Visitor Counter

hitwebcounter web counter
Visitors Since Blog Created in March 2010

Click Below to:

Add Blog to Favorites

Coyotes-Wolves-Cougars.blogspot.com

Grizzly bears, black bears, wolves, coyotes, cougars/ mountain lions,bobcats, wolverines, lynx, foxes, fishers and martens are the suite of carnivores that originally inhabited North America after the Pleistocene extinctions. This site invites research, commentary, point/counterpoint on that suite of native animals (predator and prey) that inhabited The Americas circa 1500-at the initial point of European exploration and subsequent colonization. Landscape ecology, journal accounts of explorers and frontiersmen, genetic evaluations of museum animals, peer reviewed 20th and 21st century research on various aspects of our "Wild America" as well as subjective commentary from expert and layman alike. All of the above being revealed and discussed with the underlying goal of one day seeing our Continent rewilded.....Where big enough swaths of open space exist with connective corridors to other large forest, meadow, mountain, valley, prairie, desert and chaparral wildlands.....Thereby enabling all of our historic fauna, including man, to live in a sustainable and healthy environment. - Blogger Rick

Subscribe via email to get updates

Enter your email address:

Receive New Posting Alerts

(A Maximum of One Alert Per Day)

Friday, February 13, 2015

The "silent killer" of biodiversity and rewilding comes back to runaway human population.............When you see the irresponsible newspaper, magazine and tv reports stating that the rate of world population is slowing, do not be fooled into thinking that we have somehow come to grips with the "heavy footprint" of the human being...................An excerpt from Dave Foreman's recently published MAN SWARM brings us back to reality on this subject: "Say that the percentage rate of growth slows from 2.1 percent to 1.7 percent a year over a few years while the absolute increase of yearly growth goes from sixty-four million to seventy-nine million to ninety-three million in that time"........... "How can this be"?............... "Because there are more women giving birth at the lower rate"....................."Latest population numbers show lopsided percentages under fifteen years old"................ "With such a landslide of youngsters coming into their childbearing years, even if we reduce birth rates to the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman, it will take two or three generations, or fifty to seventy-five years, before the population stabilizes"





Rewilding Institute News

Link to The Rewilding Institute


Posted: 12 Feb 2015 10:12 AM PST
pop growthIt's all too common to believe that if birth rates decline it means population growth is slowing. As Man Swarm discusses, there's a lot more to the picture. Here are three important factors that are too often overlooked:
Percentage Rate versus Absolute Increase of Growth

It is critical to look at both percentage rates of growth and absolute increases. From Man Swarm, "Say that the percentage rate of growth slows from 2.1 percent to 1.7 percent a year over a few years while the absolute increase of yearly growth goes from sixty-four million to seventy-nine million to ninety-three million in that time. How can this be? Because there are more women giving birth at the lower rate."
Age Structure

As Foreman explains, "Another way to look at population is by population age structure. Even if there is a drop in a nation's growth rate, its population still rises for many years. Why? As big segments of the population go through their childbearing years, they have many, many children. In 1995, one-third of Earth's population (two billion) was under fifteen years of age, while only about five percent of it (three hundred million people) was over sixty-five. The youngsters are making far more babies now than the number of oldsters that are dying; therefore, the population is growing."

"Latest population numbers show lopsided percentages under fifteen years old. With such a landslide of youngsters coming into their childbearing years, even if we reduce birth rates to the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman, it will take two or three generations, or fifty to seventy-five years, before the population stabilizes."
Longevity

"J. Kenneth Smail, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at Kenyon College, speaks to another piece of the puzzle that's mostly overlooked. 'Ongoing global gains in human longevity will continue to make a major contribution to world population expansion over the next half-century, regardless of whatever progress might be made in reducing fertility'…In other words, how longevity grows population is a big deal."

To add to these three is this Paul Ehrlich quote: "[T]he world's population will continue to grow as long as the birth rate exceeds the death rate; it's as simple as that."
Want to track population growth? Bookmark the U.S. Census Population Clock. Watch one birth every X seconds, one death every X seconds, one net international migrant every X seconds and how many seconds it takes for a "net gain" of one person – the day this posted that net gain in the U.S. was one person every 14 seconds.

Now that is population growth. Don't let birth rate declines fool you. Just three hundred years ago, in the U.S. we were six hundred ten million. We are adding more than that every ten years. As Foreman sums it, "Human population has exploded gruesomely in the last two hundred years. And it will keep shooting up for some time."

Man Swarm is available in soft cover here on this site and on major online retail sites.




 

No comments: