Tuesday, September 24, 2013

The Michigan environmental Advocacy Group, KEEP WOLVES PROTECTED, is getting the word out to stop the killing of up to 43 Wolves in Michigan's Upper Peninsula starting November 15................. Michigan law already allows farmers, ranchers and pet owners to kill wolves threatening their animals................ In fact, the Dept. of Natural Resources sanctioned the killing of 89 wolves in Michigan over the past decade based on this paradigm.................There are only some 600 Wolves in this recovering population and therefore many biologiists feel that it is way to premature for any sport hunting season to take place..........Every piece of peer reviewed science(See Trent University paper on this subject by Linda Rutledge) regarding Wolf Pack culture reveals that there is no good reason to ever sport-hunt Wolves............Human hunting of Wolves results in social disruption of their Packs which precipitates a breakdown in the top down biological diversity stabilizing impacts that Wolves bestow on the full array of plants and animals in a given natural system...............The people of Michigan sought to have a referendum on the Wolf hunt which Legislators circumvented by doing an "end-around" and passing Senate Bill 288 (Public Act 21 of 2013) just weeks after the qualifying signatures were submitted............This allowed the Michigan Natural Resources Commission, in addition to the legislature, to add Wolves to the list of game species that could be hunted..................KEEP WOLVES PROTECTED has launched a 2nd petition referendum to restore peoples rights to vote on whether Wolves should be hunted and needs 225,000 signatures to get on a November 2014 ballot........................Support this effort and the people of Michigan might just overturn future Wolf hunting seasons going forward

›
                                                 KEEP MICHIGAN WOLVES PROTECTED FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                               ...
Saturday, September 21, 2013

Interesting that the San Francisco newspaper website(sfgate.com) Outdoor writer Tom Stienstra includes Puma, Black Bear and Coyote predation of Deer in California as one of the key reason for the deer herd population declining to 445,000 in 2013 versus 2 million "bambi's" in the 1960's.................As the Calfornia Dept. of Fish & Wildlife accurately explains,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"During the period around 1850-1920, California wildlands were subject to high disturbance from logging, mining, fire, and grazing"........ "These disturbances led to increased acreages of early successional vegetation (new, young plants) that deer thrive on. Deer populations increased to where overuse of range by deer became evident starting in the early 1930s"............ "Since that time, with increased fire suppression and declining disturbance from mining, etc., the vegetation has matured and is not capable of supporting the previous high numbers of deer"..........."These changes began to show in the 1930s, with deer populations not reaching their peak until the 1960s"................. "Dr. Tracy Storer, a noted ecologist from the University of California, had predicted such a change in a 1932 paper published in Ecology" .............."The changes have not been instantaneous, rather, have taken several decades to become evident"................................"California Dept. of Wildlife biologists biologists believe that long-term declines in habitat condition, starting in the 1930s and continuing today, are most responsible for the decline(and not due to Bears,Pumas and Coyotes which have grown up with deer for millenia--also Grizzlies and Wolves were part of the historical carnivore mix in the state and deer did just fine with them on the land as well)...... "Lack of habitat disturbance, especially from fire, has decreased habitat value for deer and other wildlife in much of the state's forested areas"............... "Deer and numerous other wildlife thrive on early successional (seral) vegetation that grows back in the first few years after fire"............ Without periodic fire, the habitat becomes old, or “decadent,” and is unable to support wildlife populations of the past"............. "Indirect consequences, such as increasing competition with livestock and overuse of ranges by deer themselves, are typical" as we humans continue to alter lthe landscape via our building and agricultural activities................Historical population patterns from 1800 suggest that if we people got off the land, about another 100,000 deer(from 450 to 550,000) would take up residence in the state

›
  CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFE     Long Term Trends in California's Deer Population The graph below is a general...