The range of the American Bison is mapped above, with the plains bison in darker brown and the larger woods bison in lighter brown. The lightest color denotes the range extent of Ice Age bison.
http://www.vanwagnermusic.com/vanwagnermusic/buffalo.htm
History of Buffalo in Pennsylvania by Watershed.
The strongest evidence of Bison relates to the Ohio River watershed. There are several 18th century accounts of buffalo sightings in the southwest part of the commonwealth. The Moravian missionary John Heckewelder, who crossed the Allegany Mountains over sixty times and logged 30,000 miles on the frontier, recorded them in this region in the 1770’s. In 1773 he documented meeting an Indian near Marietta, Ohio, “on his way home from a hunting trip. He had shot a buffalo ox, of which there are many hearouts.”1 This is less than 50 miles from the Pennsylvania border.
Another reference to buffalo in this region comes from Lewis Ourry’s letter from fort Bedford to HenryBouquet on Feb 21, 1760: “Yesterday I forwarded downwards the General’s Baggage, consisting of 5 wagon, each drawn by 6 horses one slope wagon by 4, and a chair by 1 and 5 spare in all 40, and a young Buffalo.” The General he referred to was John Stanwix, who had been stationed at Pittsburgh since August 1759. Since there was no British post beyond Fort Pitt at this time, this buffalo almost certainly came from the immediate region.
Another reference to buffalo in this region comes from Lewis Ourry’s letter from fort Bedford to Henry
Some researchers have suggested that a severe drought on the plains in the 1600’s encouraged buffalo herds to migrate up the Mississippi River to the Ohio River and its headwaters.6 In addition, thousands of acres of land originally cultivated by Native Americans were temporarily abandoned as white encroachment and European diseases forced Indians from their lands.
Some have argued that buffalo could not have existed in Pennsylvania due to a lack of grazing habitat. Indeed, the heavily forested ecosystem that was Pennsylvania in the 17th an 18th centuries did not provide much in the way of food for bison. Instead, Pennsylvania would have classified as fringe habitat - providing just enough low land and floodplain grazing to support the occasional buffalo.
Also, the temporary availability of what had been Native American cropland couldaccount for a small natural food supply for grazing ruminants just about the time that the specie was moving east in its range. Whether due to human demographic changes or by natural processes, the plains buffalo was beginning to broaden its range towards south and western Pennsylvania. This leads to the question of exactly which watershed regions of Pennsylvania may have supported some buffalo.
As previously established, buffalo were present in the Ohio River watershed. An additional account of buffalo in this region comes from soldiers from Fort Cumberland in 1763. While serving under Captain Luke Collins the men followed a group of Indians up to the Cheat River, A tributary of the Monongahela River, and attacked them while “they were barbequing a Buffaloe, not thinking of danger
In the south central portion of the state is the region of the Potomac drainage, here is a possibility that buffalo were occasionally found in this region. In 1612 European explorer Samuel Argall, often a bit off bearing, reported seeing “a great store of cattle as big as kine…” within 15 miles of present day Washington, D.C.11 Maryland, West Virginia, and western Virginia all have solid documented sightings of buffalo.
Pennsylvania contains numerous examples of locations named after buffalo. In frontier culture, people often named their lands after a rare or unique sighting of wildlife, such as White Deer, Bald Eagle, or Native American names like Swatara (“where we feed on eels”) and Moosic (“place of moose”). The sheer numbers of buffalo place names makes a very strong case that some of the earliest white settlers in the Susquehanna region almost certainly encountered buffalo or Indians who related buffalo sightings.
Dots indicate buffalo place names in Pennsylvania. By Karl Shellenberger 2007
The year, 1801, is in the same general time period when the ani
mals were killed off in neighboring states. By 1730 buffalo were gone from the tidewater region of Virginia; in 1808 the last Ohio buffalo was killed,T and by 1825 the last was killed in western Virginia.15 The location of the Pennsylvania legend, however, is a bit unexpected. Southwestern Pennsylvania probably had a higher number of buffalo, still far from the herds of thousands described by Shoemaker, but that would be the region expected to harbor the last hold out of the specie. It is possible however that a small herd of animals was pushed to the northeast and temporarily into the Susquehanna Watershed. As various militaries and explorers increased hunting pressure on the area around Fort Pitt, modern day Pittsburgh, the mountains and valleys of central Pennsylvania may have offered a refuge for a short time until that region too began filling with Europeans and their rifles.
It is worth noting that small pockets of grassland habitat did indeed occur along the Susquehanna. In 1743 the botanist William Bartram explored the region and noted “Our journey now lay through very rich bottoms to a creek, six miles from Shamokin [Chillisquaque Creek], a great extent of fruitful low ground still continuing. Here we found a fine meadow of grass on our right, and rich dry ground on the left…” 16 Shamokin was located at modern day Sunbury. Bartram was describing the Chillisquaque creek in the area of modern Montandon. He does not, however, mention seeing any buffalo in his travels through the watershed. That being said, he does not mention other animals such as elk, moose, or deer, all of which did occur there.
---------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.wildwill.net/blog/2015/07/12/the-history-of-bison-in-southeastern-north-america-2/
Some have argued that buffalo could not have existed in Pennsylvania due to a lack of grazing habitat. Indeed, the heavily forested ecosystem that was Pennsylvania in the 17th an 18th centuries did not provide much in the way of food for bison. Instead, Pennsylvania would have classified as fringe habitat - providing just enough low land and floodplain grazing to support the occasional buffalo.
Also, the temporary availability of what had been Native American cropland could
As previously established, buffalo were present in the Ohio River watershed. An additional account of buffalo in this region comes from soldiers from Fort Cumberland in 1763. While serving under Captain Luke Collins the men followed a group of Indians up to the Cheat River, A tributary of the Monongahela River, and attacked them while “they were barbequing a Buffaloe, not thinking of danger
In the south central portion of the state is the region of the Potomac drainage, here is a possibility that buffalo were occasionally found in this region. In 1612 European explorer Samuel Argall, often a bit off bearing, reported seeing “a great store of cattle as big as kine…” within 15 miles of present day Washington, D.C.11 Maryland, West Virginia, and western Virginia all have solid documented sightings of buffalo.
Pennsylvania contains numerous examples of locations named after buffalo. In frontier culture, people often named their lands after a rare or unique sighting of wildlife, such as White Deer, Bald Eagle, or Native American names like Swatara (“where we feed on eels”) and Moosic (“place of moose”). The sheer numbers of buffalo place names makes a very strong case that some of the earliest white settlers in the Susquehanna region almost certainly encountered buffalo or Indians who related buffalo sightings.
Dots indicate buffalo place names in Pennsylvania. By Karl Shellenberger 2007
The year, 1801, is in the same general time period when the ani
mals were killed off in neighboring states. By 1730 buffalo were gone from the tidewater region of Virginia; in 1808 the last Ohio buffalo was killed,T and by 1825 the last was killed in western Virginia.15 The location of the Pennsylvania legend, however, is a bit unexpected. Southwestern Pennsylvania probably had a higher number of buffalo, still far from the herds of thousands described by Shoemaker, but that would be the region expected to harbor the last hold out of the specie. It is possible however that a small herd of animals was pushed to the northeast and temporarily into the Susquehanna Watershed. As various militaries and explorers increased hunting pressure on the area around Fort Pitt, modern day Pittsburgh, the mountains and valleys of central Pennsylvania may have offered a refuge for a short time until that region too began filling with Europeans and their rifles.
It is worth noting that small pockets of grassland habitat did indeed occur along the Susquehanna. In 1743 the botanist William Bartram explored the region and noted “Our journey now lay through very rich bottoms to a creek, six miles from Shamokin [Chillisquaque Creek], a great extent of fruitful low ground still continuing. Here we found a fine meadow of grass on our right, and rich dry ground on the left…” 16 Shamokin was located at modern day Sunbury. Bartram was describing the Chillisquaque creek in the area of modern Montandon. He does not, however, mention seeing any buffalo in his travels through the watershed. That being said, he does not mention other animals such as elk, moose, or deer, all of which did occur there.
---------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.wildwill.net/blog/2015/07/12/the-history-of-bison-in-southeastern-north-america-2/
No comments:
Post a Comment