Grizzly bear
deserves
protection
Opinion: Encroachment
on
habitat in Western and
Northern
Canada threatens to
push species
into at-risk territory
BY JEFF GAILUS, SPECIAL TO THE VANCOUVER SUN
The grizzly bear deserves legal protection under Canada's Species at Risk Act, argues writer Jeff Gailus.
It's that time of the decade again, when Canadians
and the federal politicians who represent them get a
chance to safeguard the future of one of our most
iconic wildlife species. Every 10 years, the Committee
on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada
(COSEWIC) carefully considers the most up-to-date
science in its assessment of the status of Canada's
grizzly bear population and, after careful consideration
and more than a little hand-wringing, comes up with a
designation for the greatest of all Canadian bears.
and the federal politicians who represent them get a
chance to safeguard the future of one of our most
iconic wildlife species. Every 10 years, the Committee
on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada
(COSEWIC) carefully considers the most up-to-date
science in its assessment of the status of Canada's
grizzly bear population and, after careful consideration
and more than a little hand-wringing, comes up with a
designation for the greatest of all Canadian bears.
Last time this happened, in 2002, COSEWIC found
grizzly bears in Western and Northern Canada faced
a host of threats and uncertainties, and decided that,
while not endangered, the grizzly was certainly a
"species of special concern," especially in southern
Alberta and B.C. "Bears living in portions of the
southern fringe of Canadian distribution are far from
secure from the consequences of burgeoning human
populations and activities," COSEWIC warned in 2002.
"The genetic and geographic continuity that now
prevents their identification as distinct population
units is at risk …. Preventing the slow northward
migration of this line depends on active steps to
conserve these insular and peninsular populations."
grizzly bears in Western and Northern Canada faced
a host of threats and uncertainties, and decided that,
while not endangered, the grizzly was certainly a
"species of special concern," especially in southern
Alberta and B.C. "Bears living in portions of the
southern fringe of Canadian distribution are far from
secure from the consequences of burgeoning human
populations and activities," COSEWIC warned in 2002.
"The genetic and geographic continuity that now
prevents their identification as distinct population
units is at risk …. Preventing the slow northward
migration of this line depends on active steps to
conserve these insular and peninsular populations."
But for some reason David Anderson, the Liberal
environment minister at that time, decided against
taking the next logical step: listing the grizzly under
Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA). His
successors in the Environment Ministry, both Liberal
and Conservatives, did the same and the species has
sat in legal limbo, unprotected, for more than a decade
under the watch of five different environment ministers.
environment minister at that time, decided against
taking the next logical step: listing the grizzly under
Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA). His
successors in the Environment Ministry, both Liberal
and Conservatives, did the same and the species has
sat in legal limbo, unprotected, for more than a decade
under the watch of five different environment ministers.
Ten years later, COSEWIC has reached the same verdict.
Canada's grizzly bears face the same host of threats
and uncertainties they did in 2002, and are the same
"species of special concern" that deserve the federa
l protections afforded them under SARA.
Canada's grizzly bears face the same host of threats
and uncertainties they did in 2002, and are the same
"species of special concern" that deserve the federa
l protections afforded them under SARA.
"A number of populations in the southern extent of its
range in Alberta and southern B.C. are known to be
declining," COSEWIC's 2012 report reads, and "their
poor condition in some parts of the range, combined
with their naturally low reproductive rates and increasing
pressures of resource extraction and cumulative impacts
in now intact parts of the range, heighten concern for this
species if such pressures are not successfully reversed."
range in Alberta and southern B.C. are known to be
declining," COSEWIC's 2012 report reads, and "their
poor condition in some parts of the range, combined
with their naturally low reproductive rates and increasing
pressures of resource extraction and cumulative impacts
in now intact parts of the range, heighten concern for this
species if such pressures are not successfully reversed."
Anyone who has seen a grizzly (from a safe distance) in
the Canadian wilderness, and who has likewise noticed
the inexorable march of subdivisions and cutblocks and
roads and oil rigs into once secure bear habitat, knows
the grizzly bear deserves the protection of Canada's
Species at Risk Act. This is particularly salient for the
small and increasingly isolated populations that hang
on in western Alberta and southern B.C. Here,
increasing levels of industrial activity and urban sprawl,
as well as the proliferation of roads that accompany
them, continue to put at risk the future of these
magnificent animals.
the Canadian wilderness, and who has likewise noticed
the inexorable march of subdivisions and cutblocks and
roads and oil rigs into once secure bear habitat, knows
the grizzly bear deserves the protection of Canada's
Species at Risk Act. This is particularly salient for the
small and increasingly isolated populations that hang
on in western Alberta and southern B.C. Here,
increasing levels of industrial activity and urban sprawl,
as well as the proliferation of roads that accompany
them, continue to put at risk the future of these
magnificent animals.
Wildlife management is largely a provincial responsibility,
but Alberta and B.C. in particular have not made good
on their promises over the past 30 years to maintain and
recover ailing grizzly bear populations. While more and
better scientific studies have been conducted, the meaningful development and implementation of recovery plans has
not followed suit.
but Alberta and B.C. in particular have not made good
on their promises over the past 30 years to maintain and
recover ailing grizzly bear populations. While more and
better scientific studies have been conducted, the meaningful development and implementation of recovery plans has
not followed suit.
Since the last COSEWIC assessment, B.C. has developed
recovery plans for only one of its nine "threatened" grizzly
bear populations, in the North Cascades, but has not
implemented them. During the same period, new research
found the grizzly bear population in the South Coast
Mountains has been fragmented into several small
population isolates, some as small as 20 animals. One
of these — in the Garibaldi-Pitt Grizzly Bear Population
Unit just north of Vancouver — has all but disappeared.
And yet industrial and urban development in grizzly bear
habitat continues apace, increasing the risk of further declines.
recovery plans for only one of its nine "threatened" grizzly
bear populations, in the North Cascades, but has not
implemented them. During the same period, new research
found the grizzly bear population in the South Coast
Mountains has been fragmented into several small
population isolates, some as small as 20 animals. One
of these — in the Garibaldi-Pitt Grizzly Bear Population
Unit just north of Vancouver — has all but disappeared.
And yet industrial and urban development in grizzly bear
habitat continues apace, increasing the risk of further declines.
In Alberta, research conducted since 2002 indicates the
grizzly bear population in Canada's wealthiest province is
considerably smaller, and considerably more at risk, than
anyone knew.
grizzly bear population in Canada's wealthiest province is
considerably smaller, and considerably more at risk, than
anyone knew.
Just 700 grizzlies roam the industrialized forests of Alberta's
mountains and foothills. Even Banff National Park, which
should be a safe haven, has become a graveyard for the
bears. The grizzly was listed as a threatened species in
Alberta, but the recovery plan adopted in 2009 has largely
been ignored in favour of business as usual.
mountains and foothills. Even Banff National Park, which
should be a safe haven, has become a graveyard for the
bears. The grizzly was listed as a threatened species in
Alberta, but the recovery plan adopted in 2009 has largely
been ignored in favour of business as usual.
Given the severity of current threats to the grizzly's survival,
and lack of action at the provincial level, it is imperative that
Canada's Conservative government list the grizzly bear on
Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act. There are ample
precedents for such a decision, the most notable of which
is the decision by the current Environment Minister Pete
r Kent to add the polar bear (also designated as a "species
of special concern" by COSEWIC) to Schedule 1 in 2011.
and lack of action at the provincial level, it is imperative that
Canada's Conservative government list the grizzly bear on
Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act. There are ample
precedents for such a decision, the most notable of which
is the decision by the current Environment Minister Pete
r Kent to add the polar bear (also designated as a "species
of special concern" by COSEWIC) to Schedule 1 in 2011.
The grizzly bear, perhaps the most potent symbol of
Canada's wilderness spirit and character, deserves to
be finally protected under Canada's Species at Risk Act.
Canada's wilderness spirit and character, deserves to
be finally protected under Canada's Species at Risk Act.
Jeff Gailus is a the author of the just-released report,
Securing a National Treasure. Originally from Alberta,
Gailus now lives in Missoula, Mont.
Securing a National Treasure. Originally from Alberta,
Gailus now lives in Missoula, Mont.
No comments:
Post a Comment