skip to main | skip to sidebar
Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever

Learn about Grizzly Bears, Black Bears, Polar Bears, gray wolves/eastern wolves/red wolves,timber wolves, cougars/mountain lions/panthers/painters/pumas, bobcats, lynx, red and gray foxes, wolverines, martens, fishers, coyotes/eastern coyotes/coywolves with pictures, videos, photos, facts, info and news.

Visitor Counter

hitwebcounter web counter
Visitors Since Blog Created in March 2010

Click Below to:

Add Blog to Favorites

Coyotes-Wolves-Cougars.blogspot.com

Grizzly bears, black bears, wolves, coyotes, cougars/ mountain lions,bobcats, wolverines, lynx, foxes, fishers and martens are the suite of carnivores that originally inhabited North America after the Pleistocene extinctions. This site invites research, commentary, point/counterpoint on that suite of native animals (predator and prey) that inhabited The Americas circa 1500-at the initial point of European exploration and subsequent colonization. Landscape ecology, journal accounts of explorers and frontiersmen, genetic evaluations of museum animals, peer reviewed 20th and 21st century research on various aspects of our "Wild America" as well as subjective commentary from expert and layman alike. All of the above being revealed and discussed with the underlying goal of one day seeing our Continent rewilded.....Where big enough swaths of open space exist with connective corridors to other large forest, meadow, mountain, valley, prairie, desert and chaparral wildlands.....Thereby enabling all of our historic fauna, including man, to live in a sustainable and healthy environment. - Blogger Rick

Subscribe via email to get updates

Enter your email address:

Receive New Posting Alerts

(A Maximum of One Alert Per Day)

Monday, July 25, 2016

Gail Clark is one of our Blog readers and she sent me the outline of the SPORTSMENS ACT(which a Clinton Presidency will likely support) and various writings about how DONALD TRUMP AND HIS SON DON JR. view our Public Lands Policies------Have a look and you determine which will MAKE OUR WILD AMERICA GREAT AGAIN?...............You might be surprised at the conclusions that you reach




WHICH OF THE PLANS BELOW WILL SERVE OUR PUBLIC LANDS AND WILDLIFE BEST?


WHAT A CLINTON PRESIDENCY WILL LIEKLY SUPPORT----http://www.kaine.senate.gov/press-releases/kaine-co-sponsors-bipartisan-sportsmens-act


DONALD TRUMP SENIOR AND JR PERSPECTIVE ON THE ENVIRONMENT
http://www.eenews.net/stories/1060037104
 
Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 10:05 PM 0 comments

Sunday, July 24, 2016

Southern California's PROJECT COYOTE Representative, Randy Felich, clued me in on prolific western natural history author Dan Flores' eloquent Op Ed in Sunday's L.A. Times about how California's Coyote co-existence policy should be one that the rest of the USA adopts..........Read all of what Dan has to say by clicking on the link below-----He sums all-things Coyote in SoCal as follows: "Los Angeles, with its now-estimated 5,000 urban coyotes, has switched from trying to move coyotes out of the city to advising city-dwellers on how to coexist with them — including scaring them off, installing outdoor lights, eliminating food sources, and keeping pets on leashes"..................... "Frankly, these are steps we have no choice but to take; the coyotes are not going away"........................ "They have been living among humans for 15,000 years"................ "They are very good at it, and in places like Los Angeles they are getting smarter with every generation about surviving freeways and human weirdness"................... "The next task for the Golden State, our national mentor in human/coyote coexistence, is to learn to become nonchalant about coyotes’ presence in our midst, maybe even enjoy it".................. "As native animals of the continent long before us, the coyotes, for their part, seem to have no difficulties with this arrangement at all"


https://www.google.com/amp/www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-flores-california-coyote-lessons-20160721-snap-story,amp.html?client=safari#
Op-Ed 

Coyote coexistence

 is a lifestyle

 California should

 export      --Dan flores 7/24/16

 'C-145' the coyote, in Silverlake in 2015


'C-145,' a male coyote with a home
 range mostly in the Los Angeles
 Silverlake 
neighborhood, is photographed on
 July 16, 2015. (National Park Service)

Can coyotes and humans get along?


Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 11:08 PM 0 comments

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Sometimes it feels that we are back 100 years ago during the height of the Federal Government's(Agriculture Dept. Wildlife Services) Wolf/Puma/Coyote/Bobcat extermination program--When you hear a North Carolina nimrod(watch video below) state that the Red Wolf has "a huge advantage" on us humans and will "overrun us" if we allow the Red Wolf rewilding program to continue, it just "turns the stomach"---Are we no further advanced in understanding that all wildlife, both predator and prey, have a role in optimizing the health and beauty of our great Country? USFW Service Poobah's,,,,,,,,,,,Do the right thing,,,,,,,,,,,,Do not let "the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many" as it relates to following through on the endangered Species Directive that demands that we bring back the Red Wolf as a fully functioning member of our Eastern woodlands

ttp://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/150318-red-wolves-north-carolina-conservation-reintroduction-science/?t=21

click on link above to watch two minute video on the Red Wolf

For World's Only Wild Red Wolves, a Fateful Decision
The controversial wolves have been reintroduced to North Carolina for 28 years, but now the state wants them removed.
By Brian Clark Howard, 
National Geographic
 

























































Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 5:29 PM 2 comments

Friday, July 22, 2016

A "FIST BUMP" and a "TIP OF THE HAT" goes out to the Chicago City Council who this past Wednesday passed an Ordinance that makes clear "that the Chicago Animal Control department should leave Coyotes to their own devices unless they appear aggressive or otherwise dangerous"..........Our Friend Stan Gehrt of the long running Chicago Urban Coyote Study testified in front of the Council (with the backing of Alderman Brian Hopkins) depicting how Coyotes serve the city well as an effective control agent of rats, mice and geese--and are of little threat to people...........Way to go guys!!!!!!

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwirrbvw1ojOAhXISCYKHddQAU4QqQIIJTAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dnainfo.com%2Fchicago%2F20160720%2Fdowntown%2Fcoyotes-get-protection-from-city-council-leave-that-animal-alone&usg=AFQjCNFi0pFW8sax3IMMHAub74hUBW5ARQ&sig2=GqqeMveANpAVON8wS2qcyg


Coyotes Get Protection From City Council: 'Leave That Animal Alone'

By Ted Cox | July 20, 2016 11:49a

CITY HALL — Coyotes can breathe a little easier in Chicago — if they get wind of the City Council's actions on Wednesday.

Chicago Coyote with Goose egg



Aldermen signed off on a proposal to make the "default" position of the Department of Animal Care and Control to "leave that animal alone," in the words of lead sponsor Ald. Brian Hopkins (2nd).
Hopkins advocated a "coyote management program" that would have had Animal Control steer clear of coyotes. Hopkins cited evidence that coyotes were rarely aggressive, while serving as a predator for rats and geese.

Chicago Coyote in one of the City's Green Belts



The final version passed Wednesday by the Council didn't impose any rules on Animal Control, but made clear the department should leave them to their own devices unless they appear aggressive or otherwise dangerous.
Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 8:59 PM 0 comments

Thursday, July 21, 2016

"In its natural state, before it was channeled and lined with concrete, the 51-mile-long Los Angeles River was often little more than a trickle for nine months of the year"................ "During the rainy season(October through April in normal weather years), the small, braided stream would turn into a powerful, churning river"............... "It behaved like a dropped fire hose, wildly lashing the Los Angeles valley, scouring gravel and soil across a seven-mile-wide floodplain, and carving a new course with every deluge"............. "When the waters receded, a mosaic of fertile marshes, ponds, and other wetlands remained"............."Since the catastrophic flooding event of 1938, the L.A. River has become a concrete drainage pipeline"............."It is no longer connected to groundwater and can't be until toxic waste from a number of U.S. Defense Department facilities in the region"............With plans to restore portions of the river to something that conveys more "naturalness", folks in SoCal will hopefully start to think about the river differently and not as a drainage ditch--"a teachable moment" as well as an escape from the intense urbanization that defines so much of human dominated L.A.




CLICK HERE TO GO TO LINK:
 revitalize and re-green the 51-mile Los Angeles River. 

19 JUL 2016: REPORT

How to Restore an Urban River?
Los Angeles Looks to Find Out

Officials are moving ahead with a major revitalization of the Los Angeles River – removing miles of concrete along its banks and re-greening areas now covered with pavement. But the project raises an intriguing question: Just how much of an urban river can be returned to nature?

by jim robbins

In its natural state, before it was channeled and lined with concrete, the 51-mile-long Los Angeles River was often little more than a trickle for nine months of the year. During the rainy season, however, the small, braided stream would turn into a powerful, churning river. It behaved like a dropped firehose, wildly lashing the Los Angeles valley, scouring gravel and soil across a seven-mile-wide floodplain, and carving a new course with every deluge. When the waters receded, a mosaic of fertile marshes, ponds, and other wetlands remained. 

Jim Robbins/Yale E360
Nature Conservancy biologist Sophie Parker in the the Glendale Narrows section of the Los Angeles River.
"It was a big, flashy, dynamic river system," says Sophie Parker, a biologist with the Nature Conservancy. 

But such flash flooding wouldn't do for a booming city, so in 1938, after a devastating torrent, a project to tame the Los Angeles River with a concrete straitjacket got underway. Since then, nearly the entire river has been funneled through a hard channel that allows no flooding. The city turned its back on the ditch, and public access to it was prohibited. 

Over the past several decades, conservation organizations and neighborhood groups in the United States’ second-largest city have worked to recreate some semblance of nature along the waterway. Collaborating with city officials, these organizations have restored some small creeks and planted native trees and shrubs in new parks. But the work has been done piecemeal. 

Now, however, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, partnering with the City of Los Angeles and conservation groups, is poised to launch the largest coordinated restoration effort of the Los Angeles River to date. The Corps recently completed a plan to remove three miles of river-killing concrete and enhance an 11-mile run through the Elysian Valley, a stretch called the Glendale Narrows. The Corps has asked Congress for $380 million to carry out the restoration effort, which will be combined with roughly $1 billion from the city. 

Congressional funding is expected to be approved soon, helping launch a project that could take two decades or more to complete. But fundamental questions about bringing the L.A. River back to life remain: What, exactly, should this resurrected river be? And just what kind of natural bang will Angelenos and other Americans get for their billion-plus dollars? 

This will not be the original L.A. River — trying to restore some semblance of naturalness to such a waterway faces major limitations. The river is no longer connected to groundwater and can't be until toxic waste from a number of U.S. Defense Department facilities in the region — including the Santa Susana Field Station, a former rocket engine test center — are cleaned up. And the many places a living Los Angeles River would go, flooding and changing course, are now filled with roads, houses, and commercial buildings. 

"We're not going to be able to buy up or relocate people," says Jill Sourial, the Nature Conservancy’s urban conservation director in Los Angeles. 

With full restoration out of the picture, a different tangle of philosophical and practical questions remain. How far do you go to create a natural environment in a city? 
It's a new ecosystem type. That's why we don't call it restoration. We call it habitat enhancement.'
Is it enough just to make a concrete drainage ditch prettier? How much of the project should focus on removing concrete and creating some semblance of a functioning riverine ecosystem? And in a city with an estimated 47,000 homeless people (including many who live on islands in the L.A. River), gang problems, and a range of environmental threats — from wildfires to toxic waste sites — is the expense of $100 million per river-mile a wise use of taxpayer dollars? 

Los Angeles is far from the only place addressing these kinds of issues. Many urban areas in the U.S. and around the world have realized that returning at least some nature to cities is vital, whether for green infrastructure that handles storm runoff, making cities cooler with trees and green space as the climate warms, or simply because more and more people live in urban areas and increasingly want more nature in their lives. 

Seoul, the South Korean capital, answered the call of nature in 2005 by finishing the removal of a major highway from atop a three-mile stream called the Cheonggyecheon, which flows through the heart of the city. Europe’s Isar River — which flows from the Austrian Alps and through Munich, Germany, and has many similarities to the L. A. River — has had some five miles of similarly channeled river “naturalized”; the Isar now is a major attraction in Munich and is one of the leading models for Southern California’s restoration efforts. 

In the U.S., the three rivers that flow through Milwaukee and into Lake Michigan — the Milwaukee, Menomonee, and Kinnickinnic — are being revitalized. And sliver by green sliver, pieces of New York City’s Bronx River — once one of the most blighted waterways in the country — are coming back. 

But restoring a river that is dynamic and free-flowing remains a far-off, even impossible, dream for many urban areas. Rivers often flood, and while that may be hard on people and the things they build, it's great for biodiversity. During a flood, mineralized nutrients and organic material are suspended in the river and groundwater, nourishing an array of biodiversity. And flooding continually creates a patchwork of diverse habitats, also promoting species diversity. 

Questions about what the Los Angeles River could become may find answers in the Glendale Narrows, where some elements of naturalness will be reintroduced. 

"It's a new ecosystem type," says Parker. "That's why we don't call it restoration. We call it habitat enhancement." The Corps plan would recreate 719 acres of wetlands, remove three miles of concrete to create new riparian habitat, and re-establish a confluence with a stream called Verdugo Wash. 

Slide bar from left to right to view the proposed restoration of wetlands at the junction of the L.A. River and the Verdugo Wash waterway. (Photos courtesy of The City of Los Angeles.) View more examples of L.A. River restoration projects. 

On a recent walk along the "river" in the Glendale Narrows, it became clear how oddly unnatural it really is. Unlike the original L.A. River, today’s river now has substantial year-round flow, thanks to a water treatment plant that recycles sewage outflow from 800,000 homes in the San Fernando Valley and releases 23 million gallons a day into the channel. Torrents in the rainy season wash tainted urban runoff into the stream. 

This 11-mile stretch is one of the only places that defied the Army Corps' Depression-era efforts at control. The bottom of the river was so soft that the concrete would not stick. As a result, this section of river is a purling, cobble- and rock-studded waterway with swimming mallards, blue herons, and cormorants atop boulders drying their outstretched wings. Both banks, though, form a massive concrete trough. 

Still, nature finds a way. It turns out that water sheeting over the concrete grows algae that are an important foraging habitat for shorebirds. Indeed, on the day I visited, a black-necked stilt was working these hard bottom shallows. 

Within this 11-mile section is a 2.5-mile stretch where the Nature Conservancy, in collaboration with the Army Corps and the local community, will begin its work in the next couple of years. The Nature Conservancy has created a baseline of ecological conditions to measure the changes its work might bring, and the group is growing native plants needed for restoration in Griffiths Park. 

Historical ecology — the study of old photos, maps, and diary accounts — will provide a sense of what the river once looked like, including the wildlife and plant species present. This will help guide restoration. "It gives you a sense of options for the future," Parker says. 

One major element of the Nature Conservancy project is the restoration of bird habitat. At one time, the Los Angeles River was characterized by perennial and seasonal wetlands, seeps, springs, swamps, riparian forests, and mud and alkali flats. "The reason L.A. was founded where it was is because it was an ecologically rich area," Parker says. "There were grizzly bears, deer, mountain lions, and a lot of birds." 

More than 300 species of birds still visit what’s left of the river, flying between fragments of habitat.
Even a partially restored river will provide an escape from L.A.’s overwhelming urbanism.
Two endangered species, the Southwestern willow flycatcher and the least Bell's vireo, will benefit from the removal of a towering invasive plant from Asia known as giant reed (Arundo donax). It has taken over much of the riverbanks, and birds can't nest in it. The arundo will be replaced with native plants, including several species of willow, sedge, and wild rye. 

“This is one of the places where birds can make a comeback," says Parker. "You need a bundle of different habitats." 

As habitat improves, the Nature Conservancy may consider reintroducing native amphibian or fish species that have disappeared. But there are some ecological functions that a revitalized L.A. River simply won’t be able to accommodate. The steelhead that once spawned here, for example, won’t be swimming up from the ocean at the mouth of the river at Long Beach anytime soon. Though they are endangered and badly in need of reproduction, the temperature of the water is too warm, and there are too many barriers. 

Because of the river's densely developed flood plain, it will only be allowed out of its straitjacket in a few places to flood again. I walked by one of those sites — a 42-acre Union Pacific Railroad property called Taylor Yard. The city is negotiating to buy the land, and one day the river could resume a semblance of its natural rhythm there, according to Erin Jones, an Army Corps biologist. 

"They'll bring the site down to the same grade as the river," says Jones. "The river will be allowed to meander and create new habitat — marshland, riffles, and pools. It's one of the larger sites where we can actually do restoration to more natural habitats and natural hydrology." After serving as a rail yard for decades, the site will likely need hazardous waste cleanup first, Jones says. 

Parker says she would love to see more of the river’s concrete removed and banks covered with native vegetation. This would provide significantly more ecosystem function, such as wildlife habitat, natural water cleaning, carbon sequestration, and nutrient recycling. 

Other cities are doing more complete "living river" restoration. The city of Napa, California, for example, has a history of devastating floods. But in the Napa Valley — where some land sells for $300,000 an acre — some vineyards are pitching in as part of an effort to help return a 4.5-mile stretch of the floodplain to its natural condition. This includes restoring oxbows and marshes so that floodwaters can be absorbed naturally during spates, rather than flooding the city of Napa. 

The Glendale Narrows won't be the end of the L.A. River restoration. A group of government and non-profit groups are meeting to see how the lower 20 miles of river might be restored. 
ALSO FROM YALE e360

Views: Los Angeles Aims to
Revitalize a Concrete River

Views: Los Angeles Aims to Revitalize a Concrete River
Officials are moving ahead with a major revitalization of the Los Angeles River – removing miles of concrete along its banks and re-greening areas now covered with pavement. View a series of photos and renderings that show before-and-after views of what the city hopes will be a $1.3 billion restoration project. 
READ MORE
This is a heavily urbanized stretch, running largely through low-income Latino neighborhoods, with just 3 percent consisting of parks, farms, or other open space. Remarkably, though, some small patches of wetlands there remain intact. Any work on this stretch is at least a decade off. 

No matter how the Los Angeles River is restored, thinking about the river differently and embracing its presence — rather than dismissing it as a drainage ditch — is a teachable moment for Southern California. Even a partially restored river will provide an escape from Los Angeles’ overwhelming urbanism and will perform some important ecological functions. 

"There's something magical about coming to a place and seeing so many varieties of life," says Parker. "The river provides that." 

POSTED ON 19 JUL 2016 IN BIODIVERSITY BUSINESS & INNOVATION POLICY & POLITICS POLLUTION & HEALTH SUSTAINABILITY URBANIZATION WATER ASIA NORTH AMERICA 
Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 9:54 PM 0 comments

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Any Island is subject to gross die-off of natural systems when exotic and introduced species find their way into the system............"(In Hawaii), some 90 percent of the state’s original dry forest has been lost to agriculture, overgrazing by feral livestock and introduced game animals, and the incursion of invasive plants such as fountain grass"............"At the height of its biodiversity, before the arrival of the first Polynesians 1,000 to 1,200 years ago, Hawai‘i was home to well over 10,000 endemic plant and animal species, or species found nowhere else in the world"................"Today Hawai‘i is known as the “extinction capital of the world” for good reason"............. "Though the island chain makes up less than 0.2 percent of the U.S. land area, it accounts for about 75 percent of the country’s known plant and animal extinctions and about a third of all species that are listed by the federal government as threatened or endangered".........."Historical and archaeological records suggest that the Hawaiian Islands underwent two great waves of extinction".............. "The first followed arrival of the Polynesians, when both the settlers and the rats, dogs and pigs they introduced found Hawai‘i’s flightless birds easy prey"............ "The second, far more extensive wave followed in the 1800s when immigrants from Europe, Asia and the Americas landed—along with the rats, cats, goats, cattle, sheep, pigs, deer, disease-carrying mosquitoes and other nonnative species they purposefully or heedlessly brought along"

http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/National-Wildlife/Animals/Archives/2016/Hawaii.aspx

Hawai‘i at the Crossroads

Site of this year’s World Conservation Congress, the Hawaiian Islands present a microcosm of global environmental challenges

07-15-2016 // Jessica Snyder Sachs
 17  0 
Hawaii-Crossroads
An endangered Hawaiian monk seal swims off the west coast of O‘ahu. One of the rarest pinnipeds on Earth, the seals are outfitted with plastic tags on their rear flippers so researchers can identify and track each individual.

ON AN EARLY MORNING THICK WITH VOLCANIC HAZE, Hannah Kihalani Springer looks out the window of her home 2,000 feet above the North Kona coast of Hawai‘i and across the homestead where her family has lived for generations. On this “voggy” day, she sees a landscape dominated by the nonnative fountain grass that was introduced as an ornamental plant a century ago. Springer recalls how, during her childhood, this African bunchgrass exploded across the land surrounding her home, invading native scrub and dry forest.
On clear mornings, Springer still can see remnants of that forest on surrounding hillsides, where bordering lava fields have protected forest patches from fierce, grass-fueled wildfires. For the past five decades, her family has helped nurture these remnant woodlands, which provide habitat for some of Hawai‘i’s most iconic birds—species such as the ‘apapane and ‘amakihi, two of Hawai‘i’s surviving honeycreepers. Both birds need native forest for insect foraging and nesting. Sadly, some 90 percent of the state’s original dry forest has been lost to agriculture, overgrazing by feral livestock and introduced game animals, and the incursion of invasive plants such as fountain grass.
'Apapane hawaii honeycreeper
One of Hawai‘i’s surviving honeycreeper species, an ‘apapane flutters atop the native dryland plant māmane.

In the 1990s, Springer’s family joined other local people in an ambitious project to enlarge their region’s remaining forest through arduous hand weeding and replanting the native understory shrubs and vines needed to support endangered trees such as the kauila, a type of buckthorn, and the flowering uhiuhi, ‘aiea and koki‘o trees whose blossoms adorn traditional Hawaiian lei. Their work drew the attention of state and federal agencies and environmental education programs. In 1994, the Hawai‘i Forest Institute began formally managing this restoration effort, and today the Ka‘ūpūlehu Dryland Forest is one of the largest intact swaths of a once-widespread ecosystem found nowhere else on Earth.
“We are people of the land with lessons to share from our intimate relationship with our landscape,” says Springer, former president of the National Wildlife Federation affiliate Conservation Council for Hawai‘i. “Our mo‘olelo—our history—describes the conditions our ancestors have observed and responded to since time immemorial. How the landscape changes when a volcano erupts or a family introduces cattle has taught us the nimble response—how to always be preparing for the next change.”
Preparing for change is crucial in the state of Hawai‘i, whose capital, Honolulu, is hosting this year’s quadrennial World Conservation Congress. With the theme “Planet at the Crossroads,” the congress will convene thousands of conservation scientists, policymakers and indigenous practitioners during the first 10 days of September. “We truly are at the crossroads,” explains Inger Andersen, director general of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the meeting’s sponsor and host. “Never before in history will what we have done in one generation have such a lasting impact on the future of our planet,” she adds. “Lessons learned from island systems such as Hawai‘i are critical to this work because they bear the first impact of ecosystem shifts such as climate change.”

Unmatched Diversity—and Loss

For more than 70 million years, the extreme isolation of the Hawaiian Islands—the planet’s most remote archipelago—fostered the evolution of spectacular biological diversity. To get here, the ancestors of Hawai‘i’s native plants and animals either had to fly, swim, float or hitchhike in. Once arrived, these species evolved to fill a wide diversity of habitat niches largely free of competition, predation and trampling. The extraordinary results of that process include the Hawaiian koa tree, a thornless version of the prickly acacias found elsewhere; more than 50 kinds of Hawaiian honeycreeper, many of which evolved elaborately curved bills allowing them to feed on just one or a few flowering plant species; and more than a dozen bird species that, in the absence of mammalian predators, evolved to be flightless. At the height of its biodiversity, before the arrival of the first Polynesians 1,000 to 1,200 years ago, Hawai‘i was home to well over 10,000 endemic plant and animal species, or species found nowhere else in the world.

Paradise in Peril

Sadly, the intricate webs of life that evolve in such isolation are extremely vulnerable to disruption by human development, climate shifts and introduced predators as well as other destructive species. Today Hawai‘i is known as the “extinction capital of the world” for good reason. Though the island chain makes up less than 0.2 percent of the U.S. land area, it accounts for about 75 percent of the country’s known plant and animal extinctions and about a third of all species that are listed by the federal government as threatened or endangered.
Historical and archaeological records suggest that the Hawaiian Islands underwent two great waves of extinction. The first followed arrival of the Polynesians, when both the settlers and the rats, dogs and pigs they introduced found Hawai‘i’s flightless birds easy prey. The second, far more extensive wave followed in the 1800s when immigrants from Europe, Asia and the Americas landed—along with the rats, cats, goats, cattle, sheep, pigs, deer, disease-carrying mosquitoes and other nonnative species they purposefully or heedlessly brought along.
The loss of wildlife that followed has been stunning. The most spectacular, perhaps, has been the extinction of more than half of some 107 endemic bird species. Still hanging on, Hawai‘i’s only two existing native land mammals—the Hawaiian hoary bat and Hawaiian monk seal—are both listed as endangered.
“Hawai‘i genuinely epitomizes the environmental problems facing our planet,” says biologist Bruce Stein, NWF’s associate vice president for conservation science. “It has lost so much habitat, been so dramatically hit by invasive species and now faces the effects of climate change. It challenges us to answer how we’re going to respond to these three threats worldwide.”
Hawaiian Pineapple Plantation
A massive pineapple plantation dominates a landscape on the island of Maui. Starting in the mid-19th century, development of pineapple and sugar plantations destroyed some 250,000 acres of lowland Hawaiian habitat. 

Large-scale habitat loss began between the mid-19th and mid-20th centuries, when development of sugar and pineapple plantations destroyed about 250,000 acres of lowland habitat, including land that long had been managed sustainably by native Hawaiian farmers. These massive plantations wreaked further havoc by draining surrounding streams and watersheds. At the same time, cattle, sheep and goat ranching were razing large swaths of the islands’ cooler, upland forests.
Today the last of the major plantations are closing down, as are many ranches. Habitat loss continues, however, driven largely by invasive species. Outside of fenced refuges, introduced game animals and the feral descendants of livestock destroy what remains of Hawaiian forests, while invasive predators such as rats, mongooses and cats kill off native wildlife.
Thornless berry bushes, nonstinging nettles, spineless acacia and scentless mints are just a few of the defenseless plants lost to browsing by nonnative hoofed mammals. Likewise, introduced cattle, pigs and goats drove to extinction many species of endemic flowering lobeliads—and with them many of the endemic Hawaiian honeycreepers whose long, curved bills evolved to fit the plants’ elaborate blooms. After being decimated by human hunting, the Laysan rail—an easy-to-catch bird native to the northern Hawaiian atoll of Laysan—disappeared completely after its habitat was destroyed by rabbits introduced in the early 20th century.
nonnative rat and feral pig
In a shot set up to show what happens in the wild—but rarely caught on film—a nonnative rat (left) gobbles bird eggs in a Hawaiian forest. While rats and other invasive predators kill off native wildlife, introduced game animals and the feral descendants of livestock, including pigs (right), decimate forests and other habitat.

Forest on the Rebound

In a handful of places, state and federal agencies have painstakingly restored native landscapes decimated by nonnative species. On the Big Island of Hawai‘i, for example, Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge epitomizes “the kind of habitat restoration that is possible with the labor-intensive work of replanting as well as removing and fencing out invasive animals,” says retired refuge biologist Jack Jeffrey. When restoration began three decades ago, Hakalau Forest was overrun by pigs and cattle that had trampled and browsed its understory plants and killed native trees by girdling their bark.
The federal government established the refuge in 1985 to protect 11 Hawaiian bird species, mostly endangered, in one of the island’s last large remnants of upland, old-growth rain forest. During the next two decades, staff and volunteers expanded this forest by about 5,000 acres.
Some of the most extensive replantings include thousands of endangered lobeliads. Today these flowering shrubs help support one of the state’s largest populations of ‘i‘iwi, a crimson honeycreeper whose long, sickle-shaped bill perfectly matches the plants’ tubular blossoms. When an ‘i‘iwi reaches through a flower to get nectar, the bird picks up pollen on its forehead and transfers the pollen to the next blossom it visits. Meanwhile, another native bird, the ‘ōma‘o, has returned to Hakalau Forest to eat the shrubs’ berries, in the process distributing seeds so new plants can begin to germinate.
But the intensive work of fencing out invasive animals can leave even the best-managed refuge vulnerable to funding shortfalls—including those spawned by recent federal cutbacks throughout the refuge system. “When I retired in 2008, the refuge had 14,000 acres of forest pig-free or close to it,” says Jeffrey, who continues to volunteer at Hakalau Forest. “Maintaining that means 63 miles of fence must be inspected monthly because all it takes is one tree fall to allow a pregnant sow to get in.” Within a year, he adds, that sow’s offspring can produce close to 100 forest-damaging pigs.
Recently, Jeffrey came across a sign that refuge staff is having trouble keeping up with fence inspections: a several-hundred-acre area where many trees and shrubs from 25 years of forest regeneration had been lost to pigs gnawing the trees’ bark and rooting out their seedlings. It was a heartbreaking sight, but such losses have inspired a promising campaign for a private endowment to fund fence maintenance and control future incursions by pigs and cattle.
Akohekohe and 'I'iwi honeycreepers
Hawaiian honeycreepers, including the 'i'iwi (right) and endangered ‘ākohekohe (left) are among birds hit hardest by avian pox and malaria carried to the islands by nonnative mosquitoes. But in a good-news story, this 'i'iwi returned to one forest after biologists replanted the native lobeliad (above, right) the bird feeds on and pollinates. 

The Climate Connection 

Just as invasive species play an outsized role in Hawaiian habitat loss, they loom large among the threats posed by climate change. Chief among these threats is the warmth-fueled spread of introduced mosquitoes carrying nonnative—and deadly—plagues of bird pox and avian malaria. Hawaiian honeycreepers have been among the species hardest hit, particularly the ‘i‘iwi and the endangered ‘ākohekohe, ‘akeke‘e and ‘akikiki. Today these colorful birds are rarely found outside high-elevation forests where cooler temperatures have limited mosquito numbers and slowed the spread of avian malaria and pox.
But according to research published last October in the journal PLOS ONE, a warming climate is likely to shrink—by more than half—the size of these remaining havens by the end of this century. Some forest birds may lose 90 percent or more of their remaining habitat to changes brought about by global warming. “It doesn’t bode well for the Hawaiian birds now restricted to the highest elevations,” warns wildlife disease specialist Dennis LaPointe of the U.S. Geological Survey’s Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center. “In laboratory tests, avian malaria has a 90 percent mortality rate in the ‘i‘iwi.” The death rate is somewhat lower, but still above 60 percent, for other Hawaiian honeycreepers.
Research by LaPointe and his colleagues also suggests that, in some areas, more frequent droughts are increasing populations of disease-carrying mosquitoes. That may seem counterintuitive, but in these areas, the insects breed primarily in streamside pools and pitted rocks. Normally, frequent rains and high waters flush out wet spots before mosquito larvae have time to mature into adults. But with warmer and drier conditions, the pools can remain stagnant longer and the larvae mature faster, he says.
Despite such grim news, Hannah Kihalani Springer remains optimistic. At her home on the slopes of the volcano Hualālai, she squints as a hole opens in the cloud bank, providing a glimpse of restored forest on a distant hillside. “Just as generations of our family have been involved in this forest’s restoration, we know that generations after us will remain involved in its management,” she says. Perhaps it’s this kind of intimate and enduring commitment to the environment, she muses, that the Hawaiian people can offer a planet at the crossroads.

Hawaiian tree snail Achatinella

Exquisite—and Imperiled

A snail in the genusAchatinella grazes on a leaf on the island of O‘ahu. Of 99 species of Hawaiian tree snail known to science, only about 20 survive. These long-lived, slow-reproducing animals are now restricted to patches of high-elevation forest, where conservationists hope to save them by trapping and fencing out the rats, pigs, chameleons and nonnative predatory snails that devour the native mollusks. 
Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 10:05 PM 0 comments

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Colorado Wolf sightings and a shooting death in 2015 of a confirmed Gray Wolf north of the town of Kermling has Colorado wildlife Officials reminding residents that Wolves are currently protected under Federal law and that they cannot be killed............Ironic that in January of this year, Gov. Hickenlooper and his wildlife commission voted to outlaw introduction of Mexican Wolves into Colorado..........."In the territory that eventually became the state of Colorado, in 1876, estimates of about 5,000 wolves eliminated are often cited"............... "Colorado has been mostly without wolves for more than 70 years, with the last one on record killed in 1945"..............It is likely that both Gray and Mexican Wolves intersected in parts of Colorado even though Hickenlooper is currently "going to the legal wall" saying that Mexican Wolves historically never ranged into today's Colorado......Really??????????????......

https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=http://kdvr.com/2016/07/18/you-may-start-seeing-gray-wolves-in-colorado/&ct=ga&cd=CAEYACoUMTYyMzgwNjk2MTE3Njg1OTAzMTEyGmRhOTdjZjk0NzgwNDY5OWE6Y29tOmVuOlVT&usg=AFQjCNFGbHCMyhLj45blrj2rlNCtN4LNOw

Gray wolf population increasing in Colorado

POSTED 4:57 PM, JULY 18, 2016, BY ANICA PADILLA, 

DENVER – It’s becoming more likely that you might see gray wolves in Colorado and officials are reminding people that it is a crime to kill them.
The wolf population is growing in nearby states and they are known to travel long distances, according to Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials.






There has been an increase in reports of wolves in Colorado recently and several confirmed sightings over the past several years, officials said.
CPW issued a statement Monday reminding people that gray wolves are still protectedby the federal Endangered Species Act.
Killing a wolf or any endangered species can result in serious penalties, including criminal charges, a year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000, officials warned.
“Whether you are a trapper, or an elk hunter, deer hunter, coyote hunter or a landowner protecting livestock from predators, you must be sure of your target before you take any animal,” CPW Director Bob Broscheid said. “Identifying the target and the species you are hunting is critical and a major tenet of safe and ethical hunting.”
A hunter mistakenly killed what he thought was a coyote a few miles north of Kremling in April 2015.
“The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service chose to not charge the hunter after their investigation determined he was hunting legally, did not intentionally kill the wolf and immediately reported the incident to Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials,” officials said.
The public is urged to report any sighting of wolves in Colorado by filling out the onlineWolf Sighting Form.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjhm9PPo4HOAhUBeCYKHWjcByYQFghSMAk&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailycamera.com%2Frecreation%2Fci_29405513%2Fwolf-reintroduction-colorado-faces-new-obstacle&usg=AFQjCNHFTOaV5aEeDMNd0UEgCECDCwOrfA&sig2=K53TXRw7gzI8SckmOGDNww


Wolf reintroduction in Colorado faces new obstacle

By Kevin Fixler
Summit Daily
POSTED:   01/19/2016 06:00:03 PM MST | UPDATED:   6 MONTHS AGO

In this undated file photo provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a Mexican gray wolf leaves cover at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge,
In this undated file photo provided by the U.S. Fish
 and 
Wildlife Service, a Mexican gray wolf leaves cover 
at 
the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, Socorro
 County,
 N.M. Suspicion over federal plans to restore
 Mexican
 gray wolves has spread to Colorado and Utah,
 where 
ranchers and elected officials are fiercely resisting
 any 
attempt to import the predators. (Jim Clark / U.S.
 Fish 
and Wildlife Service)

Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 10:21 PM 0 comments

Monday, July 18, 2016

"A team of researchers from the U. of Washington has for the first time begun to quantify the economic and social impact of bringing back large carnivores"........... "Using cougars and their value in reducing deer-vehicle collisions as a case study, the researchers found that within 30 years of cougars recolonizing the Eastern U.S., large cats could thin deer populations and reduce vehicle collisions by 22 percent -- each year preventing five human fatalities, 680 injuries and avoiding costs of $50 million"



https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160714163350.htm
Bill Betty
Science News
from research organizations

Cougars could save lives by lowering vehicle collisions with deer

Date:
July 14, 2016


A cougar stands over it's prey
Credit: Brian Kertson/Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

You would never guess it from their soft eyes and timid demeanor, but the swift-footed deer is North America's most dangerous mammal to humans.
Each year deer cause 1.2 million vehicle collisions in the U.S., triggering more than 200 deaths, some 29,000 injuries and $1.66 billion in costs associated with vehicle damage, medical bills and road cleanup.

These staggering figures are in part because deer's natural predators -- large carnivores such as wolves and cougars -- have declined in population, leaving large ungulates like deer to reproduce mostly unchecked.

A team including University of Washington's Laura Prugh has for the first time begun to quantify the economic and social impact of bringing back large carnivores. Using cougars and their value in reducing deer-vehicle collisions as a case study, the researchers found that within 30 years of cougars recolonizing the Eastern U.S., large cats could thin deer populations and reduce vehicle collisions by 22 percent -- each year preventing five human fatalities, 680 injuries and avoiding costs of $50 million.





The study is published online this week in the journal Conservation Letters. The student-led project was initiated during a community ecology class Prugh taught in 2014 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Lead author Sophie Gilbert, now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Alberta, will start in the fall as an assistant professor at the University of Idaho.

"The important take-home is that there can be very tangible benefits to having large carnivores around -- economic and social benefits, not just ecological benefits," said Prugh, a UW assistant professor of quantitative wildlife sciences in the School of Environmental and Forest Sciences.








"Carnivores are so controversial and there's a lot of fear, anxiety and resistance when they are reintroduced or recolonize an area. We are hoping that showing people how their lives could really benefit in a tangible way from having large carnivores around could help people become more accepting of living with them."

Cougars, also called mountain lions, panthers and pumas, used to live throughout most of the U.S. and Canada. State-sponsored bounty hunts to protect livestock and humans from the cats led to their complete removal from the Midwest and eastern states by the early 20th century.

Breeding populations have since recolonized their former habitats in South Dakota, North Dakota and Nebraska, and individual males have made it to Connecticut and, most recently, Tennessee. It is likely just a matter of time before new breeding populations pop up farther east, Prugh said.







In the meantime, without as many predators, the deer population has grown across the U.S., particularly in the eastern states. While these ungulates provide ample hunting opportunities, an overabundance of deer has led to more collisions with vehicles as well as impacts on landscapes and vegetation from deer's herbivore diet.

"I think everyone on the East Coast has either hit a deer or knows somebody who's hit a deer, so it's a very real problem for people," Prugh said. "An overabundance of ungulates might be a hunter's paradise, but it comes with problems as well."






The researchers calculated the cougars' impact by comparing white-tailed deer population densities and the numbers of deer killed by vehicles with and without cougar predation.

Their models showed that cumulatively over 30 years, 155 human deaths and more than 21,000 injuries could be prevented by the presence of cougars in 19 eastern states. A single cougar would kill 259 deer over its average six-year lifespan, preventing eight collisions and saving nearly $40,000 in associated costs.

The researchers were conservative in their estimates of the benefits cougars could bring. They assumed that three out of four deer killed by cougars would have died from other causes without cougars present, thereby reducing the impact of cougars on deer mortality by 75 percent. They also limited the possible range for cougars to large forested areas, although cougars could probably live in rural and suburban areas as they do in western states. 

Finally, the researchers assumed cougars would prey on deer at the same rate in western and eastern states. In reality, cougars would likely hunt deer at a higher rate in eastern states, because out west they have more prey options such as elk.






"The modeling framework and assumptions we made stacked the cards against the cougars being able to reduce the deer population. We didn't have any expectations that cougar predation would be enough to drive the deer down, and yet it did," Prugh said.

"Cougars are deer specialists and they target adults. With a long-lived species like deer, removing adults in prime breeding age can really have an impact on population growth."

The researchers were able to compare their modeled results with an actual example in South Dakota, where a viable cougar population lives in the Black Hills. The data clearly showed that after cougars repopulated the region in the 1990s, deer-vehicle collision rates markedly dropped. This real-life test case was strong evidence of a trend that could happen elsewhere, Prugh said.

The authors acknowledge that re-establishing cougars across the U.S. has its costs. Attacks on humans, pets and livestock could become more common, though their estimates show that cougars would actually save five times the number of people they would kill by way of preventing deer-vehicle collisions. The researchers next hope to complete full cost-benefit analyses in smaller subsections of the country where cougars are present.


Story Source:
The above post is reprinted from materials provided by University of Washington. The original item was written by Michelle Ma. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Sophie L. Gilbert, Kelly J. Sivy, Casey B. Pozzanghera, Adam DuBour, Kelly Overduijn, Matthew M. Smith, Jiake Zhou, Joseph M. Little, Laura R. Prugh. Socioeconomic Benefits of Large Carnivore Recolonization Through Reduced Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions. Conservation Letters, 2016; DOI: 10.1111/conl.12280
Posted by Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever at 9:12 PM 0 comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

About Me

Coyotes, Wolves and Cougars forever
View my complete profile

Recent Comments

Red Fox fighting Badger

Email Rick Meril

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments

Bobcat in Vermont woodlands

Mother and daughter Puma playing in North Dakota

Find us on Facebook

Find us on Facebook

Christmas morning 2008-Coyote hunting mice

Blog Archive

  • March (5)
  • February (11)
  • January (3)
  • December (7)
  • November (10)
  • October (8)
  • September (4)
  • August (11)
  • July (12)
  • June (9)
  • May (12)
  • April (18)
  • March (23)
  • February (20)
  • January (18)
  • December (19)
  • November (21)
  • October (24)
  • September (22)
  • August (26)
  • July (19)
  • June (17)
  • May (22)
  • April (24)
  • March (27)
  • February (26)
  • January (26)
  • December (29)
  • November (18)
  • October (24)
  • September (19)
  • August (25)
  • July (25)
  • June (23)
  • May (29)
  • April (31)
  • March (28)
  • February (25)
  • January (33)
  • December (32)
  • November (32)
  • October (34)
  • September (30)
  • August (39)
  • July (29)
  • June (34)
  • May (39)
  • April (31)
  • March (34)
  • February (35)
  • January (45)
  • December (42)
  • November (32)
  • October (25)
  • September (33)
  • August (46)
  • July (34)
  • June (48)
  • May (43)
  • April (47)
  • March (43)
  • February (37)
  • January (37)
  • December (45)
  • November (42)
  • October (34)
  • September (36)
  • August (44)
  • July (36)
  • June (45)
  • May (43)
  • April (51)
  • March (48)
  • February (47)
  • January (64)
  • December (63)
  • November (57)
  • October (43)
  • September (45)
  • August (52)
  • July (52)
  • June (48)
  • May (55)
  • April (54)
  • March (77)
  • February (68)
  • January (51)
  • December (61)
  • November (49)
  • October (42)
  • September (62)
  • August (68)
  • July (69)
  • June (42)
  • May (72)
  • April (83)
  • March (77)
  • February (80)
  • January (78)
  • December (90)
  • November (91)
  • October (93)
  • September (94)
  • August (92)
  • July (85)
  • June (90)
  • May (91)
  • April (91)
  • March (93)
  • February (85)
  • January (94)
  • December (90)
  • November (80)
  • October (87)
  • September (96)
  • August (90)
  • July (62)
  • June (54)
  • May (62)
  • April (55)
  • March (27)
  • February (14)

Hiker in Glacier National Park encounters a Puma......The Puma walks "wide" of the hiker

Search This Blog

Lynx capturing a snowshoe hare

Likely Wolf sighting in Colorado

black Bear in the Smokey Mtns berry hunting in the trees

Blog Translation

favorite links

  • Wyoming Untrapped
  • The Natural History of the Urban Coyote
  • western wildlife
  • Wild Dog Foundation
  • Coyotes live in Maine
  • Santa Cruz Puma Project
  • http://www.coyotewatchcanada.com
  • Mexican Wolves.org
  • Greater Yellowstone Science Learning Center
  • Western Wolves
  • Lockwood Animal Rescue Center
  • Wolf and Wildlife Studies
  • Worth a Dam
  • The Wolverine Foundation
  • mountain lion foundation
  • Boulder-Whiteclouds Council
  • Wild Read
  • Big Wildlife
  • Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
  • Coyote Yipps
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Craighead research.org
  • Wild Earth Guardians
  • Biodiversity Conservation Alliance
  • Center for Native Ecosystems
  • izilwane.org online Magazine
  • Oregon Wild
  • Ralph Maughan's Wildlife Reports
  • North American Bear Center
  • Wolf and Cat
  • Conservation Northwest
  • Howling for Justice
  • Wilderness Watch
  • Wolf Watcher
  • Endangered Species Coalition
  • My Place By The Pond
  • The Wolverine Foundation
  • Wolf Ecosystem Research
  • canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
  • Earthroots
  • Predator Defense
  • Sightline Institute
  • Downeast Lakes Land Trust
  • Adirondack Council
  • jaguar Conservation Network
  • Bordercats
  • Large Carnivore Conservation Lab-Washington State U.
  • Bat conservation International
  • The human footprint
  • Craighead Beringia South
  • Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative
  • Canadian Boreal Initiative
  • Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative
  • Keeping Track
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Native Fish Society
  • Jaguar Habitat Campaign
  • Northern Woodlands Magazine
  • Canadian Wolf Coalition
  • Forest Service Employees
  • Trust for Public Land
  • Rainforest Action Network
  • The Wilderness Society
  • Greater Yellowstone Coalition
  • Keystone Conservation
  • American Wildlands
  • The Nature Conservancy
  • Algonquins to Adirondacks
  • Two Countries, One Forest
  • Vermont Land Trust
  • Center For Biological Diversity
  • Open Space Institute
  • Wildlands and Woodlands
  • Rewilding Institute
  • Cougar Network
  • Cougar rewilding foundation
  • Eastern Coyote Research
  • Project Coyote
  • Restore:The North Woods
  • The Wildlife News
  • N.E. Eco Recovery Society
  • WERC
  • Wildlands Network
  • Outdoor Liasons
  • People and Wolves

Click Below to Follow Us On Twitter

Click Below to Follow Us On Twitter

Northern Ontario, Canad Wolfpack caught on trailcamera

Add Coyotes-Wolves-Cougars Link To Your Igoogle Homepage

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

A New Jersey Eastern Coyote unable to take a fawn

Blogger Rick

Blogger Rick
Strategizing at the WB

Let Rick and other readers know you're a fan of this blog...Become a Follower!

Making a Pitch at the WB

Making a Pitch at the WB

Two Massachusetts Eastern Coyotes at their den site

Eastern Wolf in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada

Gray Foxes(unlike Red Foxes) can climb trees--an advantage when pursued by Coyotes

Aldo Leopold--3 quotes from his SAN COUNTY ALMANAC

"We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."















































Aldo Leopold

"A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise."











Aldo Leopold

''To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering."

























































Wildlife Rendezvous

Wildlife Rendezvous
Like so many conscientious hunters and anglers come to realize, good habitat with our full suite of predators and prey make for healthy and productive living............Teddy Roosevelt depicted at a "WILDLIFE RENDEZVOUS"

Recent Posts

 

Blog Disclaimer

This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer. In addition, my thoughts and opinions change from time to time…I consider this a necessary consequence of having an open mind. This blog is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot and manifestation of my various thoughts and opinions, and as such any thoughts and opinions expressed within out-of-date posts may not be the same, nor even similar, to those I may hold today. All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. Rick Meril and WWW.COYOTES-WOLVES-COUGARS.COM make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.



Additional disclaimer information can be viewed by clicking here.