Sunday, October 23, 2011

Brooks Fahy of PREDATOR DEFENSE sent me this informative article that quotes Duane Diefenbach(Professoor of Wildlife Ecology, Penn State) definitive conclusion that Coyotes are not sinking the Deer population in Pennsylvania:......." Fawn-predation rates were normal here(since 2002), and I don't have any evidence that anything has changed since then — no available data, such as changes in hunter-success rates in harvesting deer, suggest that coyote predation is increasing..... "If it is, then hunters should be harvesting fewer young deer, and we are not seeing that"........""Peoples' natural reaction to hearing and seeing coyotes, and knowing that they are everywhere in Pennsylvania, is to wonder how many fawns they kill, but I don't know what we would learn if we conducted another fawn-survival study, especially because of what we already know about deer-coyote ecology"........ "I am advising a graduate student right now who is evaluating the assumptions and methods that we use to track and monitor deer-population trends in this state"........ "His research is focused on the validity of the model we use to manage deer"...... "All of his work done so far — both in the field and with computer simulations — doesn't show any evidence of a decline in deer numbers because we are not recruiting fawns into the population."..............Blog readers, like in most of the USA, we need wolves and cougars back on the ground eating their share of deeer so as to help regenerate our woodlands and prairies back into a state of health!

›
Coyotes Not Decimating Deer Numbers According to Expert    By Chuck Gill and Jeff Mulhollem, Penn State University UNIVERSITY PARK – It...

Seamus McGraw has been writing a series of article for the NY Times evaluating the consequences of his selling the underground mineral rights to Natural Gas firms who are drilling in the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania, NY and South to Kentucky.....Sean discussed the disaster to the land that is about to take place: "It takes as many as 400 truck trips to complete a single well, and that's not even counting the fuel-guzzling equipment needed to alter the ancient land to carve out the three- to five-acre drill pad itself........ Once that's done, the diesel drill rigs arrive, towering diamond-tipped syringes that work round the clock, often for two weeks at a stretch, to bore down 7,500 feet or so into the Marcellus before making a 90-degree turn to bore another mile and a half laterally........ It's a dirty, noisy, energy-intensive process, and despite the industry's boast that natural gas burns 30 percent cleaner than oil, in the Marcellus the hunt for it is still fueled almost entirely by diesel.....It takes millions of gallons of water to break up the shale, and at least 30 percent remains underground forever........ The rest of it, along with the slightly radioactive, highly saline and heavy-metal-laden water that has existed alongside the shale for 400 million years, flows up to the surface over the lifetime of the well"........Sean then states: "Is it worth it"? ...........It's an obvious NO as far as I am concerened......RISK VERSUS REWARD ANALYSIS OVERWHELMINGLY SHOWS THE RISK AND THE DAMAGE JUST TOO TOO HIGH WITH PERMANENT ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR ALL LIVING THINGS

›
Drilling Down on the Family Farm PREV Piotr Redlinski for The New York Times Piotr Redlinski for The New York Times Piotr Redlinsk...