18 mortalities reported during 2012
With improved habitat security on federal lands and continued public education, the number of grizzly bear mortalities in the Northern Rockies was relatively low at 18 in 2012.With the exceptions of 30 grizzly deaths in 2011 and 34 in 2004, the number of human-caused bear deaths in and around the Northern Continental Divide recovery area has hovered between 14 and 26 for most of the last 12 years. The low was 11 in 2008.
The work of state bear management specialists such as Tim Manley, who covers the Flathead area, has been significant because of the encroachment of homes into bear habitat and a growing bear population that continues to use those areas.
“We are seeing increasing numbers of bears, but our mortalities are remaining steady,” Servheen said.
Seven of the 2012 mortalities occurred in the Flathead Valley area. The highest cause of deaths for the year was illegal kills, which accounted for seven bears.
Over the last 12 years, however, management control has been the main cause of death, accounting for 32 percent of the 262 bear deaths, followed by illegal kills at 18 percent, automobile collisions at 11 percent and train collisions at 9 percent.
Servheen noted that no bears were killed by trains this year.“Trains and vehicles are kind of a constant source, so it’s nice to see we didn’t have any train collisions this year, but that doesn’t mean we won’t see some in the future,” he said.Servheen pointed out another significant trend — a decline in bear deaths on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service.
From 1974 to 1999, 58 percent of bear deaths were on Forest Service lands that account for 61 percent of the recovery area. But since the year 2000, only 39 percent of mortalities have occurred on Forest Service lands.Servheen attributes that to improved habitat security related to forest road closures as well as food storage rules in Forest Service camping areas.
But an increase in the percentage of bear deaths on private lands also comes into play. Since 1970, 18 percent of grizzly deaths occurred on private lands. But since 2000, 26 percent have been on private land.
“We have more bears on private land now and we have more private landowners in bear habitat with more people settling in Western Montana,” Servheen said, noting how it is obvious there are homes in rural Flathead areas where there weren’t any 10 to 20 years ago. “Often people move in with habits that are not compatible in bear habitat,” he said. “Hobby farmers with chickens in bear habitat — that’s the stuff that causes problems.”
Bear management specialists have been spending more time coaching landowners about electric fencing and other measures to reduce conflicts. Jamie Jonkel, the specialist who covers the southern end of the recovery area, refers to chickens as “the new garbage” for causing conflicts. With the overall improvement in the Northern Rockies bear population, state, federal and tribal agencies continue to work toward removing grizzly bears from endangered species listing.
Servheen said a draft conservation strategy — a plan for managing bears after delisting — will be released for public review and comment in the next few months.“Before we propose delisting, we have to have this,” Servheen said. “It institutionalizes most of the protections that are currently in place.” “Delisting doesn’t mean going back to the way it used to be,” he said. “It doesn’t mean go back and build all the roads you want and there are no limits on mortalities.”
But delisting could clear the way for limited grizzly bear hunting. “There might be a hunt,” Servheen said. “Hunting will never threaten the grizzly bear population. It will always be done under a very conservative approach with very sustainable limits.”
“Our mortalities are remaining pretty steady,” said Chris Servheen, grizzly bear recovery coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “I think it’s the ongoing efforts of the bear managers, both the tribal and state guys, dealing with a lot of conflicts and working with a lot of new land owners.”
“We are seeing increasing numbers of bears, but our mortalities are remaining steady,” Servheen said.
Seven of the 2012 mortalities occurred in the Flathead Valley area. The highest cause of deaths for the year was illegal kills, which accounted for seven bears.
Over the last 12 years, however, management control has been the main cause of death, accounting for 32 percent of the 262 bear deaths, followed by illegal kills at 18 percent, automobile collisions at 11 percent and train collisions at 9 percent.
Servheen noted that no bears were killed by trains this year.“Trains and vehicles are kind of a constant source, so it’s nice to see we didn’t have any train collisions this year, but that doesn’t mean we won’t see some in the future,” he said.Servheen pointed out another significant trend — a decline in bear deaths on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service.
From 1974 to 1999, 58 percent of bear deaths were on Forest Service lands that account for 61 percent of the recovery area. But since the year 2000, only 39 percent of mortalities have occurred on Forest Service lands.Servheen attributes that to improved habitat security related to forest road closures as well as food storage rules in Forest Service camping areas.
But an increase in the percentage of bear deaths on private lands also comes into play. Since 1970, 18 percent of grizzly deaths occurred on private lands. But since 2000, 26 percent have been on private land.
“We have more bears on private land now and we have more private landowners in bear habitat with more people settling in Western Montana,” Servheen said, noting how it is obvious there are homes in rural Flathead areas where there weren’t any 10 to 20 years ago. “Often people move in with habits that are not compatible in bear habitat,” he said. “Hobby farmers with chickens in bear habitat — that’s the stuff that causes problems.”
Bear management specialists have been spending more time coaching landowners about electric fencing and other measures to reduce conflicts. Jamie Jonkel, the specialist who covers the southern end of the recovery area, refers to chickens as “the new garbage” for causing conflicts. With the overall improvement in the Northern Rockies bear population, state, federal and tribal agencies continue to work toward removing grizzly bears from endangered species listing.
Servheen said a draft conservation strategy — a plan for managing bears after delisting — will be released for public review and comment in the next few months.“Before we propose delisting, we have to have this,” Servheen said. “It institutionalizes most of the protections that are currently in place.” “Delisting doesn’t mean going back to the way it used to be,” he said. “It doesn’t mean go back and build all the roads you want and there are no limits on mortalities.”
But delisting could clear the way for limited grizzly bear hunting. “There might be a hunt,” Servheen said. “Hunting will never threaten the grizzly bear population. It will always be done under a very conservative approach with very sustainable limits.”
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment