Final Michigan Wolf Hunt Kill 23, Short Of Quota
January 2, 2014 7:57 AM
MARQUETTE (AP) - Twenty-three wolves were killed in the Upper Peninsula during Michigan’s first wolf hunt in four decades, the state reported Wednesday.
One kill was reported on the hunt’s final day Tuesday, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources said. The department had a quota of 43 for the hunt. Officials said that unusually cold weather probably kept the hunt in check.
DNR Wildlife biologist Brian Roell, in the Marquette office, said the hunt was a success, citing what he said was the state’s first use of a call-in system to keep track of animals killed. Decades ago, Michigan simply offered a bounty for wolves killed. When their numbers declined significantly, they were listed as a federally protected endangered species for four decades, ending in 2012.
The hunt took place in three Upper Peninsula zones where the animal has been deemed problematic, Roell told MLive.com. He said there could be several reasons for the few number of wolves killed, including that they are a new species being hunted, the cold temperatures and relatively small hunting zones.
Hunters also have told Roell that there were dramatic changes in how wolves behave after hunters entered the woods.
“It’s hard to make any declarative statement with one year’s worth of data,” Roell said.
Five of the maximum 16 wolves were killed in the far western U.P., 14 of 19 in four central counties and four of eight in the eastern U.P.
The wolf hunting season opened Nov. 15. Before the season, the DNR estimated that Michigan had 658 wolves.
Wolf hunt supporters say it addresses a problem of attacks on livestock and pets.
Opponents say the hunt was poorly planned and endangers the wolf’s recovery.
“This whole hunt is happening because of tall tales and fear mongering,” said Jill Fritz, Michigan director for The Humane Society of the United States and the director of Keep Michigan Wolves Protected. Pro- and anti-wolf hunt ballot petition drives are underway.
The DNR and the sate National Resources Commission will study the 2013 hunt in the first half of 2014 and decide if there should be a hunt this year.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARNIVORE IMPACT ON DEER IN MICHIGAN--CLICK LINK ABOVE
Michigan hunters have been known to say that
state’s growing
wolf population is bad for deer. Their lament is
about the
diminished Upper Peninsula whitetail population.
It’s not
unusual to hear someone claim: “Wolf are eating
all the deer.”
But what researchers found this past winter,
the third year
of a western U.P. deer mortality study, is
that coyotes were
the No. 1 predator followed by bobcats.
Wolves came in fourth
after a three-way tie among hunters,
unknown predators and
undetermined causes.
“I was somewhat surprised to see coyotes
play as large a role
in fawn predation as they did...,” said Jerry
Belant, an associate
professor of Wildlife Ecology and Management
at Mississippi
State University. Belant oversees student
researchers who
are working in partnership with the Michigan
Department of
Natural Resources. He said coyotes were more
prevalent than
expected. There were also few rabbits and
hares to feed upon.
Researchers got their data from 142 fawns
fitted with GPS
collars. The devices transmitted their location
every 15 minutes.
Eighty collared fawns died during the three
year first phase of
the study. Predators killed 73 percent of the deer.
The study aims to identify just what is killing
UP deer. Phase
1 took place in a region known for “low snow”
depths. Phase
2 and 3 will look at mid- and high-snow zones.
“We wanted to look at the role of predation and
winter habitat
on fawn survival,” said Dean Beyer, a wildlife
researcher with
Michigan’s DNR.
Agency staff have long said that wolves play
a small role in
deer mortality. Biologists estimate the UP
deer population
at 270,000. Cars and hunters kill roughly
64,000. Wolves
kill 17,000 to 29,000 deer. An estimated
687 gray wolves
live in the Upper Peninsula, according to
the DNR’s website.
“We jumped into the UP because of the
deer population
trends,” Beyer said. “The herd did well
in the early '90s.
Then we had two severe winters back
to back (in the mid 90s)
and the population dropped and stayed
flat and hasn’t rebounded.
“Winter weather is a driver up there.
Lake Superior is a snow
making machine. It creates deep snows
close to the lake and
the snow depths decline as you move away.”
Severe UP winters can kill 30 percent or
more of the deer
population. So researchers collared both
fawns and predators.
The GPS data was plotted on a map. When
a cluster appeared,
students went out to the site to see what
they could find.
Belant and Beyer discovered two packs of
wolves in the area.
But they also found something else: nine
livestock pits where
farmers dumped dead cattle.
“They (wolves) were hitting carcasses,”
Beyer said. “That
influenced the predation on fawns and
might have reduced it.
It will be interesting to see what happens
in the mid-snow zone
where there is no agriculture or cattle dump.”
Phase 2 begins next winter in Iron County,
Phase 1, in Delta
and Menominee counties, collected predator
data points for
650,000 locations, Beyer said.
“We’re pretty pleased with how things worked
out. The one
thing that surprised us a little was finding that
bobcats were
very efficient predators. Their kill rate was
higher than we
expected.”
Wolves, on the other hand, were expected
to score higher.
That they didn’t has researchers wondering
what will show
up next year.
Brent Rudolph, the DNR’s deer program
manager, said he
expects wolves will play a bigger role in
deer predation.
“We went into an area not as heavily
used by wolves,” he
said. “As we shift study sites into areas
with more wolves
there will be more wolf mortality. Coyotes
won’t be as
effective in those areas because wolves
will outright exclude
coyotes on the kill.”
It is fair to say that having wolves on the
landscape stirs
emotions for many. Wolves are feared,
reviled and revered;
the root of all that would take up another
column — maybe two.
So let me say I am glad to see this study
moving forward.
The first phase results are enlightening.
The rest will tell us
what we need to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment