Saturday, July 23, 2011

As a good friend of mine with impeccable wildlife credentials has told me............"State biologists are very hard to communicate candidly with because they hold back to cover their ass(and retain their job)"......." These State wildlife agency biologists are appointed by fish and game commissioners(chosen by the Govenor of the State who tends to appoint powerful hunting, ranching and farming business people who supported their run for Office) who dictate to professional wildlife biologists"..........."As a result, these biologists will never stand up for the wildlife resource like the federal biologists do".............. "As a Fed one can be a good listener to private citizens and political animals alike, but do what they feel is right and necessary without real risk to their careers, whereas state biologists are doing all they can to keep their jobs ( walking on eggshells)"........."State biologists are pawns in the game of wildlife management who march to the beat of the state drum which means kiss the ass of agriculture and sportsmen who buy the tags that provide their salaries".............. We need a whole different system to manage natural resources"............Most folks in Montana feel that Carolyn Sime of MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS did the best she could under challenging circumstances to approach wolf management with a fair hand............We wish her luck in her pursuit of a law degree and hope that she re-enters the Northern Rocky Wolf debate being a positive voice for the wolves, bears and cougars who still call "Big Sky" Country their home

›
Wolf management pioneer Sime leaving Montana FWP HELENA - Carolyn Sime, a pioneer in wolf management in Montana, is leaving her job with M...
Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Brooks Fahy at PREDATOR DEFENSE shared this letter with me that he recently received from Environmental biologist Rick Hopkins at San Jose, California based LIVE OAK ASSOCIATES regarding Brooks question about the National Rifle Association's assertion that Predator(Carnivore) control having to be a central component of State Wildlife Agencies management plans for Wolves, Cougars, Bears, Coyotes, Bobcats, etc, etc ..........Rick states: "All too often, wildlife managers mistakenly rely on single species management paradigms that seek to naively manage wildlife for statis; a goal that is never achievable, and in reality, is not desirable. While conservation is often given lip service by these same state game agencies,almost all management of large carnivores is focused on killing carnivores through sport take, or broad efforts of Wildlife Services or other vector control agencies. This is why over the last decade, conservation biologists, such as myself, have focused on using spatial models thatinform conservation at relevant spatial scales (tens of thousands of km2) as my colleagues and I have done for over 40,000 km2of the Southern California landscape for the cougar. Efforts that are focused on actual conservation of cougars and not simplistic models of moderating lethal take. Conservation strategies, I might add, that have as its explicit goals the preservation of cougars within a functioning ecosystem while reducing conflicts with humans".............."Many game managers and wildlife services expend considerable energy ignoring the best available science that clearly demonstrates efforts to manage predators by broad lethal efforts, fails. It is astounding that we have failed to heed the sound and evidence basedrecommendations of such revered scientists, as was part of the Cain Report and not shifted our focus away from costly and ineffective predator control programs to efforts that focus onremoving the offending predator. It is disappointing that we find ourselves unwilling to movefrom severely failed management schemes to more cost effective and ecologically relevant ones"..........Read the full letter below

›
click here to read entire letter (LIVE OAK ASSOCIATES  commenting on NRA'S position on Predator Control
Saturday, July 16, 2011

As we Posted the other day, New York State has petitioned the USFW to keep the Gray Wolf federally listed throughout its Eastern range where it is not yet recovered............They are fine with Great Lakes Gray Wolves being delisted because of their populations being robust and continuous through Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan............However, New York and New England have the potential for a Gray Wolf rewilding while not yet a reality..............USFW agrees with Biologists David Mech, Jon Way, Brent Patterson, Linda Rutledge and the full Trent U. team of geneticists and biologists in that the Eastern Wolf is its own species and not a subspecies of the Gray Wolf......The USFW wants to delist the gray wolf in NY and New England and potentially(but not guaranteeing)institute a rewilding plan for the Eastern wolf.............Controversy abounds as the 3 Great Lakes States seek to delist their Wolves which the USFW are saying are a varying population of both Gray and Eastern Wolves.........Will this mean that the delisting requires these States to have a management plan and minimum populations of both Gray and Red wolves?.............. ....From a conservation standpoint, Mech states: "It's nice to know what the origins are(Gray wolves and Eastern wolves) from the standpoint of curiosity, but from a conservation standpoint, it shouldn't make any difference"(as it relates to delisting and managing this "canis soup" swirl of wolf in our Great Lakes region

›
L. David Mech, senior research scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey's Northern Prairie Research Center in St. Paul, Minn., and founde...