To: Meril, Rick
Subject: RE: new paper by Mech FYI -- another cautionary paper
Rick
Debates among wildlifers can be delicious! Stan PS: I tend to believe that the theory of trophic cascades is defensible, but variable in time and space. Nature is not static, and tends to reach an equilibrium following ecological changes, such as after recolonization of apex predators.
For instance, Great Horned Owls dominated former Peregrine Falcon nesting habitat following the DDT era, and impeded the reintroduction program for peregrines in the Upper Midwest. Eventually peregrines altered the balance and were able to hold their own and defend their recolonized territories.
I think mesopredators should be able to adapt, too. The science should decifer the mechanisms and cause and effect relationships instead of simply counting critters and trying to guess why the numbers change, in my opinion. But it is easier said than done, and funding is always an issue.
Take care,
Stan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophic cascades in Yellowstone: The first 15 years after wolf reintroduction
- William J. Ripple
- Robert L. Beschta
- Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States
Abstract
The 1995/1996 reintroduction of gray wolves (Canis lupus) into Yellowstone National Park after a 70 year absence has allowed for studies of tri-trophic cascades involving wolves, elk (Cervus elaphus), and plant species such as aspen (Populus tremuloides), cottonwoods (Populus spp.), and willows (Salix spp.).To investigate the status of this cascade, in September of 2010 we repeated an earlier survey of aspen and measured browsing and heights of young aspen in 97 stands along four streams in the Lamar River catchment of the park's northern winter range. We found that browsing on the five tallest young aspen in each stand decreased from 100% of all measured leaders in 1998 to means of <25% in the uplands and <20% in riparian areas by 2010.
Correspondingly, aspen recruitment (i.e., growth of seedlings/sprouts above the browse level of ungulates) increased as browsing decreased over time in these same stands. We repeated earlier inventories of cottonwoods and found that recruitment had also increased in recent years. We also synthesized studies on trophic cascades published during the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction. Synthesis results generally indicate that the reintroduction of wolves restored a trophic cascade with woody browse species growing taller and canopy cover increasing in some, but not all places.
After wolf reintroduction, elk populations decreased, but both beaver (Caster canadensis) and bison (Bison bison) numbers increased, possibly due to the increase in available woody plants and herbaceous forage resulting from less competition with elk. Trophic cascades research during the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction indicated substantial initial effects on both plants and animals, but northern Yellowstone still appears to be in the early stages of ecosystem recovery.
In ecosystems where wolves have been displaced or locally extirpated, their reintroduction may represent a particularly effective approach for passive restoration.
Wolves chasing Elk-----part of the web of life for millenia in North America |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
The role of large predators in maintaining riparian plant communities and river morphology
AbstractStudies assessing the potential for large predators to affect, via trophic cascades, the dynamics of riparian plant communities and the morphology of river channels have been largely absent in the scientific literature. Herein, we consider the results of recent studies involving three national parks in the western United States: Yellowstone, Olympic, and Zion. Within each park, key large predators were extirpated or displaced in the early 1900s and subsequent browsing pressure by native ungulates initiated long-term declines in recruitment (i.e., growth of seedlings/sprouts into tall saplings and trees) of palatable woody species and impairment of other resources.Channel responses to browsing-suppressed riparian vegetation included increased widths of active channels via accelerated bank erosion, erosion of floodplains and erraces, increased area of unvegetated alluvium, channel incision, and increased braiding. A reduced frequency of overbank flows indicated these rivers have become increasingly disconnected from historical floodplains because of channel widening/incision. Results from Zion National Park also identified major biodiversity affects (e.g., reduced abundance of plant and animal species). Although these studies were conducted in national parks, results may have implications concerning riparian plant communities, biodiversity, and channel morphology for streams and rivers draining other public lands in the western US. It is on these lands that native and introduced ungulates have often heavily utilized riparian areas, largely in the absence of key predators, with significant consequences to plant communities and channels. Graphical abstractResearch highlights
► We assessed trophic cascades associated with large mammalian predators. ► Loss of large predators allowed ungulates to degrade riparian plant communities. ► Browsing-suppressed riparian vegetation ultimately led to altered channels.
Keywords
Figures and tables from this article:
Missing lynx and trophic cascades in food webs: A reply to Ripple et al.† John R. Squires1,*, Nicholas J. DeCesare2, Mark Hebblewhite2, Joel Berger3 Article first published online: 28 AUG 2012 The Wildlife Society, 2012 Abstract Ripple et al. (2011) proposed a hypothesis that the recovery of gray wolves (Canis lupus) may positively affect the viability of threatened Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) populations in the contiguous United States through indirect species interactions. Ripple et al. (2011) proposed 2 key trophic linkages connecting wolf restoration with lynx recovery. First, recovering wolf populations may benefit lynx through reduced interference and exploitative competition with coyotes (C. latrans). Second, recovering wolf populations may benefit lynx through reduced exploitative competition among ungulates and snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), the primary prey of lynx. Both proposed linkages have weak or contradictory empirical support in the available literature on lynx–hare ecology, casting doubt on the utility of Ripple et al.'s (2011) hypothesis. Debate over Ripple et al.'s (2011) hypothesis demonstrates the importance of experimental or comparative documentation when proposing trophic cascades in complex food webs. In this case, publishing unsupported opinions as hypotheses that concern complex trophic interactions is a potential disservice to lynx conservation through misallocated research, conservation funding, and misplaced public perception. © 2012 The Wildlife Society. |
No comments:
Post a Comment