing to allow the study to be done on their land knowing that mountain lions are now a part of the landscape and a part of everyday life.
        Others are less tolerant. There was a time when a mountain lion sighting made headlines all across the state.
        Tucker said that has changed somewhat as people have become more accustomed to knowing the cats are out there.
        "I do think attitudes have changed somewhat and people have adjusted," she said.
        Because of their secretive nature, Tucker said it will be difficult to put a firm number on how many mountain lions are in the state, but it is a species that historically never has been listed as extirpated, or wiped out, from North Dakota.
        Tucker said what is being learned is mountain lions face many of the same challenges as other wildlife in terms of maintaining a healthy population.
        Females do not reach reproductive maturity until they are 3 years old and have a fairly low reproductive rate, giving birth to two or three kittens every 18 months.
        In the wild, a mountain lion that lived until they reached 7 years of age would be considered old, meaning females might give birth to five kittens in their lives.
        "That's one of the things we're trying to find out," she said. "North Dakota is unique in our management of mountain lions compared to surrounding states," she said.
        Tucker said North Dakota's population is relatively small and contained in a relatively small area.
        The first season had a quota a five cats. Two hunting units have been established; one basically covering the Badlands area and the other covering the rest of the state.
        There is no quota in the eastern unit and only a handful of mountain lions have been killed since the season was implemented.
        The harvest quota in zone one (west)was increased to 10 in the 2010-11 season and 14 in the 2011-12 harvest season.
        Tucker said it's recognized that the small population of mountain lions in western North Dakota relies on habitat in the Badlands, Missouri River Breaks, and Killdeer Mountains regions — roughly 6 percent of total state's area.
        Between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2012, there were 97 reports of mountain lions with 39 (34 percent) verified by carcasses, photographs or other means. The distribution of verified mountain lion reports occurred predominantly in western North Dakota, particularly the northern Badlands region, according to the Game and Fish Department.
        "Generally speaking, we have a small, but healthy population, she said. And while some animals may have wandered into the state from Montana and South Dakota, she said DNA testing has shown the lions here truly are our own.
        "We have a distinct, unique genetic population in North Dakota," Tucker said.




Friday, May 24, 2013

How bout that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Michigan has put their Wolf killing plans on hold and going to allow a public vote on the issue in 2014..........Anticipating the wolf hunting law would be suspended, the Legislature this month passed a separate law authorizing the Natural Resources Commission to designate animals as hunting game, including wolves......The advocacy group, Keep Michigan Wolves Protected said Wednesday the group is considering a second referendum on the new law letting the NRC decide game species..............Wow, talk about Wolves being a "political football" in Michigan.............Madness reigns across our nation as it relates to Carnivore protection........As John Laundre said in yesterdays Post on Carnivores, the ultimate predator, Man, continues to seek to eliminate all other of natures meat eaters.............HUMAN HUMILITY HAS LEFT THE ROOM!

MICHIGAN WOLVES 

  • Chad Livengood
  • Detroit News Lansing Bureau




Lansing — Animal rights activists are considering putting two questions before voters in 2014 about whether wolf hunting should be legal after the Legislature effectively rendered their first referendum! meaningless.

A planned hunt of gray wolves in the Upper Peninsula has been put on hold — for now — after the law authorizing the harvest was suspended Wednesday pending a statewide vote next year.

The Board of State Canvassers decided Wednesday the group Keep Michigan Wolves Protected turned in more than the minimum 161,305 signatures required to get the issue on the ballot.


















The referendum on whether Michigan should allow wolf hunting will be placed before voters in the November 2014 general election, suspending the current statute, state elections director Chris Thomas said.

Anticipating the wolf hunting law would be suspended, the Legislature this month passed a separate law authorizing the Natural Resources Commission to designate animals as hunting game, including wolves.

The campaign director for Keep Michigan Wolves Protected said Wednesday the group is considering a second referendum on the new law letting the NRC decide game species. "It is one of the options that we're considering," said Jill Fritz, state director for the Humane Society of the United States.

A second referendum is possible because lawmakers removed a $1 million appropriation from the bill that would have made it referendum-proof, Fritz said.The new law, she said, "makes an end run around our referendum and silences the voices of so many voters who feel very strongly about protecting wolves from hunting and trapping."

The NRC last week authorized a limited hunt this fall of 43 of the estimated 658 gray wolves roaming the Upper Peninsula in three zones comprising an area around Ironwood in Gogebic County, portions of Baraga, Houghton and Ontonagon counties, and Luce and Mackinac counties.

But the fall hunt is off until the commission can approve a wolf hunt under the new law. The commission first has to get the proposal at its June meeting and then can vote on the matter in July, said Sarah Lapshan, spokeswoman for the Department of Natural Resources.

Hunt supporters say wolves have become a menacing nuisance for farmers whose livestock have been attacked by the predators. Some residents have reported seeing them in their backyards.
Even though the referendum has essentially been upended by the Legislature's new law, it cannot be called off, Thomas said.