We must remember that National Parks are man created and while often seeming immense in acreage, are artificial boundaries as it relates to the movement of wildlife.........In Algonquin National Park in Eastern Canada, Wolves were allowed to be hunted and trapped outside Park boundaries until John and Mary Theberge proved to Officials that buffer zones around the Park were critical to keeping the Park Wolf population from free-falling into oblivion................Now, former Commissioner of the Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game, Frank Rue, speaks out forcefully about the need to provide buffer zones around Denali National Park in Alaska so that the Wolves there may persist and prosper.

Denali wolves: Trapping incompatible with Denali visitor experience

by Frank Rue;newminer.com

 

In a 4-3 vote in March 2010, the Board of Game removed its wolf trapping and hunting closure along the east and northeast boundaries of Denali National Park.

As commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, I supported the original decision by the Board of Game to close this area outside the park to the taking of wolves.

It was the right thing to do then, and the current Board should accept the public petition recently put before it to reverse its decision because it is the right thing to do now.

The wolves in the pack that frequents the eastern boundary of Denali National Park are the most-viewed wild wolves in Alaska and probably the most-viewed wild wolves on the planet. Unfortunately, they occasionally move across the park boundary and are vulnerable to trapping and hunting.

Denali National Park boundaries

Last winter, with trapping along the park boundary legal again, a trapper killed the only breeding female of the boundary pack, and the pack produced no pups. With its social structure destroyed, the pack dispersed and left the territory vacant. Eventually another pack will take over this territory, but in the meantime, there will be a significant loss in viewing opportunity for hundreds of thousands of people just so that one or two trappers have a slightly larger area to trap.

More than 400,000 people, including many Alaskans, visited Denali this year. The incredible scenery and the possibility of seeing wild wolves, sheep, moose and bears is what draws people to Denali. Three years ago I visited Denali in September.

The mountain was out and the fall colors were spectacular. I saw sheep, moose and wolves. I returned to the park this September and saw all of the same incredible sights, except I saw no wolves. There was a palpable emptiness to the area near the entrance where the boundary pack had been active and where I had seen wolves during my last visit.

As an avid hunter and wildlife viewer, I realize there are no guarantees when it comes to harvesting or viewing wildlife. But my experience and sense of emptiness when I visited Denali this fall is borne out by Park Service statistics. In recent years, visitors had a roughly 1 in 4 chance of seeing a wolf. This year, with the boundary pack gone and wolf numbers down in the rest of the park, the chance of seeing a wolf went down to near zero

A Denali Park Gray Wolf

.

So here's the question: Should we give 400,000 visitors a reasonable chance of seeing a wild wolf in Denali National Park or one or two trappers a slightly larger area to trap? Alaska is a big place; we have room to accommodate wolf trapping and hunting and wolf viewing. The eastern and northeastern boundary of Denali National Park is a place where we Alaskans should give wolf viewing the priority.

I urge the Board of Game to accept the public petition before it to take up this issue and rescind its decision to open the area along the eastern and northeastern boundary of Denali National Park to wolf trapping.

Frank Rue was commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game from 1995 to 2002.