you over. It’s wise to step out of the way.”
Burguess is a biologist with the New Jersey Division
of Fish and Wildlife. For three months every winter,
this is his primary job. Working with a team of
biologists and technicians, he crawls into dens with
sleeping black bears. He shoots them with
tranquilizers. The bears leave their dens, either
sleeping and pulled out slowly by the humans;
or awake, quickly and of their own accord. Once
outside, the bears are measured, weighed, and
tested for disease.
Most important, the bears are counted.
This makes Burguess’s work controversial,
since the census is intertwined with New Jersey’s
annual bear hunt. By counting a portion of the
state’s bears, biologists determine how many
of their cubs survived the summer, and estimate
how fast the population is growing. Come December
and the state’s six-day bear season, this combination
of science and guesswork helps the Fish and
Wildlife division decide how many bears may
be shot by hunters.
To some people, that makes Burguess a hero
.“Jumping into dens full of black bears? It’s
amazing the work Kelcey Burguess does,”
says John Rogalo, chairman of the New Jersey
State Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs.
To others, he is anything but.“Kelcey has a
passion for killing,” says Angi Metler, executive
director of the Animal Protection League of New
Jersey. “They do the census only to make sure
there are enough bears to kill. It is inhumane.”
No matter which side is right, both sides agree
the problem is not the bears. It’s the humans.
There were 3,438 black bears living in the hills
of northwest New Jersey in 2009, according to
an estimate by the Department of Environmental
Protection. Four hunting seasons later the
population is down to about 2,500, Burguess says.
Even with 8.8 million people, New Jersey still has
plenty of food and habitat for bears, which is why
the species has been spotted in every county in
the state.
“Biologically, we could handle a lot more bears,
” Burguess says.
But biology isn’t the only factor, of course. Many
residents and municipalities in bear country
oppose measures that would require them to
place household garbage in bear-resistant cans.
Even after the housing meltdown and subsequent
recession, New Jersey continues to build suburban
developments deep inside some of the state’s best
bear habitats. This combination of proximity and
easy access to human food increases the likelihood
that bears and humans will meet.
A resident in Roxbury returned home with her
daughters last September to find a momma
bear and her cubs playing on her backyard
swing set. Photos of the cute romping bears
created an Internet sensation.
Eventually, however, one such interaction
will turn tragic. While state agencies and
animal-rights activists disagree over whether
hunting alleviates or exacerbates the problem,
everyone agrees the danger is real.
“Culturally, the residents of New Jersey aren’t
going to tolerate an overabundance of black bears,
” Burguess says. “If they have black bears chasing
their children to the school bus and eating their
pets, they’ll just start shooting them to extinction.”
Burguess hopes to keep that from happening.
He wants the bear population to stay safe and
healthy, which is why he jumps into bear dens
in the middle of winter.
In the field, he and his team apply antibiotics
to bears with infected wounds. When they find
bears with damaged limbs or even broken hips,
they have carried the animals out of the
wilderness and found veterinarians to provide
reduced-cost care.
“A lot of people think we at Fish and Wildlife
think, ‘Aw, just kill it,’Ÿ” he says. “Well we
actually do care about the animals. We’ve
gone to great lengths to try and help them out.”
Bears in N.J.
Black bears are native to New Jersey and were
common through the 1800s. After extensive hunting,
their population by the mid-1950s fell to fewer than
100. The state Fish and Game Council decided in
1953 to classify black bears as a game animal,
which served to limit bear hunting. Due partly to this
decision and also to land preservation efforts, as well
as the shift of former agricultural lands into mature
forests, the population rebounded. The counts cover
the area north of Route 80 and west of Route 287,
and are estimates based on field counts.
2001: 1,777
2003: 1,600-3,200
2005: 2,397
2009: 3,438
2011: 2,800-3,000
2014: 2,500*
*Unofficial estimate
Source: state Fish and Game Council
No comments:
Post a Comment