The Chippewa Indian Tribes of Northern Wisconsin can play a critical role in limiting the first Wolf hunting season in Wisconsin, scheduled to begin Oct 15 and running thru the end of Feb 2013............The Tribes consider the Wolf an integral part of their creation story and have previously protested to the State that there should not have been a wolf hunting season instituted...........Right now, 201 Wolves are tartgeted by the Dept of Ntl Resources for removal from the population of about 800 animals, about 25% of the total state population.............While historically many wolf researchers claim that a wolf population can sustain up to 1/3 mortality annually and still not see the population diminish, some researchers feel that the destruction of the wolf social units though 25 or more % of the population can begin to sink the population...............I for one hope that the Chippewa Tribes exercise their right to claim 50% of the wolf huniting liceenses throughout the 6 wolf zones targeted for hunting and in the process signiicantly reduce the number of animals that will be killed............Also not addressed, is that Wolves begin to mate in early Winter and that this killing season squarely zeros in on early winter when females may be pregnant with pups............C'mon Wisconsin, you can do better than the draconian wolf management policies that you have seen implemented throughout the Rocky Mtn States!

Wis. DNR restricts fall wolf kill to 201 animals

By TODD RICHMOND
Associated Press
         
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Hunters would be allowed to kill nearly a quarter of Wisconsin's wolves this winter under rules the state Department of Natural Resources proposed Tuesday, sparking a debate over the hunt will make any dent in the state's burgeoning wolf population.
         
The rules package sets a statewide quota of 201 wolves across six zones. Non-tribal hunters could face even tighter kill limits. Wisconsin's Chippewa tribes have the right to claim up to 50 percent of the quota in the northern third of the state for themselves.
The DNR estimates between 815 and 880 wolves roam the state. Department wildlife officials want to scale the population back to 350 wolves but grumbling already has begun over whether the quota is too low to have any effect this year.           "They're being overly conservative in my judgment," said George Meyer, executive director of the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation and a former DNR secretary. "You may not even reduce the population for next year. I'm not disagreeing with the idea of being cautious. (But) this is getting to be ultra-cautious."
         
President Barack Obama's administration removed wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin from the endangered species list in January. Days later, GOP lawmakers in Wisconsin introduced a bill setting up a hunt. Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed it into law in April.
The legislation lays out most of the hunt's parameters — it will run from Oct. 15 to the end of February, permit applications will cost $10, permits will cost $100 for in-state hunters and hunters can use dogs, traps and bait — but left the kill quotas up to the DNR.

Department Secretary Cathy Stepp wrote in a memo to the Natural Resources Board the quotas will begin to reduce the wolf population, noting areas with depredation problems have been placed in zones with higher sub-quotas. However, the department is "uncomfortable" prescribing higher harvests because it's still unclear how depredation kills, illegal kills and the hunt's impact on wolf reproduction will affect the population.
         
"We're going to learn a lot from this year," DNR Lands Division Administrator Kurt Thiede said in an interview. "That's one of the reasons we're proceeding slowly. We're trying to find a balance between all the factors."
         
One of those factors is Wisconsin's six Chippewa tribes _ the Lac Du Flambeau, the Bad River, the Red Cliff, the St. Croix, the Lac Courte Oreilles and Mole Lake.           Under treaties signed in 1837 and 1842, the tribes ceded 22,400 square miles across the northern third of the state to the government. A federal ruling in 1991 found the tribes have the right to harvest 50 percent of the quota for any animal in that territory. At least a part of all six wolf zones falls within the ceded territory.
         
It's unclear to what extent the tribes would exercise that right and how many tribal members would participate in a wolf hunt. The wolf plays a crucial role in the tribes' creation stories and culture, embodying intelligence and wisdom. Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission Executive Administrator James Zorn wrote to the state Senate in February that a hunt would hurt the wolf population in the territory and the legislation was rushed.
         
DNR officials hope the tribes will make their claim by August, when permit applications will become available. If the tribes claim even a portion of their quota percentage, non-tribal hunters wouldn't be able to kill as many wolves.
         
Messages left at the commission Tuesday weren't immediately returned. Larry Wauronowicz, natural resources director for the Lac Du Flambeau, declined comment, saying he had just received a copy of the rules. Attempts to reach Bad River tribal chairman Mike Wiggins Jr. were unsuccessful. Red Cliff tribal chairwoman Rose Gurnoe Soulier didn't immediately return telephone and email messages.
State Assembly Majority Leader Scott Suder, R-Abbotsford, helped write the hunt legislation. He said he's not happy about the low quota or the possibility of the tribes reducing it even further for non-tribal hunters, but DNR officials have told him they want to avoid lawsuits from animal rights groups.
         
"Am I disappointed in the 201 kill quota number? Yes," Suder said. "We're going to push the DNR to raise the number in future seasons. Right now, we just want to get a successful first harvest season under our belt."           The Natural Resources Board, which sets DNR policy, is scheduled to vote on the rules at a meeting July 17 in Stevens Point.           Bill Bruins is a member of the board and president of the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation, which lobbied for the hunt legislation. He said he supports the rules.           "By all means we don't want to overharvest in the first year," he said. "We're trying to control the range of the wolf in Wisconsin. This isn't going to be a one-and-done proposition."