Saturday, January 21, 2012

Frequent blog contributor George Wuerthner(a good friend of ths publication) supplied us with this disheartening story on Montana ranchers blocking the State initiative, "BIGHORN SHEEP CONSERVATION STRATEGY,,,, by saying that the Dept of Fish& Wildlife has an obligation to consult with landowners abutting the planned release site, the Lewis & Clark Caverns area..........One of the statewide objectives in Montana's bighorn sheep strategy is to "establish five new viable and huntable populations over the course of the next 10 years and augment existing populations where appropriate." Relocations typically consist of 20 to 40 bighorns being released for two consecutive winters........ FWP has "struck out" with every attempt at sheep relocation during the past six years, and if that continues, Montanans will have to reconsider how to move forward...... Some large landowners fear bighorns interfere with ranching operations.......... Others worry that the public will disregard private property to view or hunt the sheep.........Bottom line that once again a narrow segment of the population(ranchers and hunters) determining the fate of wildlife populations.........THIS MUST CHANGE IF REWILDING IS TO TAKE PLACE AS GEORGE HAS SPOKEN ABOUT ELOQUENTLY IN HIS COLUMNS ON STATE GAME COMMISSIONS BEING CONSTANTLY "IN THE POCKETS" OF RANCHERS AND HUNTERS........ AND THOSE COMMISSIONS NOT SEEKING TO HEAR FROM ANY OTHER STATE RESIDENTS AS THEY MAKE THEIR LAND USE DECISIONS

Bighorn transplant called off; neighbors say state tried to ram plan past them




 This Aug. 9, 2007 file photo shows a flock of bighorn sheep grazing in a field west of Elmo, Mont.

 The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission has voted to reject a plan to reintroduce bighorn sheep to historic range in the Lewis and Clark Caverns State Park area in western Montana after neighboring landowners voiced opposition.
HELENA — A plan to relocate bighorn sheep to the Lewis and Clark Caverns area was shot down last week after landowners in the area said they weren't sufficiently notified of the proposal and opposed it.
It was the first attempt to transplant sheep under Montana's first-ever Bighorn Sheep Conservation Strategy, which was adopted in 2010. The discussion at Thursday's Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission meeting touched upon a key issue hotly debated during the strategy's creation: whether an adjacent landowner can have veto power over the move.

"This situation definitely calls to mind the extensive discussions we had when contemplating the bighorn sheep strategic plan over one word," said Commissioner Ron Moody, who on Friday explained that the word had to do whether FWP "should" or "will" consult neighboring landowners. The final adopted version says that before initiating a transplant, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks "will coordinate and cooperate with local landowners" before moving the wild sheep.

But Terry Murphy, a state senator from Cardwell who represents part of Lewis and Clark County and Jefferson County, also happens to own a large ranch near the caverns, and said he only found out about the proposed move at the last minute."I literally never heard of the proposal until Dec. 16 and found my land was listed as a passageway for sheep to move from one side of the highway to the other," Murphy told the FWP Commission at its meeting on Thursday. "The same kind of proposal came up 15 years ago. We opposed it and it wasn't done. We are there using the land and trying to make a living on it, not making it a tourist attraction. There is absolute opposition to it on my part."

FWP originally came to the commissioners in the spring of 2011 with a list of sites that possibly were good bighorn sheep habitat, and in November released a draft Environmental Assessment. The document looked at reintroducing the sheep on 139,373 acres in three adjacent areas in south-central Montana -- the Bull Mountains, Doherty Mountain and Lewis and Clark Caverns State Park.

One of the statewide objectives in Montana's bighorn sheep strategy is to "establish five new viable and huntable populations over the course of the next 10 years and augment existing populations where appropriate." Relocations typically consist of 20 to 40 bighorns being released for two consecutive winters.
In this case, the sheep possibly would either come from Flathead Lake's Wild Horse Island or the Upper Madison drainage, where populations have steadily increased. The EA noted that their presence in the area would have multiple benefits, including wildlife viewing and eventual hunting.

"Increased recreational opportunity, both consumptive and non-consumptive, would result in additional economic benefits to local merchants by hunters and wildlife watchers," the assessment said.
A meeting was held in the fall in Whitehall, and Kujala said there seemed to be tolerance for the sheep by areas residents.

Murphy didn't see it the same way. He said he never heard about the meeting, nor had some of hisneighbors, and they were angry to learn of the proposal."I'm here to plead with you," he said. "Please do not force this down our throats."

Based upon that opposition, Kujala recommended that the move not be made and the commission agreed.
"The (FWP) department is working hard to live up to this plan, which was the consensus of a lot of groups," said Commissioner Dan Vermillion. "But the department, in this case has — no question — there were some things they could have done better with public outreach. But I think the department did a good job making sure the plan was known to a broad swath of the community."

Vermillion added that FWP has "struck out" with every attempt at sheep relocation during the past six years, and if that continues, Montanans will have to reconsider how to move forward. Some large landowners fear bighorns interfere with ranching operations. Others worry that the public will disregard private property to view or hunt the sheep

"If the sheep plan doesn't allow us to translocate sheep, then that's a problem," Vermillion said. "We shouldn't find ourselves at the 12th hour stepping back from something we thought everyone supported."

No comments:

Post a Comment