View the page here: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2014/grizzly-bear-08-21-2014.html
http://union-bulletin.com/news/2014/aug/22/feds-weigh-reintroducing-grizzlies-state/
http://union-bulletin.com/news/2014/aug/22/feds-weigh-reintroducing-grizzlies-state/
Feds weigh reintroducing grizzlies in North Cascades
The National Park Service said Thursday it will consider moving
grizzly
bears into the North Cascade Mountains of Washington state to
aid their
recovery.
grizzly
bears into the North Cascade Mountains of Washington state to
aid their
recovery.
#The agency is launching a three-year process to study a variety
of
options for helping their population. Director Jonathan B. Jarvis
stressed
that the process is required under federal law but no decision
had been made.
of
options for helping their population. Director Jonathan B. Jarvis
stressed
that the process is required under federal law but no decision
had been made.
#Native American tribes and conservation groups have pressed
for years
for the federal government to do more to bring back the bears.
for years
for the federal government to do more to bring back the bears.
#“It marks the potential turning point in the decades-long decline
of the last
grizzly bears remaining on the U.S. West Coast,” Joe Scott,
international
conservation director of Conservation Northwest, said in a
written
of the last
grizzly bears remaining on the U.S. West Coast,” Joe Scott,
international
conservation director of Conservation Northwest, said in a
written
statement. “Without recovery efforts, these bears may soon
be gone forever.”
be gone forever.”
#Numerous grizzly bears roamed north-central Washington in
the past, but
early settlers and trappers killed thousands for fur in the
mid-19th century.
The region’s booming population has also encroached on
their habitat.
the past, but
early settlers and trappers killed thousands for fur in the
mid-19th century.
The region’s booming population has also encroached on
their habitat.
#Federal authorities listed the grizzly bear as threatened in
the lower 48
states in 1975 and ultimately designated
the lower 48
states in 1975 and ultimately designated
five areas in Washington, Idaho, Montana and Wyoming
to focus on
boosting the population.
to focus on
boosting the population.
#A small population of grizzlies exists in Washington’s
Selkirk Mountains,
and the park service says the animals have been seen
recently in the
Cascades north of the Canadian border. But they haven’t
been seen in
the Washington Cascades in years.
Selkirk Mountains,
and the park service says the animals have been seen
recently in the
Cascades north of the Canadian border. But they haven’t
been seen in
the Washington Cascades in years.
#Officials have been looking hard, too. In the past three
years, they’ve
set up “hair-snare” traps — basically bait surrounded by
stretches of
barbed wire that snag samples of a bear’s hair — in
about one-third of
the North Cascades region. The traps have produce
many samples of
black bear hair, as confirmed by DNA tests, but no
grizzly hair, said
Bob Everitt, northwest Washington regional director
of the state Fish
and Wildlife Department.
years, they’ve
set up “hair-snare” traps — basically bait surrounded by
stretches of
barbed wire that snag samples of a bear’s hair — in
about one-third of
the North Cascades region. The traps have produce
many samples of
black bear hair, as confirmed by DNA tests, but no
grizzly hair, said
Bob Everitt, northwest Washington regional director
of the state Fish
and Wildlife Department.
#“It doesn’t mean there aren’t grizzly bears, but it sure
suggests they’re
pretty rare,” Everitt said.
suggests they’re
pretty rare,” Everitt said.
#In 1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service added a
chapter on the North
Cascades to its grizzly bear recovery plan. The
document said that within
five years, authorities should evaluate options for
recovering bears in the
region, which covers a 9,800-square-mile swath
of north-central
Washington, including the eastern and western
slopes of the Cascades,
North Cascades National Park, Lake Chelan
National Recreation Area,
Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest and
Mount Baker-Snoqualmie
National Forest.
chapter on the North
Cascades to its grizzly bear recovery plan. The
document said that within
five years, authorities should evaluate options for
recovering bears in the
region, which covers a 9,800-square-mile swath
of north-central
Washington, including the eastern and western
slopes of the Cascades,
North Cascades National Park, Lake Chelan
National Recreation Area,
Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest and
Mount Baker-Snoqualmie
National Forest.
#It suggested that a sustainable grizzly
population in the North Cascades
might be about 200 to 400 bears.
population in the North Cascades
might be about 200 to 400 bears.
#Since that chapter was added, some work
has been done to improve
conditions for grizzlies in the North
has been done to improve
conditions for grizzlies in the North
Cascades that mainly involved securing
garbage to keep bears away
from humans, Everitt said.
garbage to keep bears away
from humans, Everitt said.
#“There’s only so much you can do when
you don’t have any bears,”
he added. Lawmakers made clear in the
mid-1990s that they didn’t
want bears introduced in the state.
you don’t have any bears,”
he added. Lawmakers made clear in the
mid-1990s that they didn’t
want bears introduced in the state.
#A law passed at the time directs the Fish
and Wildlife Department to
work to encourage the natural recovery
of grizzly populations but
says: “Grizzly bears shall not be transplanted
or introduced into the
state. Only grizzly
and Wildlife Department to
work to encourage the natural recovery
of grizzly populations but
says: “Grizzly bears shall not be transplanted
or introduced into the
state. Only grizzly
bears that are native to Washington stat
e may be utilized by the
department for management programs.”
e may be utilized by the
department for management programs.”
#The park service said it would work with
the U.S. Forest Service,
the state and the public in making any
the U.S. Forest Service,
the state and the public in making any
decisions, including about whether to
bring grizzlies into the area.
bring grizzlies into the area.
#“Grizzly bears are controversial,” Everitt
said. “We want to make
sure everyone is heard on this issue
before it gets concluded.”
said. “We want to make
sure everyone is heard on this issue
before it gets concluded.”
No comments:
Post a Comment