March 30, 2011
Dear Senators:
As scientists with expertise in biological systems, we are writing to urge you to vote against any
legislation that would undercut the use of best available science as the basis for adding or removingany particular species from the protection of the Endangered Species Act. Allowing Congress toremove or add protections for particular species would set a dangerous precedent, as the fate ofevery species on the endangered species list (or any candidate for that list) would then be subject topolitical interference.
Because of its strong scientific foundation, the Endangered Species Act is the most critical and
successful law for ensuring the protection of threatened and endangered wildlife in our country.
Objective scientific information and methods should be used in listing or delisting species,
subspecies, and distinct population segments as endangered or threatened. While non-scientific
factors may appropriately be considered at points later in the process, their use in listing decisions is
inconsistent with the biologically defensible principles of the Endangered Species Act.
We are aware that there are legislative attempts to remove individual species from the EndangeredSpecies Act. For example, congressional proposals to delist the gray wolf forgo scientificdetermination of whether the species, or populations of the species, have recovered and whether
Biological diversity provides food, fiber, medicines, clean water, and myriad other ecosystem
products and services on which we depend every day. To undermine the careful and thoughtful
scientific process that determines whether a species is endangered or recovered would jeopardize
not only the species in question and the continued success of the Endangered Species Act, but the
very foundation of the ecosystems that sustain us all.
We strongly urge you to oppose any legislation that circumvents the use of best available science inEndangered Species Act decision making.
Respectfully,
[Signers listed alphabetically by state]-NOTE BELOW IS ONLY ALABAMA AND ALASKA SCIENTISTS(IN THE NAME OF SAPCE CONSTRAINTS--bIOLOGISTS FROM ALL OVER THE USA SIGNED THIS DOCUMENT
Alabama
Michael Barbour, M.S.
Database Manager
Alabama Natural Heritage Program
Auburn University, AL
Luben Dimov, Ph.D.
Department of Natural Resources & Environmental
Sciences
Alabama A&M University
Huntsville, AL
Sarah Duncan
Doctoral Candidate
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL
William Gates, M.S.
Wildlife Biologist
Madison, AL
Susan Hunter
Master's Candidate
Auburn University
Auburn, AL
Robert Lawton, Ph.D.
Huntsville, AL
Nichole Mattheus
Master's Candidate
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL
Kenneth Ward, Ph.D.
Academic Program Coordinator
Department of Natural Resources & Environmental
Sciences
Alabama A&M University
Huntsville, AL
Alaska
William Armbruster, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
Institute of Arctic Biology
University of Alaska
Fairbanks, AK
Leslie Cornick, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Environmental Science
Alaska Pacific University
Wasilla, AK
Duane Howe, D.V.M.
Homer, AK
Christa Mulder, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Biology & Wildlife
University of Alaska, Fairbanks
Fairbanks, AK
Andrea Repetto
Master's Candidate
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Fairbanks, AK
Derek Sikes, Ph.D.
Curator of Insects
University of Alaska Museum
Fairbanks, AK
Stephen Stringham, Ph.D.
Director
Bear Viewing Association
Soldotna, AK
Stephen Stringham, Ph.D.
Director
WildWatch LLC
Soldotna, AK
Lynn Wilbur
Master's Candidate
Sitka, AK
Bruce Wright, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist
Conservation SciA Letter from 1,293 Scientists with Expertise in Biological Systems to the United States Senate
Concerning Science and the Endangered Species Act
No comments:
Post a Comment