Visitor Counter

hitwebcounter web counter
Visitors Since Blog Created in March 2010

Click Below to:

Add Blog to Favorites

Coyotes-Wolves-Cougars.blogspot.com

Grizzly bears, black bears, wolves, coyotes, cougars/ mountain lions,bobcats, wolverines, lynx, foxes, fishers and martens are the suite of carnivores that originally inhabited North America after the Pleistocene extinctions. This site invites research, commentary, point/counterpoint on that suite of native animals (predator and prey) that inhabited The Americas circa 1500-at the initial point of European exploration and subsequent colonization. Landscape ecology, journal accounts of explorers and frontiersmen, genetic evaluations of museum animals, peer reviewed 20th and 21st century research on various aspects of our "Wild America" as well as subjective commentary from expert and layman alike. All of the above being revealed and discussed with the underlying goal of one day seeing our Continent rewilded.....Where big enough swaths of open space exist with connective corridors to other large forest, meadow, mountain, valley, prairie, desert and chaparral wildlands.....Thereby enabling all of our historic fauna, including man, to live in a sustainable and healthy environment. - Blogger Rick

Subscribe via email to get updates

Enter your email address:

Receive New Posting Alerts

(A Maximum of One Alert Per Day)

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

WHEN BACK IN OUR EARLY 20'S, ALL OF US GUYS WHO READ THIS BLOG WOULD HAVE EMPATHIZED WITH THE MALE MOLE SALAMANDER---BOTH THE MOLE SALAMANDER AND EACH OF US, TIRELESS IN THE PURSUIT OF A SATURDAY NIGHT "DATE".................In fact, the male Mole Salamander will travel 6 to 9 miles to find a female companion to mate with.........Like an endurance athlete in splendid condition, these Salamanders are capable of walking up to 2+ hours without taking a break--that is equivalent to us humans "lightly jogging for 75 miles before wearing out"----So, the next time any of you single guys question whether to seek out a companion, use the Male "Mole" as your role model

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencedaily/plants_animals/ecology/~3/OgRDa30OdnQ/161220220050.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email

Salamanders brave miles of threatening terrain for the right sex partner

Mini treadmill helps scientists understand mysteries of amphibian mating



Most salamanders are homebodies when it comes to mating. But some of the beasts hit the road, traversing miles of rugged terrain unfit for an amphibian in pursuit of a partner from a far-away wetland.

 Mole Salamander












And when those adventurers leave home, they travel an
 average of six miles -- and as far as almost nine miles --
to new breeding sites, a new study has found.
That's a long haul on four squatty legs.
The scientists who unlocked this evolutionarily important
information got there by cross-referencing genetic details
 from salamanders in various Ohio wetlands with the distance
 the animals would walk on a treadmill before tiring out.

          

CLICK ON "STROLLING SALAMANDER"
 LINK TO SEE THE
VIDEO TAKEN BY THE OHIO STATE
SALAMANDER RESEARCH
TEAM
Strolling Salamander

Mole salamanders that travel to new
breeding sites traverse an average of
 about six miles of territory that is often
rugged and inhospitable, new research
 from The Ohio State University has found.
The researchers used mini treadmills to
 gauge the animals' endurance and
cross-referenced the data with genetic tests.

: 

The research, published online this month in the journal Functional Ecology, is the work of scientists at The Ohio State University who want to better understand how and where salamanders procreate and how that fits into work to preserve the animals, including land conservation efforts.
It is a mystery what prompts a salamander to cross rocks, fields, streams and roads to mate and, in the process, mix up the genetics of another salamander outpost far from home, said lead author Robert Denton.


Range Map of the Mole Salamander









"It has to be incredibly intimidating for these tiny salamanders. They could get eaten by a crow or a raccoon. They could dry out," said Denton, a presidential research fellow in Ohio State's Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology.
"This is the first study to connect physiological factors -- particularly how fast they get tired of walking -- with genetics showing animal movement in the field."
Understanding these connections is critical to predicting how environmental and other changes can harm species, Denton said. Dispersal -- leaving the birthplace for a new habitat -- is a key element of keeping a species genetically healthy, he said.


"THE PLEASURE IS WORTH IT"..."THERE'S NO SUBSTITUTE FOR CAMEL
QUALITY"--  apparently, the Male Salamander feels the same about pursuing
a mate each Spring
Advertiser: Camel
Ad agency: N W Ayer
Year: 1921
http://www.adslogans.co.uk/site/pages/gallery/id-walk-a-mile-for-a-camel.8372.php

Advertiser Hall of Fame winning print ad

















Animal travel for breeding is a complex area of research, he said. There are a lot of factors to consider, including how they decide to move, why only certain animals hit the road and how they actually complete the journey -- in a series of shorter trips or all at once, for instance.
And when it comes to salamanders, things get particularly tricky.
"They live these really mysterious lives -- we only see them out for a couple days in the spring. They spend most of their time just hiding," Denton said.
Furthermore, they have fragile skin that prevents insertion of any kind of tracking device.
To shed light on the mystery, the researchers looked at genetic diversity and endurance in two types of mole salamanders (part of the Ambystoma genus.) One type is all-female and reproduces by cloning and sometimes borrowing sperm that males leave behind on twigs and leaves. The other type mates in a more traditional manner.


Mole Salamander








The "sexual" salamanders walked on the treadmill an average of four times longer before reaching fatigue than their all-female counterparts. Denton and his colleagues measured fatigue as the point where the salamander didn't "right" itself within a few seconds when removed from the treadmill and placed on its back.
Prompting a salamander to walk on a miniature treadmill isn't much of a challenge, Denton said. A small pinch of the tail or poke in the behind, and they're off at a slow, steady pace. The treadmill -- borrowed from another research team -- is outfitted with plastic walls that ensure the animals don't take a spill off the side, as they tend to not walk a straight line.
"They're like endurance athletes. Some of them could walk for two-plus hours straight without tiring themselves," Denton said.
"That's like a person lightly jogging for 75 miles before wearing out."
Genetic information collected in the wetlands lined up with the treadmill tests. Sexual salamanders were found approximately twice as far from their birthplace as the all-female cloning animals. The DNA analysis included testing of tissue samples from all known breeding wetlands in a salamander-rich area of rural Ohio. The researchers collected samples from the tail tips of 445 salamanders.
Differences between the all-female and sexual salamanders could have multiple explanations, Denton said.
"Maybe the best explanation for why sexual salamanders travel so far is because they have to: On a large landscape with few places to breed, the animals that can cross that distance are the ones that survive and reproduce," he said.
"Perhaps the more interesting question is why the all-female salamanders don't go very far, and we think that has to do with the physiological costs of not having sex. Essentially, not mixing up your genomic material often enough likely causes some problems for genes that you need to make energy."
In a given wetland mating area, most of the DNA samples looked alike. But there were outliers.
"We looked for the ones that stood out like sore thumbs," Denton said.
About 4 percent of salamanders were out of sync genetically, and could be linked to other wetlands where they were born, Denton said. That information allowed him and his colleagues to map the distances some of the animals traveled to mate.
"It was surprising to us that they go really long distances -- four, five, six miles -- from home," Denton said.

Story Source:
Materials provided by Ohio State University. Original written by Misti Crane.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

😄😄

Monday, December 26, 2016

In addition to hoofed browsers like Deer, Moose, Elk, Bison and Caribou, Wolves will hunt Beavers...........Where both animals roam the landscape, Beaver can account for as much as 60% of Wolves Summer diets............And unlike in most cases with the hoofed browsers, it is possible for a single Wolf to subdue and kill Beavers---but know that a full out caloric output is needed for the Wolf to dine successfully........Caught on video is the millenia-old drama of Wolf versus Beaver

Click on: "WOLF VS BEAVER"
 LISTING 
AT THE VERY
 BOTTOM OF THIS POST TO
WATCH THE EPIC STRUGGLE 
OF PREDATOR AND PREY












CLICK BELOW LINK TO WATCH VIDEO
wolf vs beaver !

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE WOLF DIET
www.wolfcountry.net

Wolves predominately prey on hoofed animals
 including Deer,
 moose, Bison, Elk, and caribou. Because
 wolves usually hunt
 for large animals, (although wolves are 
opportunistic and will 
eat smaller prey) they work together to
 catch their prey. Wolves 
will eat a healthy, strong animal if they
 can catch it. (Wolves
 need an average of three to ten pounds
 of meat each day).
deerWolves
 will also
 eat grass
to
 purge their
digestive
system
 when they have eaten
 something that does not
 agree with them. Food sources may
 differ and change
 depending on the season and
geographical area, when
 large prey animals are scarce wolves
 will prey on mice,
 Rabbits and squirrels, these smaller
 prey do not provide
 a substantial part of the wolf's diet
 but supplement it
 when larger prey are scarce.
Beavers play an important roll 
as an alternative food
 source in the summer months,
 in some areas 60%
 of the wolf's diet is beaver.
One of the most odd part of the diet of
wolves is fish! Biologist Bod Bromley
 once observed a wolf in Canada's
Northwest Territories catch five fish
 in fifteen minutes in the Talston River.
Wolves will also scavenge, In one
study of moose carcasses in
Algonquin Park, of 30 moose only 4
were killed
 by wolves,
 the rest died of natural causes.
Wolves will also eat wild berries and
other fruit as a minor part of their diet.

bison
moose
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371
/journal.pone.0165537
read full article by clicking on link above

Where and How

 Wolves (Canis lupus) 

Kill Beavers (Castor canadensis)




Abstract


Beavers (Castor canadensis) can be a significant
 prey item for wolves (Canis lupus) in boreal
ecosystems due to their abundance and
vulnerability on land. How wolves hunt beavers in
 these systems is largely unknown, however,
because observing predation is challenging.
We inferred how wolves hunt beavers by
identifying kill sites using clusters of locations
from GPS-collared wolves in Voyageurs National
 Park, Minnesota. We identified 22 sites where
wolves from 4 different packs killed beavers.
We classified these kill sites into 8 categories
 based on the beaver-habitat type near which
each kill occurred. 
Seasonal variation existed in types of kill sites
 as 7 of 12 (58%) kills in the spring occurred at
 sites below dams and on shorelines, and 8 of
10 (80%) kills in the fall occurred near feeding
 trails and canals. From these kill sites we
deduced that the typical hunting strategy has
3 components: 1) waiting near areas of high
beaver use (e.g., feeding trails) until a beaver
comes near shore or ashore, 2) using vegetation,
 the dam, or other habitat features for concealment,
 and 3) immediately attacking the beaver, or
ambushing the beaver by cutting off access to water.
By identifying kill sites and inferring hunting behavior
 we have provided the most complete description
 available of how and where wolves hunt and kill
 beavers.
Examples of evidence found at beaver kill sites (A,B,C), and 
of wolf behavior when in active beaver habitats (D) in Voyageurs
 National Park 2015. A) Matted vegetation at kill sites provided 
important information about how wolves killed beavers. B) Co-author
 Homkes stands at Beaver Kill Site 13 <10 18="" a="" active="" an="" and="" based="" beaver="" bed="" bedded="" below="" c="" clusters="" consumed="" corner="" d="" dam.="" dam="" examining="" for="" found="" from="" gps-locations="" hr="" in="" it.="" kill="" kit="" left="" lodge="" lower="" m="" making="" next="" of="" on="" out="" point="" presumably="" pulled="" site="" small="" span="" spring.="" the="" this="" to="" trampled="" vegetation="" water="" when="" where="" without="" wolf="">
The 95% adaptive kernel home ranges of the 4 wolf packs
 studied in and around Voyageurs National Park (VNP), 
Minnesota, USA in 2015.




Sunday, December 25, 2016

This Christmas morning we hear once again from Ecologist Cristina Eisenberg...........Like many in her field, she is concerned about how the Trump Presidency will treat out natural world.........She sums up her Huffington Post editorial(below) by saying----- "Science provides our best hope for the future of life on Earth".............. "Indeed, since Aristotle’s time, leaders have seen science as the sharpest weapon any civilization can wield to improve their survival"................... "But today, only science based on rigorous, peer-reviewed research designed with full freedom of inquiry will work"............... "Linked to our constitutionally mandated freedom of speech, our freedom to do science is part of what truly makes America great"



The Role Of Science In The Trump Era

Only science based on rigorous, peer-reviewed research designed with full freedom of inquiry will work.

 12/20/2016


This week the Electoral College confirmed Donald 
Trump as our next president. The election of a
 demagogue profoundly threatens our nation’s
 ability to produce sound science. And it creates
 a particularly pressing problem because of the
 many things Trump’s election isn’t changing—
such as how nature works, and our human
 fundamental needs for survival.
Humans depend on nature for food, clean water,
 and clean air. We rely on the environment to help
 us regulate climate and disease, and to support
 nutrient cycles and crop pollination. Trump and
 his new cabinet will endanger all of these
 ecological functions, by suppressing the use 
of science to inform decision-making about them.
Since the 1920s, ecologists have been pointing
 out that nature is at risk due to unfettered human
 population growth, rapacious exploitation of 
natural resources, and related environmental 
pollution. In the 1960s, in response to air and
 water quality crises that caused human deaths
 and species extinctions, we used best science 
to create the Environmental Protection Agency
 and passed a formidable suite of environmental
 laws such as the National Environmental Policy
 Act (NEPA), the Clean Water and Clean Air
 Acts, and the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Within one decade we began to see the fruits
 of these laws and their bedrock science.
Species such as the bald eagle returned 
from extinction’s edge; air in cities became
 safer to breathe. Yet, because of our 
increasing demands on nature, these 
powerful laws have been unable to 
measurably slow climate change



Science is our most powerful tool to build
 on the legacy of these laws and craft public
 policy to slow and mitigate climate change.
 A warming global climate is leading to
 unprecedented human health and
environmental threats, such as extinction
over the next 100 years of up to 50 percent
 of species currently living on our planet.
The only way to fully address these threats
 is by allowing scientists to conduct research
 effectively and transparently.
Throughout his campaign, Trump sought
 support by appealing to popular desires
 and prejudices rather than by using rational
 argument. Trump’s agenda to “make
America great” includes slashing funding
 for science and universities, adopting a
 formal platform of climate-change denial,
intensifying natural resources exploitation,
 weakening environmental laws, and
reducing all kinds of diversity. Pundits
 point out that Trump’s atavistic
demagoguery in assembling his cabinet
 creates a strategic assault on science.
To that end, some of his nominees’
regressionary personal philosophies
 push the boundaries of legitimacy
and directly counter the missions of
the agencies they will be leading.
A tour of Trump’s challenges to science
 begins with his selection of Oklahoma
Attorney General Scott Pruitt as the head
of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 A party to at least 13 lawsuits attacking the
 Clean Air and Clean Water Acts who refers
 to himself on his website as the “leading
advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda,”
Pruitt is hardly supportive of natural resources
policy checks and balance.
Trump’s top nominee for Secretary of Energy, former 
Texas governor Rick Perry, lacks the academic background
 to enable him to understand the essential role of science 
in maintaining US nuclear security. In sharp contrast to his
 predecessors, who were PhD physicists, he holds a 
bachelor’s degree in Animal Science. Yet he will take 
the lead in deciding how we manage our nuclear arsenal.
 Additionally, the Trump Transition Team’s intrusive 
questioning of Department of Energy scientists and
 contractors creates an ominous environment where
 it’s unsafe for scientists to use the term “climate change.”
Secretary of State nominee Exxon chief executive Rex
W. Tillerson has a background in engineering and close
ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The billion-
dollar Russian energy contracts brokered by Tillerson
 engender a huge conflict of interest. He’s persistently
dismissed the severity of climate change, yet will be
 our top government official negotiating our
engagement in international climate-change policies,
 such as the Paris Agreement.
In a field populated by serious contenders like Sarah
 Palin, Trump’s selection of Representative Ryan
 Zinke (R-MT) as Secretary of the Interior offers
some hope in an otherwise bleak landscape. While
supporting US energy independence, Zinke
 acknowledges that climate change must be addressed.
 He brings to the presidential cabinet a centrist,
Roosevelt-inspired conservation philosophy.
A pragmatist who favors sustainable natural
resources extraction, he also supports Native
American water rights and keeping federal lands intact.
Why does science matter so much in the Trump
era? What is at stake? Put simply, according to
ecologist Paul Ehrlich, our survival as a species
 is on the line. He calls out escalating indicators
of global collapse such as climate disruption,
environmental toxicity, the extinction crisis,
soil destruction, famine, and pandemic outbreaks.
 Ignoring these signals is tantamount to driving
 civilization toward collapse. Supporting sound
 science will help us find solutions.
Science provides our best hope for the future of
 life on Earth. Indeed, since Aristotle’s time,
 leaders have seen science as the sharpest weapon
any civilization can wield to improve their
survival. But today, only science based on
 rigorous, peer-reviewed research designed
with full freedom of inquiry will work.
Linked to our constitutionally mandated
 freedom of speech, our freedom to do
science is part of what truly makes America great.
Even the most conservative global science
 organizations are so troubled by the many
 challenges Trump brings to scientific integrity
 that they’ve been speaking out. Some have
been urging the scientific community to be
more vocal and frank about scientific issues.
For example, recently more than 2,300 scientists
 (including 22 Nobel Peace Prize laureates)
 wrote and signed an open letter to
president-elect Trump.



Beyond the scientific community, non-scientists
 can do even more to help defend science. As
 members of a democratic society, we can ask
 Congress to maintain freedom of scientific
 inquiry and diversity in science. Specifically,
we can comment publicly on and vote to
support environmental laws. We can urge
the president to hire a national science
advisor as well as other scientists with
 appropriate credentials in ecology,
physics, and engineering to fill key
 posts in his administration.
We can become more directly involved
by actually participating in science. A
variety of organizations enable scientific
 public engagement (called citizen science)
 such as the Cornell Lab of Ornithology,
 the National Audubon Society, and
Earthwatch Institute.
Whether you are a scientist or a non-
scientist, all of these strategies are about
 defending science and putting it into action.
Now more than ever, science is our best
 hope for the future. And now more than
ever, science needs you.
* * *
Learn more about carnivore conservation
 by reading The Carnivore Way: 
Coexisting with and Conserving 
North America’s Predators, and The Wolf’s
 Tooth: Keystone Predators, Trophic Cascades,
 and Biodiversity by Dr. Cristina Eisenberg.
Learn more about large carnivore ecology
by joining Cristina afield on her Earthwatch
 research expedition, Restoring Fire, Wolves,
 and Bison to the Canadian Rockies.

Saturday, December 24, 2016

Fact or fiction?---"There is an old saying, variously directed at wolves, coyotes, and foxes, that they live by their feet".......... "The Revisionists suggest that the fox, at least, does so largely to the exclusion of an intelligent brain"...........But those Revisionists are wrong!........."We humans are a sight-dependent species; the fox is not"..................."Therefore when we see a straight-line Fox trail in the snow that seems to suggest that the Fox ignored obvious signs of prey(to the right or left of the trail), we erroneously conclude that the Fox was dumb in not pursuing a seemingly easy meal"....................."What we fail to take into account is that a Fox listens it way to a meal, not depending on eyesight to dine magnificently"........... "The meander of a Fox trail is an effort by him(her) to triangulate with its ears some sound beneath the surface, perhaps a squeak, or the muffled sound of tiny footfalls, or the sound of chewing as a vole gnaws the bark at the base of a hobblebush".........."Upon hearing it's prey, the Fox then goes into it's higharcing pounce so as to get both its big front feet together in the air coming down at the same time, covering as much as eight square inches, punching through the snow crust in the hope of pinning some part of the prey long enough to get its sharp muzzle into the snow to grasp the creature with its teeth" -----------Magnificent intelligence at play!

http://northernwoodlands.org/articles/article/what-does-the-fox-see

1664
What Does the Fox See?
Photo by Raymond Hennessy
A revisionist theory about the fox has been circulating for a while that challenges the animal’s legendary cunning, suggesting instead that the Reynard of fable doesn’t actually rely on wiliness to catch its prey but more often stumbles on its dinners by accident. This theory insists that the fox, far from being wise to the ways of the forest, simply puts in a lot of aimless miles until it accidentally cuts the path of some potential prey, which it then captures thanks to quick reflexes. There is an old saying, variously directed at wolves, coyotes, and foxes, that they live by their feet. The revisionists suggest that the fox, at least, does so largely to the exclusion of an intelligent brain.
I’m as susceptible as the next person to the intellectual charms of revisionism, and I had this theory in mind one winter a few years back when I came upon the trail of a red fox as I started up the Champney Brook trail on Mount Chocorua in northern New Hampshire. Since the animal and I were climbing the same mountain by the same route, I was able to examine its trail at length and learn what I could from the record of its behavior in the snow.
Back in those days, I was still testing the idea that an animal leaves behind a diary from which we might – with some practice – read intention or accident, success or tragedy, even wisdom perhaps. With enough careful observation, I suspected, Thoreau himself might have discovered the reason for the hiccup in the fox’s trail that he observed one winter morning across Walden Pond. For a fox does little for no reason, and one of the adjectives that well describes its winter behavior is “efficient.” Unless engaged in the pan-species foolishness of courting rituals, the fox’s movements are winnowed down to the necessary alone. So, in imitation of Thoreau, I aligned myself with the fox’s trail so that I might align myself with its wisdom, if wisdom it expressed.
It was early on the coldest morning yet of the young winter. The temperature was in the teens and had been below zero in the valley only a couple of hours earlier when the tracks had been laid down. They were so fresh that the crystals of snow around their rim were still sharp and could easily be disturbed with a puff of breath.
Here was a good-sized red fox, traditionally wise to the value of energy conservation, frittering away precious calories in the perfectly pointless act, even in practical human terms, of climbing a mountain. For two miles and a couple of thousand feet in elevation gain I followed the perfect line of prints, the placement of which was as measured as a sewing machine’s stitches. The impression of each hind foot landed entirely within the outline of each front foot on the same side, a process trackers call “direct registration.” Foxes and other wild hunters do this as an economy, the front foot prepacking the snow for the hind. Repeated thousands of times on a winter prowl, this small savings in energy can mean the difference between surviving or not.
What Does the Fox See? Image
Deer mouse tracks - with no sign of a fox in pursuit. Photo by Ken Strum / USFWS
There were coyotes in these woods, I knew, and a young coyote in December can have a step length and print-size that overlap that of the smaller fox. But a coyote is a big animal with small feet while a fox is a small animal with big feet. In the same conditions the fox’s prints will look delicate compared to the robust impressions of a coyote. The pad outlines, too, said red fox, for these canids have fur-covered feet at all seasons, a useful vestige of their boreal heritage. In dry, loose snow this results in a diffuse track compared to the distinct impression of a coyote’s naked pads.
For over an hour I followed the neat trail with its nearly perfect 14-inch step lengths and a straddle so narrow that the prints were arranged in a nearly straight line. I had certainly to grant the animal grace. The careless romping of a dog liberated from the monotony of the house leaves a coarse, haphazard trail. It can afford such carelessness since a can of Alpo and a hearth await it at the end of the day. All right, I had to give the fox dignity, even elegance perhaps, but intelligence?
As I hiked, I found the thin layer of fresh snow punctuated by the trapezoidal bounding patterns of white-footed mice that had crossed the trail back and forth from one hole to another.
Was it stupidity that I was witnessing, after the fact, that the fox didn’t investigate each one as he came upon it? Instead, its measured stride never varied, not even an “indirect registration” to one side to suggest a turn of the head in the direction of a potential meal. Perhaps the revisionists were right: this was either stupidity or blindness. The unvarying perfection of its trail might have been the hobgoblin of a little mind, indeed. I began making mental excuses for this most beautiful species of wild canid. Perhaps this particular animal had, in fact, poor eyesight. Or wits. There must be half-witted foxes. Foxes...half-witted...foxes.... My own phrases were repeating themselves like a chant; the monotonous effort of the climb was making my mind whirr unmeshed. But stupid wild animals with poor senses don’t survive, I insisted through the mental fog. And here clearly was an adult with, by its size and the sobriety in its trail, at least a year of success behind it.
Occasionally, the animal would leave the trail at an angle, usually to give a quick sniff to a pillow of windthrow that might hide a rodent or hare, but then it angled back out to the trail without so much as disturbing any of the fresh snow on the branches to discover if there was something under the pile. How does such an animal live? By luck? If so, in these temperatures it had better get lucky soon.
Finally, three-quarters of the way to the top of the shoulder of the mountain the tracks stopped dead. The animal’s trail then led off to the left for a few yards and ended in a patch of disturbed snow. Another yard ahead, angling back toward the trail, showed some blood and the gut sack of a small animal, neatly excised and left on the snow. I poked at it with my glove; the entrails had frozen solid in the morning cold. I had seen this sort of surgery before by foxes and had always marveled at how an animal without hands could manage it, like peeling a grape with your teeth and elbows. Canids can barely articulate their toes and so their digits would seem to be useless for any task more delicate than digging out rodents. This rigidity shows in the lovely symmetry of the fox’s track, with no mobile toes adjusting to the surface from step to step as with a cat or a weasel. But to my frustration, such symmetry conceals the workings of the heart, as beauty will. One track alone is remarkably cryptic; at least a whole pattern of them, if not a lengthy trail, is needed to imagine more accurately what it was experiencing. I felt fortunate, then, to have a couple of miles of continuous trail in good condition in which to read this animal’s mind.
I felt better about my fox now. Here, in the snow before me, was success at least, if not intelligence. But how had it been achieved and why here, after the animal had ignored so many possibilities lower on the mountain? I inspected the footprints to the kill site closely. After the fox had stopped on the hiking trail, it moved toward the prey with the tiny steps of a caution that testified to the urgency of its need. First it had moved a little to the left and then back and to the right. There was no mark of its brush, nor were the tracks elongated to show any part of the animal’s heel – it was not crouched to take advantage of the pillows and undulations of the snow between it and its quarry. Instead, the animal appeared to have been moving upright.
It was only at this point that insight struck; I had been viewing the fox’s behavior through human eyes. We are a sight-dependent species; the fox is not. It was not seeing its prey, but rather hearing it. The meander of the trail was an effort to triangulate with its ears some sound beneath the surface, perhaps a squeak, or the muffled sound of tiny footfalls, or the sound of chewing as a vole gnawed the bark at the base of a hobblebush. In my imagination, I could “see” the fox now: upright, ears perked forward to catch every sound. Slowly, it had moved forward, lifting and placing each foot deliberately and carefully ahead of the other by no more than a couple of inches. Finally, there was a short space clear of tracks. The fox, having gauged the location of the vole, leaped into the air, ears perked forward, in a pounce that to humans looks playful but that is deadly earnest to the fox. The higharcing pounce is an effort to get both its big front feet together in the air so that they may come down at the same time, covering as much as eight square inches, punching through any crust in the hope of pinning some part of the prey long enough to get its sharp muzzle into the snow to grasp the creature with its teeth.
What Does the Fox See? Image
The perfectly measured pace of a red fox. Photo by Bryant Olsen / Flickr - C.C.
I sat on a blowdown and opened my pack for a candy bar, pondering what was in front of me. Now it was clear why the fox had ignored the trails of mice. They could have been made at any time during the previous night, mice with their big eyes being nocturnal wanderers after birch seeds scattered over the snow. To hunt down every mouse trail would be a fool’s errand; it’s what I would have done, having lost my instinctive intelligence many generations ago and been forced to replace it in the puny span of one life with the intelligence that comes from books.
 I had long ago resigned myself to the fact that in a primitive state I would have become an hors d’oeuvre for the saber-toothed tiger very early on. I was not the end product of thousands of years of ruthless natural selection as was my red fox. Civilization had been invented to protect me from that. Reynard, on a remorseless energy budget, can afford no such human mistakes for which he will be indulged and forgiven. Unless the fox’s incredibly jazzed-up senses tell it through some lingering whiff or some errant sound, that one of those trails will lead with fair certainty to warm-blooded prey beneath the snow, then the fox will, in fact must, ignore it.
That was it, of course. I had phrased it without realizing: “instinctive intelligence.” The fox doesn’t think in the human sense of sequential reasoning. It is a creature of action. In some mysterious evolutionary way of trial and fatal error, the thinking had already been done for it, the wisdom accomplished and encapsulated in that seeming oxymoron. What was left for the fox was to act upon it.
Somewhat heartened by my rehabilitation of the fox, I finished the candy bar and, renewed by the energy of the sugar, prepared to move on up the mountain. And so did the fox, itself refreshed not by a Milky Way but by the transmuted energy of one of its nearer stars contained in the meager flesh of a vole. Within a hundred yards, the shivers that had set in while I had sat were calmed by the effort. There it was again, another flash from the mental front: that was why the fox was climbing out of the valley on the coldest morning of the year. It must descend into the pool of cold on the valley floor every evening for the abundant prey that live there. But then it warms itself, as I myself was doing, by the exertion of the climb back up to some high, sheltered spot with a sunny southern exposure.
As I half expected, when I reached the top of the shoulder of the mountain west of the main ridge, the fox’s trail led off from the hiking path toward the south side of that shoulder. Let humans continue on to the heat-robbing winds of the summit. Whatever their reasons may be, athletic or aesthetic, they are foolish compared with spending the day curled up with nose and feet under a bushy tail, absorbing the energy of the sun directly while digesting it indirectly.
I didn’t follow the fox over the shoulder to discover the animal itself, perhaps to inform it in a patronizing way that humans had deduced from textbooks of meteorology that the day would turn cloudy with a chance of snow rather than yielding the sunshine its instinct predicted. It would be cruel to disturb the animal in its doze and make it run for no other reason than the pleasure of seeing it when it had been so perfectly and necessarily careful about such energy expenditures. Or perhaps it was simply that I had set another goal, a mountain peak more explainable to the achievement-minded back in the lowlands than the pursuit of fox wisdom. It was a failing perhaps that I was unwilling to be put off from accomplishing that summit, even to follow farther and perhaps suffer more enlightenment at the paws of the fox.
What Does the Fox See? Image
 
This story was adapted from The Next Step: Interpreting Animal Tracks, Trails and Sign by David Brown.