Read full article by clicking on this link: https://peerj.com/articles/4293/
Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?
Abstract
Background
Interspecific competition affects species
fitness, community assemblages and
structure, and the geographic
distributions of species. Established
dominance hierarchies among species
mitigate the need for fighting and
contribute to the realized niche for
subordinate species. This is especiall
important for apex predators, many
of which simultaneous contend with
the costs of competition with more
dominant species and the costs
associated with human hunting and
lethal management.
fitness, community assemblages and
structure, and the geographic
distributions of species. Established
dominance hierarchies among species
mitigate the need for fighting and
contribute to the realized niche for
subordinate species. This is especiall
important for apex predators, many
of which simultaneous contend with
the costs of competition with more
dominant species and the costs
associated with human hunting and
lethal management.
Methods
Pumas are a widespread solitary felid
heavily regulated through hunting to
reduce conflicts with livestock and
people. Across their range, pumas
overlap with six apex predators
(gray wolf, grizzly bear, American
black bear, jaguar, coyote, maned wolf),
two of which (gray wolf, grizzly bear)
are currently expanding in North
America following recovery efforts.
We conducted a literature search
to assess whether pumas were
subordinate or dominant with
sympatric apex predators, as
well as with three felid
mesocarnivores with similar
ecology (ocelot, bobcat, Canada
lynx). We also conducted an
analysis of the spatial distributions
of pumas and their dominant
sympatric competitors to estimate
in what part of their range, pumas
are dominant versus subordinate.
heavily regulated through hunting to
reduce conflicts with livestock and
people. Across their range, pumas
overlap with six apex predators
(gray wolf, grizzly bear, American
black bear, jaguar, coyote, maned wolf),
two of which (gray wolf, grizzly bear)
are currently expanding in North
America following recovery efforts.
We conducted a literature search
to assess whether pumas were
subordinate or dominant with
sympatric apex predators, as
well as with three felid
mesocarnivores with similar
ecology (ocelot, bobcat, Canada
lynx). We also conducted an
analysis of the spatial distributions
of pumas and their dominant
sympatric competitors to estimate
in what part of their range, pumas
are dominant versus subordinate.
Results
We used 64 sources to assess
dominance among pumas and
other apex predators, and 13
sources to assess their relationships
with felid mesocarnivores. Evidence
suggested that wolves, grizzly bears,
black bears, and jaguars are
dominant over pumas, but that
pumas are dominant over coyotes
and maned wolves. Evidence
suggested that pumas are also
dominant over all three felid
mesocarnivores with which they
share range. More broadly, pumas
are subordinate to at least one
other apex carnivore in 10,799,252
(47.5%) of their 22,735,268 km2
range across North and South
America.
dominance among pumas and
other apex predators, and 13
sources to assess their relationships
with felid mesocarnivores. Evidence
suggested that wolves, grizzly bears,
black bears, and jaguars are
dominant over pumas, but that
pumas are dominant over coyotes
and maned wolves. Evidence
suggested that pumas are also
dominant over all three felid
mesocarnivores with which they
share range. More broadly, pumas
are subordinate to at least one
other apex carnivore in 10,799,252
(47.5%) of their 22,735,268 km2
range across North and South
America.
Discussion
Subordinate pumas change their
habitat use, suffer displacement
at food sources, likely experience
increased energetic demands
from harassment, exhibit increased
starvation, and are sometimes
directly killed in competitive
interactions with dominant
competitors. Nevertheless,
we lack research clearly linking
the costs of competition to puma
fitness. Further, we lack research
that assesses the influence of
human effects simultaneous with
the negative effects of competition
with other sympatric carnivores.
Until the time that we understand
whether competitive effects are
additive with human management,
or even potentially synergistic,
we encourage caution among
managers responsible for
determining harvest limits for pumas
and other subordinate, apex
carnivores in areas where they are
sympatric with dominant species.
This may be especially important
information for managers working
in regions where wolves and brown
bears are recolonizing and recovering,
and historic competition scenarios
among multiple apex predators
are being realized.
habitat use, suffer displacement
at food sources, likely experience
increased energetic demands
from harassment, exhibit increased
starvation, and are sometimes
directly killed in competitive
interactions with dominant
competitors. Nevertheless,
we lack research clearly linking
the costs of competition to puma
fitness. Further, we lack research
that assesses the influence of
human effects simultaneous with
the negative effects of competition
with other sympatric carnivores.
Until the time that we understand
whether competitive effects are
additive with human management,
or even potentially synergistic,
we encourage caution among
managers responsible for
determining harvest limits for pumas
and other subordinate, apex
carnivores in areas where they are
sympatric with dominant species.
This may be especially important
information for managers working
in regions where wolves and brown
bears are recolonizing and recovering,
and historic competition scenarios
among multiple apex predators
are being realized.
.
Bold arrows denote dominance, and point from the dominant species to the subordinate. Thin arrows denote some evidence to the contrary. (A) gray wolf (Canis lupus), (B) grizzly bear (Ursus arctos), (C) American black bear (Ursus americanus), (D) jaguar (Panthera unca), (E) puma (Puma concolor), (F) maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), (G) coyote (Canis latrans). Drawings by Mark Elbroch
Wolf Pack fighting a Puma
Bold arrows denote dominance, and point from the dominant species to the subordinate. Thin arrows denote some evidence to the contrary. (A) gray wolf (Canis lupus), (B) grizzly bear (Ursus arctos), (C) American black bear (Ursus americanus), (D) jaguar (Panthera unca), (E) puma (Puma concolor), (F) maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), (G) coyote (Canis latrans). Drawings by Mark Elbroch
The extant range of pumas in North and South America. The light green denotes the portion of puma range where they are the only or dominant apex predator, and the orange denotes the portion of puma range where they are subordinate to at minimum one other apex predator. Source: ESRI, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AE, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, CIS User Community
The extant range of pumas in North and South America. The light green denotes the portion of puma range where they are the only or dominant apex predator, and the orange denotes the portion of puma range where they are subordinate to at minimum one other apex predator. Source: ESRI, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AE, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, CIS User Community
Grizzly Bear fighting Puma
Cite this as
2018. Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?PeerJ 6:e4293 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4293
Cite this as
2018. Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?PeerJ 6:e4293 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4293
No comments:
Post a Comment