http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2016/wolf-12-07-2016.html
CENTER FOR BIODIVERSITY 12/7/16 PRESS RELEASE
SAN FRANCISCO— The California Department of Fish and
Wildlife has released its final plan to guide conservation
and management of a small population of gray wolves
well into the future. One of the strengths of the plan,
which was released late Tuesday, is its emphasis
on nonlethal methods to deter conflicts with livestock.
But it would also seek to reduce wolves’ federal
protection status from “endangered” to “threatened”
when the population reaches a threshold of only two
breeding pairs for two consecutive years — far fewer
than what independent scientists say is needed for a
secure population.
OR7-the Oregon Wolf who first prospected into California
In response to public comments on the proposed wolf plan,
the agency stepped back from plans to initiate delisting of
wolves once their population reached only 50 to 75
wolves. The agency also included in the final plan
additional, current, best available scientific literature on
key issues such as the vital ecological role of wolves.
March 21, 2016 of Wolf spotted in Lassen County, Calif
Lassen Cty Pack location(note Oregon is just north of
Calif. state line and is thus far the source population for
the two Calif. packs
But conservation groups say the final plan should have
included specific protections to shield wolves from
clearly identifiable threats such as being mistaken for
coyotes during coyote-killing contests. And the plan failed
to identify key wolf habitat conservation priorities like
connectivity corridors crucial to building healthy,
sustainable populations — a feature that would benefit
not only wolves but other California wildlife as well.
The plan also proposes to initiate aggressive
management actions, which could include killing wolves,
for ungulate population declines “presumed to be
influenced by wolf predation” without a scientific
assessment to determine if wolves,in fact, are the cause.
CENTER FOR BIODIVERSITY 12/7/16 PRESS RELEASE
California Wolf Plan
Sets
Road Map for
Conserving Small
Population
Sets
Road Map for
Conserving Small
Population
Two Breeding Pairs for
Two
Straight Years
Could Trigger Reduced
Protections
Two
Straight Years
Could Trigger Reduced
Protections
Wildlife has released its final plan to guide conservation
and management of a small population of gray wolves
well into the future. One of the strengths of the plan,
which was released late Tuesday, is its emphasis
on nonlethal methods to deter conflicts with livestock.
But it would also seek to reduce wolves’ federal
protection status from “endangered” to “threatened”
when the population reaches a threshold of only two
breeding pairs for two consecutive years — far fewer
than what independent scientists say is needed for a
secure population.
OR7-the Oregon Wolf who first prospected into California
In response to public comments on the proposed wolf plan,
the agency stepped back from plans to initiate delisting of
wolves once their population reached only 50 to 75
wolves. The agency also included in the final plan
additional, current, best available scientific literature on
key issues such as the vital ecological role of wolves.
March 21, 2016 of Wolf spotted in Lassen County, Calif
Lassen Cty Pack location(note Oregon is just north of
Calif. state line and is thus far the source population for
the two Calif. packs
But conservation groups say the final plan should have
included specific protections to shield wolves from
clearly identifiable threats such as being mistaken for
coyotes during coyote-killing contests. And the plan failed
to identify key wolf habitat conservation priorities like
connectivity corridors crucial to building healthy,
sustainable populations — a feature that would benefit
not only wolves but other California wildlife as well.
The plan also proposes to initiate aggressive
management actions, which could include killing wolves,
for ungulate population declines “presumed to be
influenced by wolf predation” without a scientific
assessment to determine if wolves,in fact, are the cause.
“Because California is only in the early stages of wolf
recovery, we need to give these animals a chance to
become established in sustainable numbers rather
than prematurely rushing to end protections that are
vital to their survival,” said Amaroq Weiss, West Coast
wolf organizer at the Center for Biological Diversity.
“But we support the plan's initial emphasis on
restoring wolves to the Golden State and reliance
on nonlethal methods to reduce loss of livestock.”
recovery, we need to give these animals a chance to
become established in sustainable numbers rather
than prematurely rushing to end protections that are
vital to their survival,” said Amaroq Weiss, West Coast
wolf organizer at the Center for Biological Diversity.
“But we support the plan's initial emphasis on
restoring wolves to the Golden State and reliance
on nonlethal methods to reduce loss of livestock.”
This month marks the five-year anniversary of the
arrival in California of wolf OR-7, the first known
wild wolf in the state in 87 years. His arrival
launched the development of a state wolf plan
with input from a stakeholder group representing
conservation, ranching and sports-hunting interests.
OR-7 eventually returned to Oregon, where he
found a mate and has since sired three sets of
pups. In August 2015 state wildlife officials
confirmed the establishment of California’s first
wolf family in nearly a century: the Shasta pack
in Northern California’s Siskiyou County. And just
last month, a pair of wolves was confirmed in
western Lassen County. DNA-testing of scat
collected from the pair shows that the male is
a young adult from one of OR-7’s litters, while
the female is of unknown origin.
arrival in California of wolf OR-7, the first known
wild wolf in the state in 87 years. His arrival
launched the development of a state wolf plan
with input from a stakeholder group representing
conservation, ranching and sports-hunting interests.
OR-7 eventually returned to Oregon, where he
found a mate and has since sired three sets of
pups. In August 2015 state wildlife officials
confirmed the establishment of California’s first
wolf family in nearly a century: the Shasta pack
in Northern California’s Siskiyou County. And just
last month, a pair of wolves was confirmed in
western Lassen County. DNA-testing of scat
collected from the pair shows that the male is
a young adult from one of OR-7’s litters, while
the female is of unknown origin.
“The ongoing arrival of wolves in California is
cause for celebration and makes the state wolf
plan’s provisions all the more important,” stated
Kimberly Baker, public land advocate for the
Environmental Protection Information Center
(EPIC). “Wolf recovery will bring the essence
of wild back to California and reiterates the
need for landscape connectivity.”
cause for celebration and makes the state wolf
plan’s provisions all the more important,” stated
Kimberly Baker, public land advocate for the
Environmental Protection Information Center
(EPIC). “Wolf recovery will bring the essence
of wild back to California and reiterates the
need for landscape connectivity.”
The plan proposes a phased management
approach, in which establishment of four wolf
packs for two consecutive years will trigger
consideration of more aggressive management
of conflicts. After establishment of eight wolf
packs for two consecutive years, management
actions will become even less protective of
wolves. Conservation groups say the reduced
protections come too quickly under the plan,
and call for an ongoing emphasis on
time-proven, research-based nonlethal
measures to minimize conflicts with livestock.
approach, in which establishment of four wolf
packs for two consecutive years will trigger
consideration of more aggressive management
of conflicts. After establishment of eight wolf
packs for two consecutive years, management
actions will become even less protective of
wolves. Conservation groups say the reduced
protections come too quickly under the plan,
and call for an ongoing emphasis on
time-proven, research-based nonlethal
measures to minimize conflicts with livestock.
“It’s exciting that nonlethal methods of reducing
wolf-livestock conflicts are such a foundational
element of this plan, because we know they work,”
said Damon Nagami, a senior attorney in
NRDC’s Land and Wildlife Program. “We want
to give these magnificent animals every possible
chance to survive and thrive here in California.
So we look forward to working with the
Department to ensure that happens.”
wolf-livestock conflicts are such a foundational
element of this plan, because we know they work,”
said Damon Nagami, a senior attorney in
NRDC’s Land and Wildlife Program. “We want
to give these magnificent animals every possible
chance to survive and thrive here in California.
So we look forward to working with the
Department to ensure that happens.”
The agency received significant public input
last year when it released a draft plan for
public comment. Changes requested included
the need to acknowledge the best available
current science on managing conflicts, social
tolerance, the importance of protecting wolves
from illegal killings, and wolves’ critical
ecological role. During the comment period,
19 conservation organizations submitted a
joint comment letter on behalf of 2.9 million
California residents highlighting 27 key
issues of concern in the draft plan. The
vast majority of Californians wants wolves
protected and also fully supports the joint
efforts of the state, conservation groups,
ranchers and hunters to implement nonlethal
prevention measures.
-------------------------------------------------
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiUrq6kpOPQAhVIyFQKHeY0DB8QFggjMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcaliforniawolves.wordpress.com%2Fwest-coast-wolves%2Fcalifornia%2Fthe-shasta-pack%2F&usg=AFQjCNFp9HobxvkUM6rJAETHXHcXk8QN4w&sig2=L6c_p2Bjv_vbbP22Xu8Pnw
last year when it released a draft plan for
public comment. Changes requested included
the need to acknowledge the best available
current science on managing conflicts, social
tolerance, the importance of protecting wolves
from illegal killings, and wolves’ critical
ecological role. During the comment period,
19 conservation organizations submitted a
joint comment letter on behalf of 2.9 million
California residents highlighting 27 key
issues of concern in the draft plan. The
vast majority of Californians wants wolves
protected and also fully supports the joint
efforts of the state, conservation groups,
ranchers and hunters to implement nonlethal
prevention measures.
-------------------------------------------------
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiUrq6kpOPQAhVIyFQKHeY0DB8QFggjMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcaliforniawolves.wordpress.com%2Fwest-coast-wolves%2Fcalifornia%2Fthe-shasta-pack%2F&usg=AFQjCNFp9HobxvkUM6rJAETHXHcXk8QN4w&sig2=L6c_p2Bjv_vbbP22Xu8Pnw
THE SHASTA PACK
Shasta Pack
location of the Shasta Pack in Siskiyou County,
just south of the Oregon/Calif. state line
- Founded: 2015
- Range: East of Mt. Shasta
- Breeding Pair: Yes
- Pups: 5
- Pack Structure:
- 2 Adults
- “Siskiyou” Male
- “Shasta” Female
- 5 Pups
- Born May, 2015
- As of Nov. 2015, three pups are confirmed still with the pack
- This pack passed largely unnoticed until August, 2015. The two adult wolves likely came from Oregon and may have been observed by trail camera in Oregon’s Keno unit in January, 2015. This is a first-generation pack, and the first to produce pups in California in over 90 years.
- CDFW first became aware of a black wolf in the Mt. Shasta area earlier this year, and captured trail camera images of what they believed to be the same animal in May and August. Additional trail cameras captured images of five wolf pups in the same area, as well as two adults, believed to be the breeding pair.
- 11/10/15 CDFW Depredation Report: 1 Calf “Probable”
- Noteworthy: All seven wolves in this pack are black.
- 2 Adults
No comments:
Post a Comment