Ohio State's Jeremy Brukotter's article in THE WILDLIFE NEWS highlighted a critical question about Wolves East of the Upper Midest............ The original Great Lakes delisting ruling seemd to suggest that If the USFW did subsequently designate Wolves in the Eastern States to be a distinct species(C.lycaon) from The Gray Wolf(C.lupus),,,,,,,,,, that it would have been possible for a Federal Judge to then invalidate the entire delisting rule which would have potentially put Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin Wolves back on the Endangered Species list..........In Bruskotters's own words: "Because the proposed removal of wolves in the eastern United States relies upon "unsettled" science, it puts the whole Rule at risk from a legal perspective; that is, a judge may find no flaw in the FWS's removal of wolves in the Great Lakes, but might object to their removal from ESA protections in 29 eastern states–especially if new research contradicts the FWS's claims regarding wolves' taxonomic classification or their analysis of the historical range of the various wolf sub/species. In such a scenario, the judge may be forced to invalidate the entire rule–keeping wolves in the Great Lakes listed. From my perspective, the classification of wolves in the eastern US should be handled separately from the removal of wolves in the Great Lakes. These actions affect separate populations of potentially different species, and thus, their statuses should be judged and handled in separate rules in order not to jeopardize the rule that delists the wolf population in the Great Lakes",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Bruskotter can rest easy as a subsquent USFW update removes this concern as follows: "We are separating our determination on the delisting of the Western Great Lakes DPS from the determination on our proposal regarding all or portions of the 29 eastern States we considered to be outside the historical range of the gray wolf… A subsequent decision will be made for the rest of the eastern United States"

›
The Federal Status of Wolves in the Midwest and the East: Conflict on the Horizon? In May of this year, the US Fish and Wildlife Service pro...

So January 2012 is the target date for Federal delisting of Wolves in Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin...........I think many of us understand that a contiguous population of 4000 wolves is a magnificent accomplishment of the Endangered Species Act and if in fact the 3 States involved in the future management of these wolves were not seeking to reduce by 50% the current population, all would be cheered..........Unfortunately, like in Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Oregon and Washington, State Game Commisions are ruled by Livestock and Hunting Groups who make or break Govenorships/Mayorships/Senate and Congressional seats with their financial clout............So when they say cut the wolf population by as much as half, the biologists in these States say 'YES SIR",,,,,,,SHOULD WE KILL EVEN MORE SIR"?..........As so many truly independent observers and Wildlife experts have commented,,,,,,,"Management of Carnivores left in State hands is a travesty waiting to happen"............Until all voices and stakeholders take part in State Management plans, Wolves will get shot and trapped without regard for the ultimate health of our Forests and Meadows....................In other news on this delisting front, the Fish and Wildlife folks in D.C. have decided for now that Eastern wolves are in fact Gray wolves and not a distinct species............So in theory, C. lupus can be restored to New England, New York State, Pennsylvania and the Southern Appalachians and be under the auspices of the Endangered Species Act.............Unfortunately, the Feds do not have the will to do any further restorations, so a hollow protection status rather than a practical protection hangs over a wolfless East

›
GREAT LAKES WOLVES TO BE DELISTED cbs reports  After devoting four decades and tens of millions of dollars to saving the g...